JimThompson
Sidekick
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2013
- Messages
- 1,372
- Reaction score
- 794
- Points
- 78
That is correct. They were offered 10 episodes.I heard HBO actually wanted to give them more seasons and more episodes. They were the ones who didn't want.
That is correct. They were offered 10 episodes.I heard HBO actually wanted to give them more seasons and more episodes. They were the ones who didn't want.
That's what I've heard as well. I respect that HBO treats their writers well, but in this case it was a terrible move, given that D&D so obviously just wanted to get the show over with. The two battle episodes were incredible, but the story had no room to breathe. And it really hurt last season, too, with Dany's allies all getting eliminated in two episodes, them just forgetting about Ellaria, etc...I heard HBO actually wanted to give them more seasons and more episodes. They were the ones who didn't want. And that's one of the reasons I like and respect HBO. They usually respect the writers.
But yeah. I mean, this last season had 6 episodes. 2 of them were big battles with barely no dialogues. I'm not opposed to this kind of big battles episodes at all. But when you have so many characters and storylines to work in only 6 episodes, you use 2 of them for no dialogues? It should've been more.
But anyway...
I'm sorry, "that's not how it should end" or "this is what was supposed to happen" are NOT valid complaints. If you hated this season because the storyline was rushed and didn't develop properly, than that's a very real issue. But I'm not talking about those fans. How many times do I need to establish this before people stop deciding I'm talking about them?
I largely agree with this, with one small caveat.Sure it is. A story has a beginning, middle, and end. It is judged by how satisfactorily it sets up the threat... how threatening that situation becomes... and how the story resolves itself naturally. It you set up Tom Sawyer as the hero in Act 1 and 2, and then give him no lines and reverse course on his characterization.. letting a different character resolve his main conflict...then that's a problem. It's a flaw with the storytelling... it's not us just complaining because we didn't get the ending we wanted.
You are arguing that the author is above criticism... but there's a whole field of study based on literary criticism. Authors can make poor storytelling decisions, and we have a right to call them out for those decisions when they do.
The problem is you condescendingly said "the vast majority of complaints and childish petition signing" fall into the category, you're trying to invalidate a majority of the complaints against the season/finale by shoving them all into a convenient box where you feel they carry less weight.I'm sorry, "that's not how it should end" or "this is what was supposed to happen" are NOT valid complaints. If you hated this season because the storyline was rushed and didn't develop properly, than that's a very real issue. But I'm not talking about those fans. How many times do I need to establish this before people stop deciding I'm talking about them?
Her death to me was so anticlimactic.
Sansa could have been nicer too and not be so salty towards her.
What's really unfortunate is that Lena Headey wasn't able to win an Emmy for her acting on Game of Thrones. She really should have for Season 4. I was sort of hoping that they'd give her some material to work with this season, so she could be in the running one last time. But this season was mostly just her looking out a window.
Sure it is. A story has a beginning, middle, and end. It is judged by how satisfactorily it sets up the threat... how threatening that situation becomes... and how the story resolves itself naturally. It you set up Tom Sawyer as the hero in Act 1 and 2, and then give him no lines and reverse course on his characterization.. letting a different character resolve his main conflict...then that's a problem. It's a flaw with the storytelling... it's not us just complaining because we didn't get the ending we wanted.
You are arguing that the author is above criticism... but there's a whole field of study based on literary criticism. Authors can make poor storytelling decisions, and we have a right to call them out for those decisions when they do.
Possible.
On the other hand, how do people tend to remember Dexter? Or The Sopranos? The first thing most people seem to recall about those shows is how much they hated their endings.
Be interesting to see how this show is viewed in a year or so.
Are we still talking about the NK? Because it seems to me at the end,, it became clear the bigger transformative aspect of Jon's arc is killing Daenerys. Rushed or not, he loved her and she was the last connection to his past. He thought he was supposed to save a world from Ice, he instead saved it by Fire, and the result is that his heritage is forsaken. There is also the cyclical effect that he is condemned (though much more mercifully) like Ned Stark and banished from this world of politics.
Season 8 has some major problems, who killed the NK is not the big one for me.

I guess that means the Lord of Light brought Jon back to kill Dany, and the Dany was not brought about by the Lord of Light like the Red Priestesses believed? GOT is one of those stories that's so dense... you can basically interpret however you want. I suspect that D&D enjoyed that aspect, because it gave them lots of cover. But yeah, I found the Night King arc to be underwhelming to say the least. Everything was mostly cool until I saw Arya flying towards the Night King. It was all down hill from there unfortunately. For me, I find the Mad Queen Dany twist to be much more workable than the Jon/NK twist.
Would have been kind of cool if the show ended on Bran and his eyes turning blue, or if at least SOMETHING unexpected happened that showed there was more to this ending.
I'm still just shocked that the whole NK/WW saga was wrapped up and swept under the rug after episode 3...and that this 6-episode season basically had 3 main villains dispatched in the span of 3-4 episodes.
I actually don't get the appeal of season 6 to tell you the truth.It's strange, I'm just glad it's over. I honestly been irritated with this show as far back as season 5. By the time I got to S8e3 I was done. I rarely drop shows, but after that episode I had enough. Hell I didn't even drop The Walking Dead during Gimple's run. But GoT was different, it had a endpoint, and only one chance to get it right. And they ****in blew it.
FWIW I almost dropped TWD until Angela Kang saved it.
Mark my words, in a year people will start to appriciate the final season and will miss GOT.
In my mind there is no doubt this will go down in history as the greatest TV series of all time.
PS: Now I look for July and the Emmy nominations. Emillia has never been more deserving of a nominations. And Peter Dinklage MUST win with that finale as his tape.