The Morningstar
Avenger
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2011
- Messages
- 10,017
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
No that just isn't how it works. If anything is there that pushes it to an R rating will be cut and mostly like be added into an Unrated version once it hits disc.
Hopefully they'll release a proper Director's Cut version instead of a lame Extended Ver with 2-3 minutes of rather pointless footage like GR1's Extended Edition.Knowing how these two do movies this is what we can hope for. A pg-13 for the public, and an R for the real fans.
HFM
PG-13, R-rated, it makes me no difference as long as the film entertaining and well made.
PG-13, R-rated, it makes me no difference as long as the film entertaining and well made.
^ Salvation sucked. I'm not sure if a R-Rating would've helped. Maybe given us more darker ideas, like the experiments with humans, and that stuff....
Well BigThor going by the trailer it is safe to say Ghost Rider is going to be getting violent with humans...maybe not bloody gory violent but from what I saw in the trailer it looked hardcore enough to me.
AvP sucked....but it sucked worse for being PG-13. Had it been R, it could've atleast been entertaining in a Freddy Vs. Jason kind of way. Lots gore, and ****, and really cool.
But it wasnt.
Oh for sure! I'm talking about taking the first AvP, and adding some cool gore, and making it more gritty...it could've worked.Well, AvP:Requiem was a hard-R sequel, gore, guts and all, and I'd go as far to say that whole film makes the first AvP look Oscar-worthy.t:
Well BigThor going by the trailer it is safe to say Ghost Rider is going to be getting violent with humans...maybe not bloody gory violent but from what I saw in the trailer it looked hardcore enough to me.
Oh for sure! I'm talking about taking the first AvP, and adding some cool gore, and making it more gritty...it could've worked.