Thebumwhowalks
Superhero
- Joined
- Nov 30, 2010
- Messages
- 5,377
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
So their best bet is to reinvent the whole damn thing from scratch. [but] It'll piss the whole world off royally
Not if it's a great movie.
So their best bet is to reinvent the whole damn thing from scratch. [but] It'll piss the whole world off royally
So, can we just assume this is dead...?
It's because he holds the first Gb film in such high regard, he once said that the first half, or two thirds, of that film was perfect, and you get the sense that Bill Murray is the kind of guy who is pretty hard on films.
He didn't like the way the second film turned out, and wished it had never been made, as he did not want to tarnish the rep of the first.
What are the chances of a GB3 being any good? When the exact same creative team couldn't make a good enough sequel 5 years after the first one?!
With this best route would be is to just write peter out. Say he is on vacation, retired, etc..... So we have a logical way to explain him off. Or He had passed away in the years since they were busters. But then if they didnt have him die off screen, they could at least give chance if the film does go to production to wrestle murray for a mere small cameo. One would hope. I know if he wouldnt do it now if the film did get in production more less likely for him to show up. But maybe if it does actually film he could decide to change him mind and show up for a day or two of shooting.One film Aykroyd desperately wants to make is Ghostbusters 3. He’s been trying to get the gang back together since 1999, when he wrote a first draft of the script. A more recent version, by the writers of the US Office but overseen by Aykroyd, has received a favourable response from the studio, Columbia, and all the original cast bar one: Bill Murray. His cantankerous friend’s refusal to have anything to do with the sequel – which is designed to pass the overalls and backpacks to a new generation of buster – has long been a source of frustration to Aykroyd.
Proposed release dates have been and gone, with Murray intermittently popping up to dismiss talk of a new film as “a bunch of crock”, or “a horrible rumour”. Late last year it was even reported that Murray sent a script back to Aykroyd shredded, and with a note reading “No one wants to pay money to see fat, old men chasing ghosts”. Aykroyd vehemently denied this, but he does admit defeat on the Murray situation.
Will the film ever materialise?
“I honestly don’t know. At this point it’s in suspended animation. The studio, the director Ivan Reitman and Harold Ramis feel there must be a way to do it, but Bill Murray will not do the movie. He doesn’t want to be involved. He’s got six kids, houses all over America. He golfs in these tournaments where they pay him to turn up and have a laugh. He’s into this life and living it. I know we’d have a lot of fun [but] I can’t be mad at him. He’s a friend first, a colleague second. We have a deep personal relationship that transcends business and he doesn’t want to know.”
He’s recently begun to consider recasting Murray’s role with another actor. Or perhaps, I suggest, his character could come back as a ghost in CGI so the actor doesn’t need to give up the golfing? It’s obviously something that has crossed Aykroyd’s mind, but he wonders if Murray would give his approval even to that.
“We’re not going to do a movie that exploits the franchise. The script has to be perfect. I’m the cheerleader, but I’m only one voice in the matter. It’s a surety that Bill Murray will not do the movie, however there is still interest from the studio.” Aykroyd looks pained.