Ghostbusters: Afterlife

Rate the Movie


  • Total voters
    59
Well it was cheaper because the finale was pretty tame compared to other finales. I imagine if they made the same finale as the first one for today, it would have cost a lot more.
Would it? The finale from the first, isn't a large setpiece outside of the giant Marshmallow man. Which now, would probably cost peanuts. He'd be a large, easy to render CGI creation.
 
Making this movie for $75 million was smart on Sony's part. Why can't more studios do this? You run less risk of needing to make a crap ton of money to break even and you can still make a large profit. I know larger the investment means higher the reward, but it's a viable option instead of wasting hundreds of millions on everything.
Franchise films by their very nature, are more expensive. Most aren't even created to make money in the theater. IT's all about minimizing losses there, and making all your money everywhere else. And if the big CGI filled flick hits, it's going to making you hundreds of millions in licensing and merch.
 
Saw it today and absolutely loved it, it stands on it's own while also linking into the nostalgia, if you grew up on the iconic first movie or simply watch it before seeing this then there are certain parts that will make you smile more, but it can also stand alone as it works if the original Ghostbusters were merely created to give a mythology and backstory for this group of new young heroes and their adventure.

While this is obviously a very belated sequel to the 80's Ghostbusers movies the influence of other 80's classics like E.T. and the Goonues is evoked beautifully, managing to be both present day but capturing the charm of those movies from a bygone age, and this is helped by the very likable young cast who are ably supported by Paul Rudd and Carrie Coon, but are the ones that successfully drive the movie and cement themselves to carry the franchise forward. The appearance by the original Ghostbusters is nicely done but for me weren't the standout scenes apart from the beautifully done Egon appearance and the scene when Phoebe first talks to Ray.

The film sets it's tone perfectly from the off with Egon's last act, it is such an atmospheric opening that is carried into the film and pays off in both the story and the character arcs by the time the credits role. It's not in a rush to get where it's going, the story gives time for the audience to get to know the young characters personalities as Phoebe begins to piece together her grandfathers past and what is going on in the small town of Summerville, while her brother Trevor finds the Ecto-1 in the barn and sets about repairing it. Like the original this isn’t an action movie but the chase sequence with the Ecto-1 where they catch their first ghost is fantastic and creative, the mobile remote controlled trap is a neat concept. The final act is also thankfully small in scale and is just long enough, there's nothing overblown, it's more about the culmination of the journey of the characters, old and new, than it is about action or spectacle.

McKenna Grace is the movies lead and is great as Phoebe, while Trevor, Podcast and Lucky all get a chance to shine without having quite the same emotional stakes in their roles, and there's plenty of potential for Mr. Grooberson and Callie after their fun romantic sparring in this movie. :D Whether this remains a stand alone film and sequel to the iconic original, or sets the table to bring the franchise back to life, it's a fantastic movie and one of my favourites of the year.

9/10
I'm so happy you liked it man. I know you were looking forward to it, so seeing how much you enjoyed it, puts a smile on my face. :D
 
I scored it an 8 which may be a little harsh but there were some choices made concerning the story I wish they would've done a little differently, and some nostalgia bits I think they could've cut back on or cut out entirely. There's also some head cannon I have to impart to justify Rudd's possession like Callie was possessed first so they found someone she had a thing for to make it easier. Similar to how Rick Moranis was possessed first and he was attracted to Dana.

Here's the pro's and cons from my point of view:

Pros
  • The film looked gorgeous. The shots of the cornfield and town were just awesome.
  • The discovery of the equipment went well.
  • Rudd's character and introduction
  • How Egon passed and set everything up was great.
  • The concept of ghost Egon showing Phoebe around was great
  • Even the call backs to the adds on you tube
  • Phoebe was great.
  • The ending mostly worked for me
  • Even liked the ties to Ivo Shandor and Gozer. That whole mining thing made sense
  • The OG's showing up
  • Practical effects
  • Where all the OG's ended up. How Egon got to his place though is a con below.
Cons
  • Gozer should've remembered what happened in 84 and been a little more vengeful when it saw the suits.
  • Ivo Shandor's coffin could've been left out if they weren't going to do anything with him
  • The little staypuft things were cute but could've been left out.
  • Phoebe could've been a little more shocked about interacting with ghost Egon.
  • The shot with Rudd and Callie when they first meet as key master and gate keeper something felt silly and out of place with Rudd having that flower in his hair and they way they "hooked up"
  • The reason for Egon leaving and being a bad parent. It just feels wrong. He's of course redeemed but it feels wrong. They could've come up with something better. At least have him be a decent father to Callie then divorce and get the farm. There's a ton of ways to do this better.
  • Crossing the streams. It was unnecessary. In the original they did it to close the portal and reverse the flow. There was no portal this time. I get that Egon wasn't speaking to correct them but still.
  • Podcast covered in Marshmallow. Again nice call back but not needed.
  • The OG's showing up randomly at the perfect time. It should've been a little more earned. Also would've loved to see them in 1A.
Honestly the post credits really setup something special and I hope they take a few notes from GB2 for the sequel and start with a good story and mythology to establish the need for the GBs to be back, but do it better. I'm hopeful for what comes as this is sort of a perfect setup but I've been burned before *cough*TheForceAwakens*cough*. Also I'm hoping we see the 1A and 1 in the next one and I'm hoping we get a few other things like more time with Winston and Ray. Murray's served his purpose IMHO, unless they bring in Oscar then they can have him cameo but his character can be really scaled back at this point
 
Last edited:
Hey that's awesome! Where'd you find that?

I just came across it when I was looking at Ghostbusers Afterlife posters on Google images.

Ghostbusters Afterlife Limited Edition Foil Art Print | AMC Theatres Movie Merchandise


I'm so happy you liked it man. I know you were looking forward to it, so seeing how much you enjoyed it, puts a smile on my face. :D

Thanks man. :D these belated sequels are tricky, especially when using kids, but Reitman nailed it, hopefully Matrix Resurrections is as good!
 
I just came across it when I was looking at Ghostbusers Afterlife posters on Google images.

Ghostbusters Afterlife Limited Edition Foil Art Print | AMC Theatres Movie Merchandise

Dang, already sold out! My Cyber Monday itchy click finger was ready to scoop that up lol.

Want.

I hope they make some statues of the mini-Pufts doing silly things as well, I'd seriously consider buying a couple of those to sit on my desk. Like these, but preferably not Pops, more like how they looked in the film -


48491_GB_MiniPuftLighter_POP_GLAM-WEB_600x.png


48494_GB_MiniPuftCracker_POP_GLAM-WEB_600x.png

48492_GB_MiniPuftFire_POP_GLAM-WEB_600x.png
 
Jason Reitman, Gil Kenan Ink Sony Pictures Overall Deal – The Hollywood Reporter

Sony Pictures Entertainment has signed Jason Reitman and Gil Kenan, the Ghostbusters: Afterlife co-writing partners and Oscar nominees, to an overall producing deal with the studio as they launch their own production banner.

Ghostbusters: Afterlife, the sequel to the 1984 Ghostbusters film, is also directed by Reitman, son of franchise creator Ivan Reitman, and executive produced by Kenan. The movie opened to $44 million at the box office and, through its second week of release, has earned $87.8 million domestically and $115.8 million worldwide.

Ghostbusters: Afterlife‘s box office success is welcomed by Sony after failing to revive the franchise with the 2016 female-skewing Ghostbusters. The studio is counting on big business post-Thanksgiving into the coming weekend.

“Jason and Gil as co-writing partners have a remarkable understanding of commercial quality cinema, and we are thrilled about the upcoming pipeline from these guys,” Sanford Panitch, president of Sony Pictures Motion Picture Group, said in a statement.

“We’re excited to have evolved our storytelling partnership into a full-fledged production company and couldn’t be more proud to have a home at Sony Pictures, the studio most committed to the theatrical movie going experience,” said Reitman and Kenan in their own statement.

It looks like Sony is happy with the movie. I hope this means that we get more.
 
Saw this the other night, and while I kinda get why it’s not more of a critical darling, as fans of the first 2 since forever me and my Dad enjoyed this a lot.

Pheobe was absolutely awesome and ably supported by the also awesome Podcast. I wasn’t huge on Trevor and Lucky but they served a purpose and Gary and Callie were a decent couple.

The finale while a little quieter than the previous movie almost had me in tears a couple of times and I am excited for any possible follow up we get. 8/10.

Also, how nice was it seeing practical effects supported by CGI rather than an overload of the latter?
 
The effects were great. Both practical and digital. It looked exactly as you'd want for a GB film in the modern day.

Had a second viewing yesterday. Good fun still. I wondered if it would hold up to another viewing, but I enjoyed my time with these characters just as much this time around. Still have some issues with the last third, but oh well. I'm very curious to see what Reitman's next move will be.
 
Dammit, Ghostbusters: Afterlife got me with the Carrie Coon of it all… “Phoebe” and those cameos.

Did anyone else hear “Willie Jack” (Reservation Dogs) at Spinners Diner scenes… I never overtly saw her but her voice was totally there in three scenes?
 
I'll be honest, I've got a lot of nostalgic love for Ghostbusters, but the marketing for this movie has done absolutely nothing for me. Despite getting the OG actors back, none of it feels especially Ghostbusters-y to me. Maybe it's the setting, idk. Hoping to be pleasantly surprised at this point.
So this movie basically lived up to my expectations. I did get a little choked up during the finale but I think Ghostbusters pretty much died with Harold Ramis for me. I'd give it maybe a 6? Reitman should avoid spectacle type of stuff in the future because that 3rd act (up until the emotional content at the very end) is where the movie started to feel very perfunctory, like it was just going through the motions, imo. And the editing in some parts was just...weird to me.

I will say McKenna Grace/Phoebe was delightful, though.
 
Finally saw this too, would say 8/10 for me. Overall a well-made entertaining movie that did actual justice to the franchise, unlike the 2016 movie, which was an insult.

I grew up with the first two Ghostbusters movies, but I'm forgetting how I originally saw them, simply because I know I was too young to see either of them in theaters (I was 6 years old when Ghostbusters II came out). It's more than likely I saw them on VHS. In any case, this was a solid addition to the franchise, and definitely feel there's potential for future movies too.

I get that Harold Ramis was a huge part of the first two movies but at the same time, it felt like this movie paid too much attention at being a sequel/continuation/homage of his character, and might've been better if all of the characters had been new and standalone.

That said, I still appreciated that it was an homage, and I definitely geeked out at the references to the previous movies (especially loved
Ray's opportunity to say that he WAS a god
). And as pointed out above, it was great to see some of the ghosts done with practical effects too! Oh and the "remastered" sound effects on the proton packs were done really well too, major kudos to whoever did the sound editing/design.

I'm officially interested to see what comes next in this franchise. But IMO it was a missed opportunity that the studio didn't release this in October. I bet it would've done even better.
 
Last edited:
So this movie basically lived up to my expectations. I did get a little choked up during the finale but I think Ghostbusters pretty much died with Harold Ramis for me. I'd give it maybe a 6? Reitman should avoid spectacle type of stuff in the future because that 3rd act (up until the emotional content at the very end) is where the movie started to feel very perfunctory, like it was just going through the motions, imo. And the editing in some parts was just...weird to me.

I will say McKenna Grace/Phoebe was delightful, though.

While I liked the movie more than you, I agree on the 3rd act, it was a bit perfunctory and the movie lost me a little there until certain characters showed up.
 
It will be interesting where they go. The end credits make it seem like they are starting up in NYC again. But do you bring Phoebe back? I think they need some grown-ups who can really be a “team”, including someone who is as intelligent as Egon or Ray when it comes to the paranormal stuff.
Though it seems that it will be going back to NYC, I would love to see a Ghostbusters movie take place in New Orleans. That city has such a rich haunted history that it would make for a great setting
 
One of the most exciting things about a follow up to me is a new story, where-ever it may be. I want to trust Reitman to be a little more original next time. JJ Abrams comparisons are fine the first time but cancer the second time around. I'm optimistic though. I really liked the tone, the new characters and the interplay between them. Would gladly check in with them again.
 
They need to expand the mythology around ghosts. GBII at least incorporated new concepts that are just as interesting as anything on the first one.
 
While the third act was more small scale, I do think the second act Ecto chase was wonderful and probably then most pure 'action' action sequence in the whole franchise.
 
While the third act was more small scale, I do think the second act Ecto chase was wonderful and probably then most pure 'action' action sequence in the whole franchise.

That was probably the highlight of the movie for me and the moment I had a serious geek out. Seeing the Ecto doing its thing was great and we haven't seen it involved in a chase before.
 
That was probably the highlight of the movie for me and the moment I had a serious geek out. Seeing the Ecto doing its thing was great and we haven't seen it involved in a chase before.

Agreed. One of my biggest gripes with the film was that this would have been the perfect moment for the GB theme, or the remixed version of it from the commercials blaring.
 
I really liked the first 30-40 minutes. Tone/nostaligia were really good and I loved the inclusion of the original score. Child actors were better than I could have ever hoped - especially Phoebe and Podcast because they owned this movie. I could tell they were parallels to Egon and Ray. Hell even Trevor to a minor degree i.e. chasing the ladies like Vankman.

Then the movie devolves into silliness and forgets to be it's own legitimate chapter in this series. I mean there's no sugar coating it - this is GB1 set it Summerville. Familiar lines/shtick from the that film began being forced. I knew EXACTLY who the Keymaster/Gatekeeper were going to be very early on. Oh and before I forget the Evo Shandor appearance might've been the most half concocted thing possible - oh looks he's alive and oh he's dead. Just sloppy. In the effort to recycle the story for kids who didn't grow up with the original they missed an opportunity to flesh him out.

What I disliked the most was the fact that it tried to cram 30 years of "what happened to the original GB's" into a quick jailhouse phone call. As much as I loved seeing them show up - something about it was really hamfisted, especially Vankman who was at Ham Level 10. I felt they could've been written in with more fluently. Btw Ernie Hudson doesn't age a day. He makes the rest of them look ancient.

I for one missed the woman who played Gozer in the original and was not a fan of Olivia Wilde. Her dog-beasts looked really good though and I loved the incorporation of practical EFX. The climax felt really off, especially tone-wise. I know it was supposed to be heartfelt moment with everyone getting to see Egon, but it didn't work for me.

6.5 out of 10.
 
Last edited:
Olivia Wilde is so distinctive that it was kind of jarring to see her play Gozer. She would have been better suited for a different role, even as just a different evil spooky thing.
 
I was amazed they found a person to voice Gozer that sounded close to the original actress's voice who passed the new voice was SO good
 
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"