I don't think GL would be a bomb just underperform, box office mojo didn't factor in the 2nd week sales of many foreign countries, plus, there are many other countries which GL haven't aired yet. I'm prediting a close to $300,000 sales
It's a bomb.
A comic retailer friend wrote this:
Green Lantern was inaccessible to the non-comic audience and thats why its not doing well. There was too much information presented too quickly on who the Corps and the enemy were, couple with the fact that the enemy was a non-human entity that had a 2 hour build up and a 7 minute tear down. Joe Average cant relate or understand that the way we can.
Thor had empathy and romance. A father/son, passing of the torch legacy story is something men can relate to and the romance angle, big, confused beefcake shows up out of nowhere and is grounded through the compassion of a woman, is something women can relate to. Thor did well because it was a good movie told well, not because of a lack of competition. Green Lantern was an okay movie told poorly and had no competition in its opening weekend and fared worse than X-Men First Class did in its opening frame.
A lot has to do with marketing as well. GLs marketing was unclear and lacking (esp the romance angle, that should have been played up WAY more to attract more women). Thor and X-Mens marketing was far better and as such, brought in a wider audience.
The GL sequel is already a go and it will do better as it will be a man-against-a-man and not a cloudand will be more easily understood than the first movie.
I don't se it making 300 million WW.
Box Office Guru is predicting 120 - 125 million domestic. The foreign numbers so far are so, so. Meaning it likely won't make muchmore overseas. I'm guessing then 150 million overseas.
My guess is it will end up with a total WW box of 275 million.
I think a gang of robots is getting in the way right now.
So do you think Marvel/Disney purposely announced Thor 2's release date (July 26 2013) at this time to dig it in to WB/DC?
Let's see - that means Marvel has 2 comic book films set for 2013 and will likely have a 3rd - introducing a new character. Wolverine 2 may slip to 2013 also so Marvel could have 4 releases that year.
What is the other Marvel movie announced for 2013 besides Thor 2? Btw, I don't think it is a dig at all; Marvel just wanted to secure that opening weekend, that's why they made the announcement as early as they did.
What is the other Marvel movie announced for 2013 besides Thor 2? Btw, I don't think it is a dig at all; Marvel just wanted to secure that opening weekend, that's why they made the announcement as early as they did.
So do you think Marvel/Disney purposely announced Thor 2's release date (July 26 2013) at this time to dig it in to WB/DC?
So do you think Marvel/Disney purposely announced Thor 2's release date (July 26 2013) at this time to dig it in to WB/DC?
Let's see - that means Marvel has 2 comic book films set for 2013 and will likely have a 3rd - introducing a new character. Wolverine 2 may slip to 2013 also so Marvel could have 4 releases that year.
If the superhero genre fades away Marvel's over saturation is going to be a big reason for it.
If the superhero genre fades away Marvel's over saturation is going to be a big reason for it.
The iron's been cooling since 2008, god help them when the superhero craze wears out, they've got nothing else to fall back on.