BH/HHH
You Are My World
- Joined
- Apr 7, 2004
- Messages
- 30,113
- Reaction score
- 916
- Points
- 78
Agreed with both your main points there. I love the TDKR as a book, but there's very few people who can argue that Miller didn't treat Superman - as a character - very badly in order to strengthen his storyline and characterisation of Batman in the book.
The Superman I grew up with in many media (TV, comics, cartoons, and so on) was a superhero who personified the core qualities many of us aspire to - strength of character, willpower, morality, determination, conviction, and so on - and not someone who would ever become a government floozy, a God-like lapdog who just takes orders for a quiet life.
Despite that poor treatment, there's no question that it's a great book overall and I have an unmarked copy sealed away with many other of the best graphic novels from over the years that I could find. I don't hate on the book. But I always think of it as an Elseworlds type story and not one which I would consider as having any input to how the Superman character has grown and developed in comics over the years, despite it's cultural impact and status.
And in terms of the films, you raise a good point about the gap. You're right when you say there was really nothing cinematic for a long time (19 years) to take away people's enduring image of Reeve as Superman. And then when it did happen, the Director came up with a quasi-continuation of those Donner-era films anyway. As time has passed, it's become clear how idiotic an approach that was.
I agree it is a great book and the Superman portrayal in it works for that story. I don't think Miller ever intended for it to in anyway 'damage' Superman. What I don't like is the legacy it's left, people latch on to it as reasons to hate on Superman like the government stooge thing. But it's hard to explain to people that's it's not not ever was canon and that its an elseworlds tale.
I think had they got someone over than Jon Peters as the producer in the 90s we'd have gotten a Superman film sooner. Although he's crazy that's not the main issue with Peters, the main issue is he latched onto what's hot at that moment or what the latest trend is. Had he just let a filmmaker come in and do Superman film things could have been much different. I really do think that the gap is what damaged the Superman character in the mainstream. I truly believe a fresh Superman trilogy made in the late 90s/2000s with the right people would have catapulted Superman to great heights again in terms of popularity.