GothicPowerMix1
Superhero
- Joined
- Nov 1, 2004
- Messages
- 6,027
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
We will see the Film no matter what GWW. But it IS FOX
strugler said:yes the movie will feel "RUSH HOUR" and half
GreatWhiteWhale said:I know it seems like history repeating.
But..
Would it be worth waiting and seeing the actual film do you think?
Dnsk said:We will see the Film no matter what GWW. But it IS FOX
GreatWhiteWhale said:Good point.
*Starts writing Angry Letter*
"Dear Fox.
I HATE YOU AND I DONT WANT TO BE FRIENDS ANYMORE.
Signed GWW"

Yeah pretty much. Tons of new characters are being introduced. More than even the first and second movies. And like they all keep proclaimingFieryBalrog said:Thats just BS excuses.
There hasnt been a single good superhero movie at that length. Yes, even X1, which had big problems thanks to its length, which meant it could only focus on Wolverine and Rogue and screwed over the other characters. This movie had at least double the characters of X1, including new ones, and its about the same length? Terrible.
If the movie is great I'll be happy but I'm not very hopeful. It sounds like a rushed hack-job to meet the May 26th deadline.
GreatWhiteWhale said:However, I dont think we're getting a brilliant, spectacular, one-for-the-history books, unforgettable, please everyone type film. I don't think this will be the jewel in FOX's Superhero films crown.
GreatWhiteWhale said:Hmm..
Well, im pretty sure Fantastic Four was doomed from the start.
I think they took the wrong tone with it, made the wrong casting decisions, wrong director, bad script, good budget however, decent production crew.
Look, im not saying that FOX gives Superhero films pedigree attention, but I am saying that FOX recognise how vocal the fans can be and that X-Men is an important franchise in their moneymaking arsenal.
I don't think we're getting a terrible film, I don't think we're getting a good film, I think we're getting a great film at 1h45 minutes.
However, I dont think we're getting a brilliant, spectacular, one-for-the-history books, unforgettable, please everyone type film. I don't think this will be the jewel in FOX's Superhero films crown.
But I think it will be signifigantly better than Fantastic Four and all the other Superhero franchises FOX owns. I think this film will be at least on Par with X1 in terms of story, and likely on par with a film like Troy in terms of scope, but NOT on par with X2 in terms of running time and careful scene deliberation.
FieryBalrog said:I wasn't expecting a classic film, I dont really expect that of any superhero blockbuster, and thats not what I was hoping for. I was hoping for a great film, and with all the other information, PLUS the running time, I dont think I'll get that either.
I don't think we're getting a terrible film, I don't think we're getting a good film, I think we're getting a great film at 1h45 minutes.
freshandclean said:Why is it that you can think we're getting a great film before even seeing it but advise everyone else not to judge until they see it? I'm not being antagonistic, but doesn't it work both ways? You can't criticize someone for being critical about the film without seeing it then turn around and say your sure it'll be great.
What makes someone thinking that 1hr 43min isn't enough time for an epic film less valid then someone thinking it'll be great because *insert reasoning*?
GreatWhiteWhale said:Oh, im sorry, i should have cleared that up. The rules I set don't apply to me. im above the law.
freshandclean said:Aren't we all.
FieryBalrog said:That contingent existed for Catwoman also.
Nell2ThaIzzay said:I'm really sick and tired about the *****ing concerning the runtime.
Nell2ThaIzzay said:I'm really sick and tired about the *****ing concerning the runtime.