Picard Sisko
Prepare to be Assimilated
- Joined
- May 28, 2012
- Messages
- 17,946
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Harry Goblin looks fine, but its Norman that should be different IMO
I don't think Harry goblin looks that bad. I'm actually staring to like it.
Harry looks like one of the flying monkeys. i guess that makes sense; given the original goblin's wicked witch-esque look.
Oh yeah who can't forget that broom at first i thought it was a flying vaccum cleanerDAT Glider though.
I thought it would have been more daring if they went with the original mechanical flying broomstick like in GG's first appearance, but I guess that's just my nostalgia talking.
DAT Glider though.
I thought it would have been more daring if they went with the original mechanical flying broomstick like in GG's first appearance, but I guess that's just my nostalgia talking.
my friend and I really dig the new goblin design, I don't really see what the fuzz is about
Well, I care about comic book characters. But I am open to change in comic book movies.neither do I, it's perfect design, maybe even better then in comics! Who care about comicbook characters really? I dont see the fuzz about it either.
Hollywood can make even better villains and name them as example "The Better Goblin" just for sake of story. We will see naration: The Better Goblin is stronger and more powerfull version of ordinary Green Goblin who will you not see just for pissing off the fans. Also it's not Norman, it's his son or maybe his grandson!
Well, I care about comic book characters. But I am open to change in comic book movies.
Wow. Just wow.sure, but not in this way. Why not stay true to comics in good way, change some not important details, make different take on getting to events from comics. Something like Rouroni Kenshin did with from manga to live action movie. Dose anyone want to see Lord of the Rings or Hobbit not with magic, but with Force? Or maybe instead of Staff have Light Saber. Or have Hobbit not with mediaval clothes but with black leather costume...We can also change Smaug. He is dragon but he speaks, so remove him snout it will make him more believable![]()
Wow. Just wow.
Right, because Sony is the only studio that makes changes from the source material. You're only fooling yourself.Sorry but this is how Sony works. Staying true too original material or characters never way their way, they bit suprised me in ASM doing Lizard story which was not bad for introducing whole story and movie could be even better if they didnt remove some IMPORTANT scenes. But everything after ASM started feeling another Raimi *hit. I even swallowed bad design of Lizard just for sake of storytelling, because it felt as Ultimate Spider-man even if called it was Amazing, but this is going worse and worse. I loved idea having Harry in movie as friend of Peter, not as villain or another Raimi's New Goblin angle.
Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me.
![]()
Right, because Sony is the only studio that makes changes from the source material. You're only fooling yourself.
Your loss, bud.Sure i know. This is why I go in cinema once or twice a year and usually it's as example were LoTR, later Harry Potter, and after that Hobbit trough years (and i wonder why...) Ofcourse they are some exceptions as ASM, but only because Spider-man is my favorite super-hero character.
Your loss, bud.