How would you reboot Batman?

Isn't that how he is already?
Yes, that is the essense of the character with my point being is that he should be portrayed as such rather than being reworked so radically like alot of people here have suggested over the years. The Saw-like murderer and the FBI agent ideas could be interesting takes on other villains but just aren't how I see the Riddler.

BTW,nice ideas Rodrigo!
 
I'd keep the hyper-realism of Nolan's trilogy, it seems to resonate with general audiences, makes them feel intelligent.

I'd continue the story from where The Dark Knight Rises leaves off with a late 30s/early 40s Batman.

I'd play up an animalistic approach to Batman as a haunting creature of the night, as opposed to the militeristic stuff in Nolan's interpretation. I'd definitely bring back more of the Golden Age aspects of the character.
 
I'd keep the hyper-realism of Nolan's trilogy, it seems to resonate with general audiences, makes them feel intelligent.

I'd continue the story from where The Dark Knight Rises leaves off with a late 30s/early 40s Batman.

I'd play up an animalistic approach to Batman as a haunting creature of the night, as opposed to the militeristic stuff in Nolan's interpretation. I'd definitely bring back more of the Golden Age aspects of the character.
I'd rather batman NOT be a mindless brute. We have yet to see a batman on film who is as intelligent or as brilliant a detective as the one in the comics. In the comics batman created all of his gadgets didn't he? he's considered one of the most intelligent people on the planet. In the movies if Bale's batman has a problem he goes to lucious fox for some deus ex machina.
 
Odds are it would be impossible to continue where TDKR leaves off.
As much as I expect Nolan will conclude his "vision", I highly doubt the studio would let him do anything to effectively tie off the movie permanantly. Nolan's Batman essentially is licensed to print money for WB. I'm sure whatever comes next they'll try to at least somewhat cash in on the built in Nolan fanbase.
 
If they indeed tried to continue Nolan's version they they should use Batman Begins and TDK as background, and look at it as Batman's year One, while Rises is Nolan's oun The Dark Knight Returns
 
If they indeed tried to continue Nolan's version they they should use Batman Begins and TDK as background, and look at it as Batman's year One, while Rises is Nolan's oun The Dark Knight Returns

That's not a bad idea. If
Batman does indeed kick it
in The Dark Knight Rises, it'd be an interested idea to set the next Batman movies in the years between TDK and TDKR. Assuming, that is, those years aren't explored in the film.
 
I'm skeptical DC Comics and Warner Bros will allow them to kill Batman.

It would show disrespect to the source material. Nolan's approaches have been incredibly faithful and respectful to the source material.

When I said continue the story from TDKR, I meant continue the story with an established Batman. They don't need exact story threads from Nolan's trilogy, but they should keep the general progression of Batman moving forward.

Batman 4 should stand on it's own, but not contradict anything Nolan set up with his origins triology.
 
I think, at this point, the decision to
kill Batman
or not rests entirely with Nolan. He's proven that this is his franchise until he walks away from it, and he has earned the right to end his story in a way that he sees fit. I mean, that's the thing about a movie franchise. It ends. Comic books don't.

If Batman
dies
, it's not like it's the end of the character. Batman can be rebooted in so many different ways.
 
Well WB sent out emails when the trailer came out entitled "The Legend Dies". There just will be no sequels to TDK Trilogy. Especially considering Nolan will be producing the next series. Full reboot seems inevitable now.

Not to mention it has been reported, by on set ninjas that:

Lucius dies (killed by Tate), Batman dies and speculated that Alfred dies.
 
I think, at this point, the decision to
kill Batman
or not rests entirely with Nolan. He's proven that this is his franchise until he walks away from it, and he has earned the right to end his story in a way that he sees fit. I mean, that's the thing about a movie franchise. It ends. Comic books don't.

If Batman
dies
, it's not like it's the end of the character. Batman can be rebooted in so many different ways.
Even when Nolan said that i didn't agree with him, he's a fan of the Bond films yet didn't remember that that's a good example of a movie franchise that doesn't end? Even if they reboot Batman, the film franchise is technically continuing, Batman has that kind of potencial, i just think that Nolan first gave a great begining for any director and studio to continue with Batman Begins and The Dark Knight, and now is wasting that to end it
 
If they want a drastically different take, I wouldn't mind seeing Guy Ritchie take on Batman. He'd make it more campy, but he can handle camp very well.
 
yeah, his camp isn't cheesy, if that makes sense. I wouldn't mind him at all.
 
yeah, his camp isn't cheesy, if that makes sense. I wouldn't mind him at all.
I think he fixes one problem with Nolan insofar that Nolan really writes these grim, humorless, disconnected characters. It's almost like most of his cast is afflicted with Asperger's. This works for Batman, because Batman is an anti-social d*bag by and large, but then you have characters like Robin, that Nolan clearly doesn't get.

Yes, Nolan, the world isn't grim sh** all the time. I think a guy like Guy Ritchie could make concepts like Robin, (a different take on) The Joker, The Riddler, Penguin, and guys like Mr. Freeze really work. Nolan's characters kind of pigeonhole him into excessively grim and "realistic" scenarios. People aren't that humorless across the board. Someone needs to inject levity back into Batman that isn't simply a collection of one-liners. I also don't want the excessively weird levity of Burton either. Ritchie is a good pick I think, and would be different from what has come before.
 
I would take it back to it's roots and completely reboot it. It would be an amalgamation of the tones and themes found from the Burton films, Nolan films and the Timm/Dini animated series. The setting would be the late 1930s and while "comic accuracy/history" wouldn't be crucial I'd use it as a grid for the structure of my film. I would definitely have it begin with an opening WB logo with an exciting black and white period piece of a live action Zorro. You know, an exciting, adventure filled opening which would eventually take the audience from the Zorro film, to the audience that features Bruce Wayne and his parents. I'd try to make it as cheerful and optimistic as possible, like a typical family outing to the movies. Something audiences could identify with. Obviously after that, the events that would unfold would be tragic with a depressing tone. Have young Bruce start out as a cheerful, wide eyed, grinning kid, to a a child that witnesses the brutal killing of his parents (shockingly graphic to push the PG-13 rating), sadness but also anger. I'd play on the loss aspect of losing a loved one at an early age by showing things like the funeral, elders telling an innocent kid about the responsibilities that he'll have to have that a child shouldn't have to worry about and ultimately, the bed side vow/prayer that Wayne makes that Alfred would catch secretly and worry about. I wouldn't spend too much time, but I'd definitely start out with an emphasis on Wayne's loss. I'd try and keep the mental and physical training to a montage that would express just how far one would have to go to devote themselves to become Batman. The main story would take place early in Batman's career. He would face mobsters and weird, crime doctors. He would have the "feared, creature of the night" persona just as the original golden age Batman. Police and public support would be minimal and played up later in other films. The main villain would be Hugo Strange using "Prey" as reference. I would utilize elements of the sinister, crazed doctor/scientists from the early comics as well as the modern approach for Strange. This is a man obsessed with Batman. The film would really delve deep into the psyche of Bruce Wayne and Batman, what better character to provide that exploration than Strange. Also beneficial is the fact it wouldn't be a villain we've seen before. Joker would only be hinted at with a "pre-Joker" encounter with a mob fight at a factory, perhaps one of many hired muscle to take care of a problem for Strange who has connections with the mob (Rupert Thorne, Maroni, take your pick).

By the end you'd get a complete understanding of what goes on behind the cowl of Batman. The obsessions, the guilt, the power, etc. By the end, you'd just want to comfort and hug this kid that lost what was must important and crucial to him while at the same time, being impressed, frightened and in awe with the Batman persona he created because of it. It would be very "parent centric" and wouldn't end with Batman on top of a roof top again.

A future film would most likely include the Joker. In fact, if you set up that Batman created him in the first film, subtlety to the audience, you could play on that with the film. Suppose it is a factoryesque scene (Ace Chemicals/Axis, whatever) in the first and it's just a nameless thug you see get thrown in. The second film can go in deeper to who exactly that was that the audience saw.

The sequels would be about Batman, pathos and how the villains directly mirror and represent Batman's personality, WHILE being period pieces. Want to see what Batman would be like in the 50's, 60's etc. like in the comics? These films would express that. Batman would change with the times so to speak the first being the 30s. You could easily have a Batman in a costume in the beginning, one that can take 30s pistols and weapons without armor (either by getting hit or simply dodging) to one that would require armor. The key thing would be evolution.
 
I never realized it before you posted this for some reason, but child Bruce in BB is the most wooden child actor I think I've ever seen.
 
I would make a romantic comedy featuring Robin and Batgirl.
 
I would make a romantic comedy featuring Robin and Batgirl.
As absurd as that sounds i think it would work :dry:
Welcome to the SHHype
icon14.gif
 
I actually think they should make it more like the Adam West 60's series. It'd be a refreshing change and very distinct from the preceding series. Not quite as goofy as the series, but that sense of colorful pop-art, and even the campiness. It'd be fun to see a bigger-budgeted approach to that. :D
 
That could turn out as either, another Batman & Robin, or a Grant Morrison Batman comic coming to life :D
 
I wouldn't mind a batman with more of an adventure/ mystery feel to it. sherlock holmes imo had the perfect tone, not that I want batman quipping and spouting one liners, but that swashbuckling vibe ya know?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"