How would you reboot Batman?

Batman is not going to die in TDKR. WB would never green light a Batman dies film. I doubt Nolan would even suggest such a thing. Children go to these movies, not just teenagers and young adults. This isn't a film that's meant to appeal to aloof fanboys and the Oscar community. It has to be mainstream enough to make a buttload of money. There is a very large section of the general public who recoil when movies kill characters like Batman. They also want to continue Batman in other mediums and future films. It makes things a little awkward if his most high profile movie series kills him.
 
Luke Evans would be a good Bruce Wayne/Batman for a Reboot
tumblr_lsrycl3PXI1qa0wj4o1_500.jpg
 
I think the Batman legend would benefit very much from a serialized storytelling on a premium cable channel, such as HBO (which, it just so happens, is owned by Time Warner, the parent company of WB). Yes, I know - after the massive success of The Dark Knight, some people may scoff at the idea of Batman heading back to the small screen - but hear me out. I'm not thinking like a studio exec right now. I know this is highly unlikely, but creatively, it's probably the most interesting thing they could do after Nolan's Dark Knight trilogy wraps in July.

I'd make it about ten episodes each season, and I'd make sure to cast a capable but relatively unknown young actor as the Bat. I'd start him off in Year One, but I wouldn't retell the origin story, as Batman's origin story is now as much a part of the pop-culture subconscious as the last son of Krypton or the boy who lived. It's unnecessary. Pick up with Bruce Wayne as Batman, and flesh him and supporting characters out with flashbacks when necessary. Chronological leaps tend to work perfectly in serialized dramatic series, if done correctly.

As for the tone, I'd heed a bit closer to the source material, but still keep it as dark and gritty as possible. The thing about Batman is, you can go basically as dark as you want, and as long as Batman doesn't kill people, it won't seem the least bit out of place. People are already talking about the dark tone of the next Spider-Man film seeming off, and with good reason - that's not who Spider-Man was or is. But Batman has always come from a dark place, and we live in dark times. They shouldn't dream of making him campy, or light hearted, in any way, shape, or form.

I'd keep the more fantastical/scifi elements intact as well, where appropriate. Basically, I wouldn't want it to be as hyperrealistic as Nolan's Gotham, but it shouldn't be too silly and out-there either. I don't think a massive mountain of sentient clay belongs anywhere other than the comics, cartoons, and videogames, but it wouldn't be too crazy to have a criminal mastermind fall into a vat of acid and come out sheet-white, for instance...

Now, as I said, I'm not thinking of this from the business point of view, but even if you stop for a moment and do think of it, it seems feasible that it would be a very profitable enterprise for Time Warner. Sure, a well-done Batman show would be costly. But after seeing the kind of production that has been put together for shows like Boardwalk Empire and Mad Men, I have no doubt it could be accomplished. Even Heroes, that ill-fated superhero show on NBC, had believable special effects and production design, with a budget smaller than HBO would allow for a new marquee series, and twice as many episodes than this hypothetical Batman show would have per season. Point is, you look around TV land, and you see that it would be expensive, but doable, and the rewards would be worth it.

When you consider the fact that HBO right now doesn't really have anything that caters specifically to the 18 - 29 year old, and you consider how many thousands, dare I say MILLIONS of people would become new HBO customers if a promising Batman show began airing on the heels of Nolan's massive films, it seems like common sense that they would want to consider this possibility. Then there's DVD and Blu-Ray sales, and a very good chance that DC Comics would see sales rise as well, and overall, it seems like they could make a TON of money... IF they do it right.

And how great would it be for the fans? Imagine the Gotham City stories that could be told by a talented cast and crew with ten to twelve hours to tell it, instead of two? The possibilities are endless.
 
Last edited:
How I'd do it..

Director-Guillermo Del Torro/Mathew Vaughn or Simon West are my top 3 choices

Plot:Batman now in his late 30's and retired for 5 years is about to return to be Gotham's true savior after new threats are forcing him to return to action and reunite with old friends(Nightwing&Oracle)to fight!

I'd have Bruce narrate the opening,Which would be flashbacks to his origins/backgrounds on Dick Greyson&Barbara Gordon/montage fights with villains and reason he retired(main reason would be cause he failed to save Robin/Tim Drake from Joker)

Cast:
Bruce Wayne/Batman(Adrian Pasdar)
adrian-pasdar.jpg


Di** Greyson/Nightwing(Milo Ventimigilia)
milo-ventimiglia.jpg


Barbra Gordon/Oracle(Katherine Heigl)
katherine-heigl.jpg


Alfred(Tim Curry)
tc38.jpg


Commissioner Gordon(Jack Coleman)
Jack.jpg


Hush(Arnold Vosloo)
arnold.jpg


Dr.Strange(Ben Kingsley)
kingsley.jpg


Joker(cameo)-Paul Bettanny
d_bettany.jpg


Harley Quinn(cameo)-Hayden Panettiere
72016_haden_sandino_122_859lo.jpg


Batsuit:
Arkham Asylum&City's game's suit(I'd tweak some stuff like the gauntlets&boots)
Vy2IM.jpg


Gotham City's look&feel-Very similar The Crow
 
that's basically the plot to the dark knight rises...also, no to hiegel, and what's with the heroes reunion? lol
 
-Oh so in TDKR Bruce has been Batman for many years and then retired/Comes back cause of Hush&Strange/Had Greyson&Barbara as side-kicks in flash-backs and are heroes on their own for the rest of the film???..How is that anything like the TDKR?Bruce comes back after an injury and was Batman for 8 years(in my story the Bat years are elements from different stories in the comics and it's shown in flash-backs/montage)

-IF you don't like her that's your deal.

-I just think those actors are perfect for these roles(them working together on Heroes is a coincidence)!!!
 
Last edited:
I'd probably set it in a self contained universe, but have a lot of rich Batman elements. Bat styled vehicles and gadgets, and definitely would have the batsuit and villains look like their comic book counterparts.
 
Add me to the Luke Evans bandwagon. I just wish his voice was deeper.
 
I wish Luke Evans wasn't openly gay.

I don't think Warner Bros will cast him.
 
Rockstar said:
I wish Luke Evans wasn't openly gay.

I don't think Warner Bros will cast him.
..........

Chris Nolan (Banned) said:
He's openly gay. Don't think he has a realistic shot with Warner Bros.
Hmmm....
 
Do they have an anti-gay policy or something?
 
Well Heath Ledger's movie before TDK was Brokeback Mountain, so maybe Warner Bros will only consider Evans' acting ability.
 
It's just a Hollywood thing. Actors like Kevin Spacey continue to get lots of lead work because they're in the closet. Hollywood studios have a bit of a 'don't ask, don't tell' policy when it comes to this stuff. I may not agree with it, but it's true.

Evans is openly gay. I can't seriously see the execs eyeing him as a good fit for Batman/Bruce Wayne.

Perhaps the Nolan factor could influence things, but I don't think Evans is a good enough actor, or even good enough fit for Batman to warrant that realistically.

Well Heath Ledger's movie before TDK was Brokeback Mountain, so maybe Warner Bros will only consider Evans' acting ability.

Well he was playing a gay character. Big difference. I believe even Bale played a gay character before.
 
It's just a Hollywood thing. Actors like Kevin Spacey continue to get lots of lead work because they're in the closet. Hollywood studios have a bit of a 'don't ask, don't tell' policy when it comes to this stuff. I may not agree with it, but it's true.

Evans is openly gay. I can't seriously see the execs eyeing him as a good fit for Batman/Bruce Wayne.

Perhaps the Nolan factor could influence things, but I don't think Evans is a good enough actor, or even good enough fit for Batman to warrant that realistically.



Well he was playing a gay character. Big difference. I believe even Bale played a gay character before.
neil patrick harris, Ian Mckellan, john glover, sean hayes, udo kier, nahtan lane, david hype pierce, and george tekai beg to differ.
 
Yeah? How many of them played the superheroic lead role in a 200+ Million tentpole blockbuster?

The closest we got was McKellan playing the villain in X-Men. Not exactly the same as casting Bruce Wayne/Batman.


Remember, this is the studio that initially had Bale put on a fake American accent in interviews fearing audiences would be turned off by a British Batman.

No way would they tempt fate with an openly gay actor as Batman. That would be a huge publicity mess.

Batman is not going to die in TDKR. WB would never green light a Batman dies film. I doubt Nolan would even suggest such a thing. Children go to these movies, not just teenagers and young adults. This isn't a film that's meant to appeal to aloof fanboys and the Oscar community. It has to be mainstream enough to make a buttload of money. There is a very large section of the general public who recoil when movies kill characters like Batman. They also want to continue Batman in other mediums and future films. It makes things a little awkward if his most high profile movie series kills him.

It would be bad marketing too. How could they sell half the Bat merchandise for TDKR, especially to boys, if Batman bites the bullet?

It's not gonna happen.
 
Last edited:
Yeah? How many of them played the superheroic lead role in a 200+ Million tentpole blockbuster?

The closest we got was McKellan playing the villain in X-Men. Not exactly the same as casting Bruce Wayne/Batman.


Remember, this is the studio that initially had Bale put on a fake American accent in interviews fearing audiences would be turned off by a British Batman.

No way would they tempt fate with an openly gay actor as Batman. That would be a huge publicity mess.



It would be bad marketing too. How could they sell half the Bat merchandise for TDKR, especially to boys, if Batman bites the bullet?

It's not gonna happen.
Hehe...you said 'tentpole'.....
 
ian was also gandalf in the highly iconic popular LOTR Franchise and reprising the role in the hobbit
 
I wish Luke Evans wasn't openly gay.

I don't think Warner Bros will cast him.
:whatever:

They cast a straight man as a gay Batman (George Clooney), so there's no reason why they wouldn't cast a gay man as a straight Batman.

Edit: On a more serious note, V for Vendetta is about an anti-hero fighting an anti-gay (among other things) totalitarian regime. The intolerance of homosexuality is a major theme in the movie... a talk show host and friend to one of the main characters is a gay man who is kidnapped by the regime, and V himself finds inspiration in a letter written by a lesbian in her prison cell. If WB had a problem with gay people, they never would have even given that movie the green light.
 
Last edited:
Luke Evans is playing Bard in WB's upcoming adaptation of The Hobbit. This "argument" is invalid.

And just to be clear. It's okay for straight actors to play gay characters in major roles, but gay actors can't play straight characters in major roles? And casting an open homosexual is "bad marketing" and "a huge publicity mess?" Wow. Coming dangerously close to bigotry here. You honestly think, in this day and age, that a major film studio would turn down an actor for a major role just because of his sexual orientation?

Someone needs to wake up, realize the world has moved forward, and try to catch up.
 
Last edited:
ian was also gandalf in the highly iconic popular LOTR Franchise and reprising the role in the hobbit

Not to be offensive...but the LOTR/Hobbit stuff is VERY gay-tinged to begin with.....you're not going to see a bunch of little men hugging and crying and singing like that in, say, Batman or even Flash.

But back to WB....it's not like WB os specifically anti-gay, but if they feel that it will invariably cause bad publicity and negative backlash...translating into lower sales, they're not exactly for it. At the end of the day, WB is not in the business of making the world more socially conscious with their movies. They're here to make money. The probably won't support content that's openly bashes homosexuality...but they won't exactly of out of their way to join the march, so to speak.
 
Last edited:

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,268
Messages
22,077,233
Members
45,876
Latest member
Crazygamer3011
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"