solidsnake86
Sidekick
- Joined
- Jul 30, 2004
- Messages
- 3,279
- Reaction score
- 170
- Points
- 73
The o
But I do think what happens with the batman sequel in terms of box office success, like all movies, will determine if it continues on. If makes less than the batman, I could see a push to move on from it. With good reason, as there is no sense in investing money in something that makes you less.
The only people that think it's cancelled are the Snyder cult looking to find a villain in Gunn. The batman is the only successful thing DC has had without diminishing returns in years.As others have mentioned, it’s still part of DC Studios. Makes sense why Gunn would debunk it.
It’s funny how just a few months ago there was fear mongering that Gunn cancelled The Batman Part II. Now people are like “why is he answering questions about it, it’s part of the DCU” as if Gunn has zero power lol. Which is it? (And I’m not directing this specifically at you solidsnake, just pointing out the discrepancies in the thought process I’m generally seeing online).
But I do think what happens with the batman sequel in terms of box office success, like all movies, will determine if it continues on. If makes less than the batman, I could see a push to move on from it. With good reason, as there is no sense in investing money in something that makes you less.