Interstellar - Part 8

Status
Not open for further replies.
I saw this Wednesday night and my initial reaction was that it was a horrible experience but that was because of where I saw it at the Tech IMAX in San Jose which is more like a planetarium apparently than a true film screen. Cramped in there like sardines with no room to move or stretch for nearly 3 hrs and all the time having to look straight up to see the movie(no matter where you were sitting) and at no time could you see the entire picture but instead had to keep turning your head to see the edges of the 'screen'. Ugh!!! As soon as I got out of there my reaction was 'F*** THAT MOVIE!!!!' but after calming down I realize that was due to elements extraneous to the film itself. I though the movie itself was decent overall. Not sure what score I'd give it yet. I really should see it properly on a regular actual film screen. This immersive IMAX stuff is for the birds IMO. So if you're in San Jose and are contemplating seeing this at the Tech museum, I'd advise against it.

LOL dude I'm so sorry.

When I was a little kid my parents used to take me to the Tech Museum all the time. I had a terrible time in the dome theater every visit.
 
Who thinks Cooper vs you know who was a better fight scene than Bane vs Batman? At least no rolling punches that miss by five inches.

My theater was laughing so hard during the fight.

Seriously, they were just waddling around in their suits and rolling on the ground. And that shot of them fighting amid the wide, barren landscape made their struggle seem so insignificant.

And those grunting sounds. :oldrazz:
 
Yeah, it's a bad place to see a theatrical feature at.
 
Only pointless if you view applause as something done solely for a performer's benefit. If you look at it as a group of people's way of expressing satisfaction for their own benefit, it makes sense.

Again, different cultures, different attitudes. Move on.
 
So could someone perhaps share the differences between the final film and early scripts? I'm curious to see what changed having never read them.
 
I thought it was good, even though I wouldn't put it on the same level as Inception or The Dark Knight. I enjoyed the first half a lot more than the second, during which I felt like I was watching Nolan's love letter to 2001: A Space Odyssey. It felt a little too long to me as well. As for the positive, the acting was on point, especially from McConaughey, Hathaway and Chastain. The emotional aspect of the film was masterfully crafted, especially during the scene where [BLACKOUT]Cooper watched the video of his kids in the 23 years he missed while on the water planet. [/BLACKOUT] Zimmer's score was amazing as well. I wouldn't call it one of Nolan's best or even a contender for Best Picture this year, but it's still a solid film with spectacular visuals.
 
So could someone perhaps share the differences between the final film and early scripts? I'm curious to see what changed having never read them.
I can, once I get home. :oldrazz: Chris really streamlined it in extremely good ways, I feel. Even if it's little more cheesy.

It actually was more reminiscent of 2001 in some parts than I expected. My husband liked how everyone was really smart. I guess there's usually always one dumb character. :funny:
 
Anyone else feel this won't translate well onto DVD/Bluray? Like Gravity I think the only place to watch this is on the canvas it was intended for.
 
somehow my friend called the ending/twist from the beginning. In the scene where they are walking up the stairs talking about the ghost he leans over and says to me
"I figured it out"
I said what? Not thinking there was anything in the movie to figure out yet, and he says
the ghost is really the father sending a message
After the movie he was all pleased with himself for calling it, but I said there is no way he didn't read that online. That would be like watching star wars, seeing darth vader for the first time, and saying "I got it, thats Lukes dad"

Not too far fetched if you speak german.
 
Thanks Anita, I look forward to seeing the differences :)

And yeah I agree jmc, in fact it's made me hestitant to see it again in a regular theatre purely because of how incredible the experience was in IMAX.
 
I saw this Wednesday night and my initial reaction was that it was a horrible experience but that was because of where I saw it at the Tech IMAX in San Jose which is more like a planetarium apparently than a true film screen. Cramped in there like sardines with no room to move or stretch for nearly 3 hrs and all the time having to look straight up to see the movie(no matter where you were sitting) and at no time could you see the entire picture but instead had to keep turning your head to see the edges of the 'screen'. Ugh!!! As soon as I got out of there my reaction was 'F*** THAT MOVIE!!!!' but after calming down I realize that was due to elements extraneous to the film itself. I though the movie itself was decent overall. Not sure what score I'd give it yet. I really should see it properly on a regular actual film screen. This immersive IMAX stuff is for the birds IMO. So if you're in San Jose and are contemplating seeing this at the Tech museum, I'd advise against it.

Ah shoulda gone to the Mercado in Sunnyvale!

Was a ****ing fantastic IMAX experience. (not to rub salt in the wound)

Just unfortunately $17 a ticket
 
Thanks Anita, I look forward to seeing the differences :)

And yeah I agree jmc, in fact it's made me hestitant to see it again in a regular theatre purely because of how incredible the experience was in IMAX.

I hear ya, a part of me really doesn't want to ruin what I've just seen with an inferior scaled down version. I felt the same with Gravity.
 
So could someone perhaps share the differences between the final film and early scripts? I'm curious to see what changed having never read them.

A handful that I can recall:

They were led to NASA by a probe they found, all the bookshelf and dust message stuff was new.

I believe I recall TARS and CASE being humanoid.

There were aliens that joined together to form larger organisms. On the ice planet, if memory serves.

There was no Dr. Mann. The...I can't recall if it was a person or robot, but the person/robot they found there was from an old Chinese mission with this same purpose. They had conflict with it as well.

Rather than the whole bookshelf thing, Cooper sent the probe from earlier to Earth.

There was a sex scene between Cooper and Brand.

Murph was a boy and had a smaller role.

I don't believe that Caine's Brand had that reveal, seeing as Murph had a reduced role.

Pretty sure I remember Cooper meeting not Murph or Tom but one of their children at the end of their life. I think that was it...can't recall exactly, the last act is where things get fuzzy for me with the differences.

The love stuff wasn't really present.

I seem to remember the ending being just Cooper and TARS going out for adventure rather than going back to Brand on the planet...not so sure about that though, as I said, my memory gets fuzzy as it gets to the end of the script.
 
Last edited:
I don't think it was hard to figure out.

I thought it was going to be either Murph or Cooper sending messages. I think it just comes with the territory now when watching a Nolan movie, that there's gonna be some twist, so now you just look for it or predict it while watching. With Star Wars, you're not really thinking that there will be a twist/reveal at the end, because the series isn't known for those things.
 
I thought it was good, even though I wouldn't put it on the same level as Inception or The Dark Knight. I enjoyed the first half a lot more than the second, during which I felt like I was watching Nolan's love letter to 2001: A Space Odyssey. It felt a little too long to me as well. As for the positive, the acting was on point, especially from McConaughey, Hathaway and Chastain. The emotional aspect of the film was masterfully crafted, especially during the scene where [BLACKOUT]Cooper watched the video of his kids in the 23 years he missed while on the water planet. [/BLACKOUT] Zimmer's score was amazing as well. I wouldn't call it one of Nolan's best or even a contender for Best Picture this year, but it's still a solid film with spectacular visuals.
Oh yeah that was some fantastic acting from McConaughey. He was really stellar in this movie. He owned the character.
Anyone else feel this won't translate well onto DVD/Bluray? Like Gravity I think the only place to watch this is on the canvas it was intended for.
Without having a super powerful home audio system, it probably won't have the same effect as seeing it in the theater
 
I don't think it was hard to figure out.

I thought it was going to be either Murph or Cooper sending messages. I think it just comes with the territory now when watching a Nolan movie, that there's gonna be some twist, so now you just look for it or predict it while watching. With Star Wars, you're not really thinking that there will be a twist/reveal at the end, because the series isn't known for those things.

I honestly didn't see it coming but felt like a complete idiot when that info was revealed.
 
There will always be the one guy saying that he saw the twist coming a mile away anyway ^^
 
Yeah I hope it doesn't hurt reviewings jmc, just thinking right now about how downscaling compared to what I witnessed yesterday would seem like settling for something somewhat inferior. Damn it we need more real IMAX cinemas! :hehe:

Thank you for that Snow Queen. I will say the differences between the two were for the better if a lot of that was the case.
 
I've never seen a movie in IMAX ever. Or 70mm film for that matter I'm sure. I've never found a movie worth the money and time to go to an IMAX theater. But for this movie, I braved the line. I knew that movies like Interstellar were a once in a lifetime opportunity to have a higher cinematic experience. PTA was right, this movie was worth every cent, every moment. Nolan worked me a violin. It was an otherworldly experience, the likes of which I had never felt.

There isn't a lot that you can say about the film that hasn't already been said. McConaughey acts the hell out of this movie as do Chastain, Hathaway, Bentley, Damon, Affleck etc. The acting was phenomenal and by the end of the movie I couldn't cry anymore because I had cried too much during Cooper's departure and viewing of video messages from his family.

The ambition was unbelievable, and seeing it in that gritty 70mm film and IMAX was brilliant. The wormholes, the flights, the new planets, TARS, it was sensational. My jaw was wide-open for about the first two hours of the film at the sheer massiveness of the scope and the visuals. It was awe-inspiring.

I didn't look the love theme being spoon fed to me by Brand and Cooper, as many others have pointed out Nolan's almost sophomoric tendency to go on long-winded monologues to get the themes across and of course, in a film as grand as this you might have to take the time to just explain things for others and keep the foundation of the film intact as it might get away from a filmmakers amidst these outstanding visuals and grand themes of a life in another galaxy. Still, kinda meh on it but didn't detract from the film. I also didn't like the occasional references to a higher being or race. They just kinda asked us to accept that there was a higher power or future race sending us a blackhole and stuff. Not an issue with suspension of disbelief, but rather something that could've been done without if they weren't gonna really deal with the concept of a futuristic race.

TARS was great. A great source of humor in a film that otherwise might be really dark and grim. Mann just made me think that even in a different galaxy, billions of light years away from earth, there are still *****ebags.

You really can't make a film in a vacuum, so any film in space is going to be influenced by the visuals and themes of Blade Runner, 2001, Alien and the like and Interstellar is no exception. That being said, it really was great in spite of those 2001 touches that made me scratch my head a bit.

Some of the early reviews made it seem like the film got away from Nolan a bit, but upon viewing it, I realized that this film is not one to be overly critiqued and scrutinized, but one to be felt. It is intimate, yet grandiose. Awe-inspiring, while never forgetting the awe and inspiration we can receive from a family member or fellow human being. It is a film that makes us realize that the fear of losing a loved one is equal to or greater than the void of space and fear of oblivion. Nolan took us onto a journey towards the furthest corners of human comprehension, and boy was it worth it. Not his best work, but a wholly worthwhile and fulfilling experience on its own.
 
I thought the film dragged, it could have used some editing or rewrites. I thought most of the emotional stuff worked but sometimes it traveled into eye rolling wannabe Spielberg territory. I appreciate Nolan going for a more hopeful and emotional tone for once. I guessed the third act twist before it was revealed, that's rare for me.

The performances were strong, Hathaway and MM were the clear standouts but everybody was good. I liked Zimmer's score but I feel Inception's was better. Obviously the film was well directed and has excellent visuals but that goes without saying really.

I have to say that I don't think the story on it's face was anything super new. It's a nice sci fi story that would have made for a decent 90's Outer Limits episode but my mind wasn't blown by it or anything. I come down on it being a good film and maybe it will get better on a second viewing or worst, I won't be figuring out until it hits DVD/Blu Ray because I'm poor.

Rating: 8/10
 
Last edited:
Spoiler tags man. Please use them for the people who haven't seen it yet.
 
Ah shoulda gone to the Mercado in Sunnyvale!

Was a ****ing fantastic IMAX experience. (not to rub salt in the wound)

Just unfortunately $17 a ticket

That's only $2 more per ticket than at the Tech.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"