kedrell
Fork&SpoonOperator
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2006
- Messages
- 21,379
- Reaction score
- 6
- Points
- 33
So in your scenario, if nothing was done, everything would be fine and nobody would feel the need to leave earth or do anything.
But it's the blight of the crops that forces them to leave, [BLACKOUT]which makes it a paradox if the future humans have to make THAT happen so they can exist at all.[/BLACKOUT]
All you're doing, as far as I can tell, is just moving the goalpost. The outcome is the same. I don't get how that explains anything.
You're not taking into account when you say 'if nothing was done' i.e. if this whole series of events hadn't been set into motion that if the future people caused it(the blight), then that falls under those parameters as well. So there would have been no blight 'if nothing was done' and humanity would have been fine. And in my theory there never was this problem, at least as far as the future people are concerned from looking at their history. Perhaps mankind never left Earth and there was never any need to. But way up in the future they decided that they aren't satisfied(for whatever reason) with how it went and have decided to alter their past for their future benefit. Thus creating the need in the past to advance faster or whatever by leaving and the threat of extinction is just the motivator. My theory is that the future people are the instigators of this entire set of events that we see in the film and not just the way to solve a problem that already existed without their influence.
Last edited: