Really, the "You can't be a true fan and be critical of this" argument? You know I've always wondered, do you have to get a license for declaring who the "true" fans are or is it a hobby you pick up on your downtime? It seems like the kind of thing that should require three years higher education and at least two of sitting through lengthy trails for since you are, in effect, calling out a stranger's personal interests and opinions as being invalid but it seems like these days half the judges are just printing a degree off the internet with no real training at all.
I really hope they do include Wing. Part of it is because they did such a fabulous job with Trish and Jess but other than that, Darcy and Jane (who most fans are unreasonable vile towards), and Simmons and Daisy the MCU is sadly lacking in female friendships. Especially ones where both woman can kick ninja butt side by side, a traditional female-friend-bonding activity that superhero shows have really failed to give me.
Part of me just thinks of Luke, Danny, Misty, and Wing as being a big old family and wants them all together, though.
Fair enough; to your point, from a literal analysis of the base material, I do in fact call myself an expert with my three degrees, two of which include Mechanics of Writing in Liberal Arts and Sciences, and the other in English Education, of which I hold a license with additonal endorsements to teach literature from K-12 and some college courses. I do so admit, however, you are right, I hold neither a masters or doctorate. Silly me.
Still, permit me the moment to educate you on two matters, the first of which is your tone. That is a logical fallacy, called 'ad hominem,' meaning an attack on the speaker and not his message. If you truly just wished to challenge my credentials, do so, and drop the sanctimonious effort that was almost essentially a mirror of my own earlier parlay into degrading rhetoric. Now, if you wish to merely point out that my tone was rude to the poster in question, yes, it was. However, the multiple, previous attempts at logical communication were met with silence until a further chance at later backbiting and whining comments. I lost my patience.
Secondly, the case in point, Captain America leading the Avengers is not racist. If one wanted to argue Steve Rogers as being White would be considered racist, I would argue that it is a matter of historic fact that the powerful majority in 1940s America was white male Christians, who selected Rogers not just as an experiment, but as a symbol. At most, race factors into his selection, but it is no more racist than films such as Selma or American History X. As for Rogers specifically as the leader of the Avengers, even more ludicrous. Rogers held the team together after it fractured, and rebooted within the first 20 issues with an unkillable spirit, and the drive to give second chances to Quicksilver, Hawkeye and Scarlet Witch. It was his soul that gave the team heart then, and his mind and tactical strategy that gave it direction almost constantly since. If you need further evidence of both, read the original Secret Wars series, that displays Cap being the unanimous leader of Marvel's heroes and respected by many viians, not for his race, but his spirit, his drive, his heart. That, good poster, is why calling it racist or insinuating as such is a ridiculous concept, race has nothing to do with his role.
Your second point is agreed upon, fully. Misty and Colleen are just as amazing, and important to my personal viewing, as the friendship between Danny and Luke.