It's a Bird, It's a Plane, It's the Superman Costume Thread! - Part 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
The funny thing is that you and more 2 guys are all alone in this issue lolol it´s just like a movie with the name---> StarvingArtist against the world!!Chill outt bro,you have to embrace the future.... lolololl

The battle is lost my Friend a long time ago loll, You can continue to grumble whatever you want but you know perfectly well that they do not turn back their decisions, if they turn back any decision about the suit is just to get equal to the suit of the film (MOS) therefore don´t get frustrated and missing so much the panties, because they will not come back lololol cheers mate :)

You just received an infraction....if you want to try for a probation, please continue the way you are.

I just warned you earlier today to stop trying to start a fight with people.

And as a reminder to everyone...this http://forums.superherohype.com/showthread.php?t=362659 has been stickied at the top of the page for a year now.
 
I want to see it

Here you go!

imageffw.jpg
 
Sweet! I think it's cool when they do this stuff. Now all they need to do it change the New 52 suit to the MOS version.
russell-crowe-man-of-steel-set-image-3.jpg
 
Sweet! I think it's cool when they do this stuff. Now all they need to do it change the New 52 suit to the MOS version.
russell-crowe-man-of-steel-set-image-3.jpg

I would love if they did that!

While I like the new 52 suit and the nano tech style function it has, I think the MOS suit looks that much better!
 
The battle is lost my Friend a long time ago loll, You can continue to grumble whatever you want but you know perfectly well that they do not turn back their decisions, if they turn back any decision about the suit is just to get equal to the suit of the film (MOS) therefore don´t get frustrated and missing so much the panties, because they will not come back lololol cheers mate :)

HAHAHA!! Terrific :) :up:


Sweet! I think it's cool when they do this stuff. Now all they need to do it change the New 52 suit to the MOS version.

Agreed :) That is pretty cool. Not sure I have to repeat my negativity about the new 52, but I would like to see the MOS suit in comics continuity.

You know what, personally I can't wait for just an entire complete revamp of Superman from the ground up. And btw, to anyone else in the path of hurricane Sandy, be safe, goodnight, and good luck.
 
Last edited:
Sweet! I think it's cool when they do this stuff. Now all they need to do it change the New 52 suit to the MOS version.


Not likely to happen, DC doesn't feel the need to emulate WB. It's just a nod because it's an out of continuity tale. Also we know the New52 suit is likely sticking around until the end of summer. The only viable replacement at this stage is the "Return to Krypton" suit.
 
;) I will leave you alone for NOWW ahahahaha :P
 
SA is not the only one that has these feelings... i feel the same way
 
SA is not the only one that has these feelings... i feel the same way

Thanks Kal. And it isn't just us either. We just post on SHH more then others.

Okay in response to Zionite's original post, here's how this boils down to for me and that'll be it: I love the classic as do innumerable other fans, young and old. WB is a conglomerate intent on making the Superman property more accessible to a certain demographic of people who would otherwise be fans of Superman marginally or not at all. Sure, I accept this as the reality. I'd certainly like Superman to be more popular. I just think the changes they've made are bad. Frankly, I think it's corporately influenced, pandering, hackery and I don't think they enrich the mythos nor make superman any less silly. But that's just me.

For me, it's either classic, or rebuild the Superman mythos from the ground up. But again that's just my perspective as a fan and I recognize that not everyone will agree with me.
 
Last edited:
Hopefully now, this is where SA can now see the divergence amongst "younger" fans. Because despite being of the same age, I happen to disagree with a lot of what you said here.
.
The difference between you and me is that despite being the same age-you are an old fan of Supes-you grew up with him whilst I only started getting into him 3 years ago.You are just as much an old fan as starving artist age withstanding.which is cool but it does mean we will have different views.

I happen to think Earth One is, put kindly, below average. It doesn't explore one iota why Clark wants and thinks he should be Superman. He just sort of does it because his dad said "it'd be cool". He just sort of falls into it after Tyrell's invasion.

I agree about Earth ones faults to the fullest.The characterisation of Clark was aweful and the fact that Clark was forced to become Superman because of an Alien Invasion was disgarceful.But Earth one did have a lot of good in it-Its still a better origin story than Secret Origin.


I abhor Straczynski's "Jim" Olsen. There is modernisation and there is bastardisation. I consider "Jim" the latter. Grant Morrison and the New 52's is much better as a character, he's Clark's (not Superman's) best friend and shares all of Clark's nerdy quirky interests. Plus he still retains the desire to get the best out of his work.
Heres the thing about Jimmy Olsen.Hes either written in a way thats just annoying or tolerable in Morrisons case but never written in a way that he is awesome or Interesting.Which is why welcome Staracysinsky Jim olsen even though he is not faithful to the character. Staracyscykis olsen is hands down the most awesome and interesting Jim olsen I have ever read and will be quite Glad for him to be shown as Supermans best friend.

As for losing the "silliness" I only partially agree. Very partially. Bizarro could do with an updating,
Partially agree that Superman stories should be less silly?Come one!If you want Superman to appeal to the modern audience all sily elemenst shld be rehauled or cast out.
Bizarro needs a serious update no doubt.The Concept of an evil Superman should be a badass villain concept yet Bizarro is potrayed in a silly,campy manner with all the backwards talk and stupidity...words cannot express to you just how turned of I am currently by Bizarro. And he is just one of the silly superman concepts I am talkin about.


The bottle cities should stay. Definitely. As a principle it is more "grounded" than anything else that appears in the Superman mythos. 'Bout to drop some science. Everything you see is mostly empty space, even matter itself, the nucleus makes up over 99.9% of the mass of an atom, but less than 1% of the space. The rest of the atom is empty. It is possible to suggest that Brainiac tech can condense the atom so that a small portion of space is removed from every atom. To put it in perspective, if every single human alive had all the space removed from them, we could all live on a sugar cube. But everything would still weigh the same, explaining the Kandorians weaknesses within the bottle.
When I say bottled cities are silly I mean they appear to be ridiculous-not that they are illogical.For example a man with the ability to fly is equally as fantastical as a man who can fart bombs.Both are equally fantastical,but farting bombs is just sillier.See what I mean

I see no reason why the cities-shrunk-and-imprisoned -in-a-bottle cant be changed to something cities-imprisoned-in-an-alternate dimension.


If in future stories want to go "grounded" and "out there" at the same time, Grant Morrison is the writer to emulate, with his runs on JLA, All-Star and Action. Not Stracyzinski.

Morrison does "out there" very well.But Grounded?Morrison?No.All star is THE most ungrounded Superman story I have ever read.Action attempts to be grounded but really isnt. JLA doesnt give a hoot about grounded just goes with the gods among us angle to fullest.I like Morrison but i know his limitation.

Stracyscinsky does grounded well but i havent seen any that suggest he can be out there.The only writers Ive seen that can go out there and grounded at the same time are Waid and Millar(Millars debatable though).


Thanks Kal. And it isn't just us either. We just post on SHH more then others.

Okay in response to Zionite's original post, here's how this boils down to for me and that'll be it: I love the classic as do innumerable other fans, young and old. .

The fans who love the classic are very numerable as seen by the sales of Supermans books especially pre new 52.The fact that Superman books are constantly whooped by GL and Bat books and actually struggled to be in the top 40 comicbooks pre-52 is a good example.Sales dont lie.

WB is a conglomerate intent on making the Superman property more accessible to a certain demographic of people who would otherwise be fans of Superman marginally or not at all. Sure, I accept this as the reality. I'd certainly like Superman to be more popular. I just think the changes they've made are bad. Frankly, I think it's corporately influenced, pandering, hackery and I don't think they enrich the mythos nor make superman any less silly. But that's just me.
Im not sure what changes you find bad.Sure theyve made some stupid changes new 52 but theyve made some good ones like making Superman act more badass or loosing the trunks.And yes loosing the trunks does make him look less silly.

For me, it's either classic, or rebuild the Superman mythos from the ground up. But again that's just my perspective as a fan and I recognize that not everyone will agree with me.
Rebuildig the Superman mythos is what the new 52 is about
 
Last edited:
The fans who love the classic are very numerable as seen by the sales of Supermans books especially pre new 52.The fact that Superman books are constantly whooped by GL and Bat books and actually struggled to be in the top 40 comicbooks pre-52 is a good example.Sales dont lie.

You can be a Superman fan without being a comics fan. There are a ton of fans of the shows or the movies who have never had a problem with Superman's look. I think your specific demographic is a sliver of Superman fandom.

Im not sure what changes you find bad.Sure theyve made some stupid changes new 52 but theyve made some good ones like making Superman act more badass or loosing the trunks.And yes loosing the trunks does make him look less silly.

:doh: You call Superman acting like an entitled prick, "hip," "cool," "badass," and I call it sell out. You're being pandered to. There are a ton of fictional characters that could be considered "badass" yet still retain their innocence, ethics, and pure spirit. If you ask me, it's not Superman who should be darker... instead it should be the world he exists in. I find stories about characters with uncompromising morals and ethics who exist in an ugly world a lot more compelling then young immature gods with bad attitudes fighting flame monsters and dime a dozen alien invasions.

And no, Superman still wears a blue leotard and a cape. If you honestly think that isn't silly then you're just as blinded by your emotion for the character as I am.

Rebuildig the Superman mythos is what the new 52 is about

Not even close. New 52 is a tweak of the same old Superman universe. Superman doesn't wear the trunks, Clark is a blogger now, the cast is more ethnically diverse, Superman isn't with Lois anymore, etc. I would have respected something very different and creative. Even if it meant Superman no longer having a costume.
 
Last edited:
You can be a Superman fan without being a comics fan. There are a ton of fans of the shows or the movies who have never had a problem with Superman's look. I think your specific demographic is a sliver of Superman fandom.
If Supermans fandom is as big as you think it is,wed be hearing very,very less complaints about his lameness from within and outside comic fandom. Thereve been news articles about his lameness.news-freaking articles.
Weve not had any modern day tvshow movie with the classic suit except SR and we all know how that turned out.Judging peoples present day reactions to the suit by the reactions in older movies/tv shows will be very erroneous.

:doh: You call Superman acting like an entitled prick, "hip," "cool," "badass," and I call it sell out. You're being pandered to. There are a ton of characters from the fiction genre that could be considered "badass" yet still retain their innocence, ethics, and pure spirit.
.
In what way as Morrisons superman lost ethics,pure spirit,or innocence.If anything he retained all this qualities whilst becoming more badass and whether you like it or not badass characters attracts new fans-me proof of that.And there is nothing wrong with pandering as long as it doesnt sacrifice the essence of the character.
And no, Superman still wears a blue leotard and a cape. If you honestly think that isn't silly then you're just as blinded by your emotion for the character as I am.
New 52 or MOS Supermans doesnt wear a leotard and capes look majestic.The trunks look like underwear and many refer it to it has such.The trunks take away from the costume coolness rather than add.

Not even close. New 52 is a tweak of the same old Superman universe. Superman doesn't wear the trunks, Clark is a blogger now, the cast is more ethnically diverse, Superman isn't with Lois anymore, etc. I would have respected something very different and creative. Even if it meant Superman no longer having a costume.
If the superman mythos was as drastically altered as you suggest it wldnt be recongnisable as Superman and wld loose whatever fans that Superman does have.Im actually very suprised that you wld even suggest it.
 
If Supermans fandom is as big as you think it is,wed be hearing very,very less complaints about his lameness from within and outside comic fandom. Thereve been news articles about his lameness.news-freaking articles.
Weve not had any modern day tvshow movie with the classic suit except SR and we all know how that turned out.Judging peoples present day reactions to the suit by the reactions in older movies/tv shows will be very erroneous.

If people had as much of a problem with Superman as you say then SR would have done abysmally rather then been a mediocre success. The lackluster performance of that movie had only so much to do with the costume if at all.

Send me one of the articles.

Smallville fans wanted to see welling in the suit for years and were pissed when all they got was a far away cg shot. It was still the classic costume.

Also, if people remember the old movies fondly still, then why the hell is that erroneous?

In what way as Morrisons superman lost ethics,pure spirit,or innocence.If anything he retained all this qualities whilst becoming more badass and whether you like it or not badass characters attracts new fans-me proof of that.And there is nothing wrong with pandering as long as it doesnt sacrifice the essence of the character.

You're proof of one person who likes new 52.

I'll read your article, you read these reviews:
http://earth616.wordpress.com/2012/04/22/5-reasons-why-the-new-52-sucks-2/

http://www.craveonline.com/comics/reviews/175394-new-52-review-superman-1

http://www.comicsalliance.com/2012/06/05/dc-new-52-sales-bump-data-charts/

New 52 or MOS Supermans doesnt wear a leotard and capes look majestic.The trunks look like underwear and many refer it to it has such.The trunks take away from the costume coolness rather than add.

It's a blue leotard with lines all over it, and welcome to the minority of comic fandom who think capes are cool. If you're going to change the costume to appeal to people who think Superman's costume is lame, I don't think simply getting rid of the trunks is enough. I think you fall in a narrow margin.


If the superman mythos was as drastically altered as you suggest it wldnt be recongnisable as Superman and wld loose whatever fans that Superman does have.Im actually very suprised that you wld even suggest it.

Not necessarily. Not necessarily at all. And why are you surprised? I already said I'm not opposed to change.
 
Last edited:
Meh, I can't really argue with your gut. If you've become accustomed to seeing Superman without the trunks and it's works for you, then you're entitled to it. In the end it does boil down to personal preference. Would you prefer the MOS suit over the classic then? I would venture to say that your opinion speaks more about your flexibility of appreciation then it does quality of design. If you could get used to the MOS suit, you could certainly become used to something with a little red thrown in :) I love the MOS suit, but at the end of the day, to me the classic reigns supreme and damn the trunks haters. What does this do for you guys:

MOS5.jpg

Love it! It goes a bit too high on the side, but pretty good idea, man. :up:
 
The trunks take away from the costume coolness rather than add.

Oh my god lolololololol
Talking to E! Online at the Arthritis Foundation gala in Beverly Hills yesterday, Man of Steel director Zack Snyder was finally quizzed on the question that's been on the mind of many a comic book fan for a while now. Is he interested in also helming a follow-up to the eagerly anticipated reboot? "We like to take it one step at a time and not curse anything," he teased. "It's that kind of thing so we'll see what happens." Fair enough. It's way too early for sequel talk at this point anyway (something which Green Lantern proved pretty quickly when it bombed both critically and financially at the box office last year). As for not giving away anything about the plot, he added, "It's super hard to keep it a secret" and said this about seeing Henry Cavill suit up for the first time. "It was awesome. You look at him and you're like, 'That was a good idea!'" Be sure to sound off with your thoughts on his comments in the usual place and click on the link at the bottom of the page to read more.
Read more at http://www.**************.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=69403#TWZ5H2dJfQWPcGOB.99
 
The trunks take away from the costume coolness rather than add.

Oh my god lolololololol
Talking to E! Online at the Arthritis Foundation gala in Beverly Hills yesterday, Man of Steel director Zack Snyder was finally quizzed on the question that's been on the mind of many a comic book fan for a while now. Is he interested in also helming a follow-up to the eagerly anticipated reboot? "We like to take it one step at a time and not curse anything," he teased. "It's that kind of thing so we'll see what happens." Fair enough. It's way too early for sequel talk at this point anyway (something which Green Lantern proved pretty quickly when it bombed both critically and financially at the box office last year). As for not giving away anything about the plot, he added, "It's super hard to keep it a secret" and said this about seeing Henry Cavill suit up for the first time. "It was awesome. You look at him and you're like, 'That was a good idea!'" Be sure to sound off with your thoughts on his comments in the usual place and click on the link at the bottom of the page to read more.
Read more at http://www.**************.com/fansites/JoshWildingNewsAndReviews/news/?a=69403#TWZ5H2dJfQWPcGOB.99

I respectfully disagree with Zack Snyder on this one. While I like MOS movie costume, it can never beat the classic costume for me.
 
I respectfully disagree with Zack Snyder on this one. While I like MOS movie costume, it can never beat the classic costume for me.

I assumed he was talking more about casting Cavill than the design of the suit.
 
Didn't Dan Didio say in an interview that the classic Superman costume is gone for good?
 
if i had to go with a new costume that wasnt the classic, i would go with this:

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

i know it's an oldie, and it's not originally done by me (the drawing anyways, the colors are, though), but i've always liked this design
 
yet you don't like the MOS suit?

i dont like the MOS suit because the red/blue is unequally balanced... if it were balanced, yes i would like it a lot more. with that saying, there are a lot of great things about the suit... but the lack of red bothers me too much. i'm completely open to a new interpretation, but i would like to see color balance as well.
 
i dont like the MOS suit because the red/blue is unequally balanced... if it were balanced, yes i would like it a lot more. with that saying, there are a lot of great things about the suit... but the lack of red bothers me too much. i'm completely open to a new interpretation, but i would like to see color balance as well.

Agreed, though I'm not that crazy about the cape attachment in the design you posted. A bit too much red up top. The red on the sides reminds me of the hypothetical ultimate Superman

usuperman.jpg
 
that's actually where i got the idea from, for the red on his sides
 
For a film:

New 52's belt thing > No Trunks > Trunks > Red on the Sides

For the comics:

New 52's belt thing > Trunks > No Trunks > Red on the Sides
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,268
Messages
22,076,832
Members
45,876
Latest member
Crazygamer3011
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"