Jared Leto IS The Joker - Part 6

Status
Not open for further replies.
After seeing Quill distracting Ronan with a dance my answer is "Yeah, definitely"
 
"And here's a picture of the Joker!!"

*twitter comments*

"haha! Just kidding...that's not what he really looks like!......." *Scrambles to redesign look.*
 
Wanna know what's ironic?

marilyn-manson-sons-of-anarchy-s7e1.jpg


Even ol' Brian Warner doesn't look like Marilyn Manson anymore.
 
That's because Marilyn Manson wasn't playing himself on Sons of Anarchy.
 
God bless the ignore option. Should use it more often with people like you around.
 
Sure I am. I just ain't agreeing with anything you have to say.

No really, you're just not listening. If you were listening you'd be saying something like "Regardless of the reasons behind these changes, I just don't like the aesthetic."

Instead you're saying "They're going with Gothy Gritty Dudebro Man because it R0KS!!!" even though that convenient ad hominem is at best unprovable and at worst already debunked. People keep offering up new points and instead of answering them you just repeat the same zingers you did in Part 1 as if reiterating it over and over again will eventually make it true.

You see, I'm not a brainless fanboy who just wants to sit in an Ayergasmic echo chamber. I'm interested in opposing ideas. I'd be delighted to hear some new ones, whether I agree with them or not.
 
Last edited:
No really, you're just not listening. If you were listening you'd be saying something like "Regardless of the reasons behind these changes, I just don't like the aesthetic."

Instead you're saying "They're going with Gothy Gritty Dudebro Man because it R0KS!!!" even though that convenient ad hominem is at best unprovable and at worst already debunked. People keep offering up new points and instead of answering them you just repeat the same zingers you did in Part 1 as if reiterating it over and over again will eventually make it true.


Pretty much.
 
No really, you're just not listening. If you were listening you'd be saying something like "Regardless of the reasons behind these changes, I just don't like the aesthetic."

Instead you're saying "They're going with Gothy Gritty Dudebro Man because it R0KS!!!" even though that convenient ad hominem is at best unprovable and at worst already debunked. People keep offering up new points and instead of answering them you just repeat the same zingers you did in Part 1 as if reiterating it over and over again will eventually make it true.

You see, I'm not a brainless fanboy who just wants to sit in an Ayergasmic echo chamber. I'm interested in opposing ideas. I'd be delighted to hear some new ones, whether I agree with them or not.

Eh, don't let it get under your skin.

At this point I'd just ignore the user's posts. That's the way they are going to be so it's useless to hammer in the common sense (what is that? :o )

People are completely entitled to be extreme with their opinion, even if it borders on absurdity and becomes obnoxious. That is unfortunately a role just waiting for a player in every argument ever.
 
I guess it gets under my skin because I see a lot of backs go up the instant someone tries to point out a scuff on their sacred cow when there is plenty of room for constructive criticism, even of the things you love. It's actually a strength to have a generally favorable view of something but still be able to see its flaws. I spend a lot of time defending that point of view against hyper-loyal tribalists who freak out the moment you suggest that maybe the BvS trailer was just a liiiittle bit too dark.

So when people repeatedly offer snark without substance, they may me look bad by association.
 
I'm looking forward to seeing him in costume. Maybe then I can actually reach a conclusion about the design.

Truthfully, I'm having a hard time picturing him in a classic Joker outfit with "Damaged" stamped on his forehead, so I'm curious to see just what exactly this Joker wears.
 
People are allowed to have opinions you do not agree with without being called names for having it. Do not do this again.

To be fair, perhaps he was using it according to its classic Greek word of origin: pathos. Perhaps Keehar is successfully evoking feelings of suffering and sadness in the Angel of Death, which would be quite an accomplishment.
 
I'm looking forward to seeing him in costume. Maybe then I can actually reach a conclusion about the design.

Truthfully, I'm having a hard time picturing him in a classic Joker outfit with "Damaged" stamped on his forehead, so I'm curious to see just what exactly this Joker wears.

from the fanart thread.

dbsrc.jpg


MVO7Qokh.jpg


it makes it almost tolerable .
 
It actually becomes more distracting to me :funny:.
 
It actually becomes more distracting to me :funny:.

I agree with that.
If he sports the face tats in the movie however, Leto's acting and the sheer creepiness of his other features would hopefully balance things out.
 
I'm looking forward to seeing him in costume. Maybe then I can actually reach a conclusion about the design.

Truthfully, I'm having a hard time picturing him in a classic Joker outfit with "Damaged" stamped on his forehead, so I'm curious to see just what exactly this Joker wears.

Hopefully "Damaged" will be gone.
 
CD3GwZ1XIAE5xr9.jpg


This is from New York and is not a set pic!! Just to remind it.

So it appears that the superman shirt was new.. I mean look at his physique here.
 
Guardians of the Galaxy director James Gunn mocking the Joker reveal.

j9mG6zz.png

I can't believe he did this lol. Big thumbs up to him though. My respect for him has gone up several notches.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,348
Messages
22,089,897
Members
45,886
Latest member
Elchido
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"