Gabe99
Sidekick
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2008
- Messages
- 2,472
- Reaction score
- 7
- Points
- 33
Ah, okay. So Legendary isn't actually owned by WB or anything? So, it's about whether or not they will continue to produce films for them.
"Now, I am become Death, the destroyer of producers."Yeah. If Legendary could have enough money I think they would rather be their own studio. But in their position back in the day, they needed to partner up with a studio.
From The LA TIMES May 12, 2011:
'Dark Knight Rises' creates tension between Warner Bros. and Legendary Pictures
Ben Fritz said:Warner Bros. and Legendary Pictures are arguably Hollywood’s most high- profile business partners, having shared in the spoils of such blockbusters as “300” and “The Hangover” and the pain of flops like “Jonah Hex” and “Sucker Punch” over the last six years.
But their long-term partnership has come into question as the companies have for the last few months been discussing the possibility of extending their co-financing and production deal, which expires in 2013. That’s in part because they have also been in heated negotiations over working together on one of the industry’s most highly anticipated movies, next summer’s Batman sequel “The Dark Knight Rises,” according to knowledgeable people who declined to be identified because the talks are confidential.