• Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.

Mad Max: Fury Road - Part 3

Status
Not open for further replies.
MAD MAX: FURY ROAD is a film that has a lot of hype behind it. General excitement was buzzing right from the point this film - which had been in various stages of pre-production from as early as 1999! - was finally actually getting made, then the buzz grew with the awesome teaser trailer, and it reached fever pitch when that incredible full trailer hit a month or so back. And the reviews coming in have been near uniformly euphoric, paired with incredibly strong word-of-mouth... it all makes you think the levels of anticipation behind this were almost too high for the film to possibly live up to. I've grown wary of the dangers of expectation when long-dormant franchises are revived for sequels, even when the original directors return like with Steven Spielberg for INDIANA JONES AND THE TEMPLE OF THE CRYSTAL SKULL or Ridley Scott for PROMOTHEUS. You watch the trailers, and you get your hopes up that they have somehow managed to recapture the spirit of the earlier classics... only for the end product to disappoint. This is not the case with FURY ROAD, which finally arrives over 30 years since the last entry in the MAD MAX series, BEYOND THUNDERDOME. Not only has George Miller managed to live up to the magic of his original trilogy with this latest entry, but he's actually surpassed them to push the saga to whole new heights.

Much like previous series high-watermark, THE ROAD WARRIOR, the plot of FURY ROAD is utterly minimal, stripped right down to the bare components to make this a ruthlessly efficient narrative engine. Our eponymous hero Max, now played by Tom Hardy, is captured and taken captive by the forces of Immortan Joe, a warlord who rules an oppressed society with an iron fist by hoarding the local water supply. When Charlize Theron's Imperator Furiosa absconds from Joe's Citadel in a massive war rig with his five young slave-brides in tow, a furious Immortan Joe summons an army to give pursuit through the desert wastelands, with Max dragged along for the ride. And with that brief set-up taken care of relatively quickly, the rest of the movie is one massive extended chase sequence. Even in the quieter moments of downtime, focusing on character development, the film lets us know that Joe and his War-Boys are still giving chase, even if our heroes have got enough distance ahead of them to allow for a momentary breather. It's a basic plot, but it's the execution that makes it astounding, because... oh boy, what a chase!

I recall being very pleased by THE WOLF OF WALL STREET last year, because it showed that - even with a whole new generation of filmmakers who have pretty much crafted a career out of being inspired by him - Martin Scorsese, even at his advanced age, can still turn on top gear and do the style of cinema he innovated better than anyone, leaving his pretenders in the dust. And here, 70-year-old George Miller shows that the same very much applies to him. The best part of 20 years spent making cuddly family films with talking animals hasn't numbed the Australian auteur's ability to craft explosive action mayhem as well as anyone.

I think many moviegoers of my generation and older have had the feeling when watching action films of today, particularly ones built around car chases, that they just don't have that same visceral quality we remember from our formative films, like something is now lacking. But in FURY ROAD, Miller has managed to recreate that magical feeling. And I think a big part of that is that CGI and green-screen has largely been eschewed in favor of location shooting and actual stunt work. Of course, there is some CGI touching up and additional effects added, but these are real vehicles going boom, and as a viewer, you can feel the difference, it gives proceedings more weight and makes you feel more immersed. When the "pole-cat" War-Boys vault from vehicle to vehicle on giant bouncy poles, it's all the more breathtaking because you know it was actually done on moving vehicles by Cirque do Soleil performers. Credit is also due here to cinematographer John Seale and editors Margaret Sixel and Jason Ballantine, who along with Miller avoid the trapping of lesser car chases of constant quick cuts that make the carnage ultimately empty and numbing, instead giving us a wide canvas to let the mayhem unfold, imbuing each vehicle with presence and personality that lets us clearly follow its course through each sequence, and having everything be driven in raw, visual narrative: the action here isn't a break from the story, it IS the story. FURY ROAD does for car chases what THE RAID did for hand-to-hand combat.

But it's not just in the action where Miller excels. Something that really helps to set this apart from your average blockbuster is how idiosyncratic and the product of a singular artistic vision it is. The MAD MAX series has always been a bit of an oddball, eccentric mythology, and that continues here on a massive scale. You really get the sense that George Miller has crafted a vast world with a history and culture we'll only know a fragment of, and we've just been thrown into the middle of it, with all these wonderful details that you imagine Miller knows extensive information about and which was thoroughly developed, but which we only see for a fleeting moment in the background, adding color. One example: the heroes drive the war rig through rotten marshland, and in the foreground we see old men walking on all fours on massive stilts through the quicksand-like mire: never explained, but it's a wonderful flourish.

I think some MAD MAX films were more successful than others, but what none of them were ever lacking in was inventiveness and imagination. But it's the kind of deeply strange high concept world-building that I can't quite believe was given such a massive budget to be a tentpole blockbuster by a major Hollywood studio. This is a film where one of the many vehicles in the villain's fleet is a massive stage, with a masked lunatic called The Doof Warrior hanging from a bungee cord, playing an electric guitar that also blasts flames with each power chord, which acts as the soundtrack of the film. Basically: FURY ROAD is, in the best possible way, utterly demented.

The dialogue here is very sparse, characters played in broad shades, and some might think that would mean there's no room for great performances, but I'd disagree. Tom Hardy is on great form. I've seen some say he pales in comparison to Mel Gibson, and of course Mel is the iconic Max, but Hardy brings his own energy to the role to give it a unique spin. His Mad Max leans more heavily on the "mad" part of the equation, less the weathered cynic Gibson portrayed than someone who seems to have been reduced by the world around him to being near animal-like, all grunts and wild, darting eyes... an effect enhanced by the fact he wears a metal muzzle across his face for the first segment of the film. The flashbacks to his tortured past here are sped-up flashes that feel like crazed fever dreams, creating a sense of trippy hysteria that puts us in his unhinged mindset.

But it's Charlize Theron who steals the show as Furiosa. Stoic and badass, but betraying moments of pain and heartbreak with just her face, we learn relatively little of her backstory or motives, and yet we get a pretty firm idea of the life Furiosa has led based on Theron's performance. Just as she inspires those around her in the film to follow her, Furiosa also inspires us to emotionally invest in her and her mission, and really do as an audience. And yet it never feels like a self-conscious "ass-kicking woman!" role, she's just a strong character regardless of gender, someone presented in a lot of ways as a mirror of Max, but maybe just a little less broken. Max sees that, unlike him, she is still capable of hope, and he helps her out of a desire to see that hope kept alive as much as anything else. With this role, Theron can proudly stand Furiosa alongside the likes of Linda Hamilton's Sarah Connor and Sigourney Weaver's Ellen Ripley in the canon of great action movie heroines.

I may have singled out Hardy and Theron, but really, every part - large and small - is pitch-perfect. Nicholas Hoult does career best work as fanatical war-boy Nux, playing someone deranged and dangerous, and yet deeply damaged by circumstance so you can't help but feel some compassion for him. Hugh Keays-Bryne - villain Toecutter in the original MAD MAX - returns here to play another remarkably odious monster of a villain in Immortan Joe. And yet, as utterly vile and without redeeming qualities as he is, and as reprehensible as his treatment of his "brides" may be, there are even moments where you almost see the rotten, twisted shred of what's left of his humanity underneath the armor and horrifying mask. Even the various smaller parts - from imbecilic man-child henchman Rictus Erectus to the women of the Vuvalini tribe - have little moments where they shine. Again, it's a beautifully-realised world down to every detail, including the characters.

Really, just about every aspect of this film I could write a paragraph praising. The one other thing I want to give special mention to is the soundtrack, performed by Junkie XL (with the occasional enhancement from The Doof Warrior!), which acts as a thundering, pulse-pounding heartbeat for the movie... rousing stuff. The film really manages to be a delight for the ears as well as the eyes.

In closing, here is what I believe is the biggest compliment I can bestow upon MAD MAX: FURY ROAD. When I was a young kid, and I experienced the MAD MAX movies for the first time, I remember thinking of the climactic chases of THE ROAD WARRIOR and BEYOND THUNDERDOME (I didn't catch the first film until I was a little older) as being impossibly huge, the biggest action spectacle my young eyes had ever witnessed. Even as I generally forgot the movies as a whole, those sequences stuck with me, and inflated the MAD MAX series in my mind as a dizzying benchmark for cinematic action sequences, sheer death-defying, breath-caught-in-your-throat event cinema. And I've rewatched those films recently, and I still admire those sequences, and I still think THE ROAD WARRIOR is a great film, but it isn't as impossibly huge as you remember it being as a kid: with the experience of an adult, you can look at those sequences and see the age, and the points where the budget was pushed to the limit. Though of course you still admire the great technical achievement. So, here's the compliment... MAD MAX: FURY ROAD feels like that impossible spectacle of a film that I remembered the earlier MAD MAX films being from my early experience of seeing them in my formative years.

MAD MAX: FURY ROAD is an action masterpiece. Go see it, and, trust me on this, go see it in the cinema. Don't wait for DVD, PLEASE don't torrent it onto your computer. This is a film that should be seen on as big a screen as you can find. If at all possible, see it in 3D IMAX, it's worth it. An exhilarating experience, one that had me on the edge of my seat and gasping with awe throughout. This, for me, is pure cinema.


10/10
 
I just came back from seeing this again.

I'm gonna get the sequel made all by myself. Forget ya'll.

:cmad:

Also, with every viewing my love for Hardy's performance only grows. Hnnngh.
 
Last edited:
Same. I really think Hardy and Theron both do a lot more with their seemingly limited material than a lot of actors would have.
 
I wish they had stuck with Mel. The movie was awesome but Tom Hardy's performance was a little weird for me.

I loved Hardy in the role, I loved his weirdness and how he made the role his own, but I think Mel Gibson as an aged Max is also perfect for this movie.
 
Never would have guessed this film would be getting these positive reviews. I've never seen the original, but I'm going to see this new one on Tuesday with a buddy of mine. Pretty stoked.
 
I loved Hardy in the role, I loved his weirdness and how he made the role his own, but I think Mel Gibson as an aged Max is also perfect for this movie.

Gibson in that entire opening sequence would have been too much for me to handle.
However, I'm not sure it would have been wise for WB.
 
And you've deemed yourself the arbiter?
I just find these sorts of statements fall into the "they should fund the type of art I like vs what the masses are liking" and I'll top it off with talks of justly and mediocrity.
It's art man.

There's someone out right right now saying the same thing about films with babes and explosions vs tripod arthouse movies and what he wants to see the studio pour 150mill into.

It's not about me, it's about the consensus we come to. Good art should be rewarded.
 
I give the movie..

9/10

I love Hardys' Max. While Mel's Max as a cunning Fox, Tom's Max is a starving Wolf who has forgotten how it is to be...normal. So I think that's what some folks aren't getting. His spin on the character is that he's almost..caveman like. He's lost so much of his humanity that it's hard for him to even talk.
 
Gibson in that entire opening sequence would have been too much for me to handle.
However, I'm not sure it would have been wise for WB.

I think it would have interested a lot more of the general audience though. And the thought of seeing Mel's Max teaming up with Theron's Furiosa: :hmr:
 
I think Mel's Max would've been so different from Tom's Max that the movie may have ended way more differently. We can't help it but to compare Mel's Max with Tom's, but Tom's version is so...different. Much more feral, much more insane. Both are great performances.
 
Last edited:
"We" is the public. If a movie makes money, the consensus is there to make more movies like it. If the movie loses money, then studios have no reason to give people more of that.

If you ask me, Shane Curruth (Primer, Upstream Color) is one of the best writers/directors in sci fi. I far prefer his work over action films like Mad Max or Star Trek. But do his films make money?? Not really...so I can't possibly expect studios to throw 200 million dollars at him. I'm not egotistical enough to think that my opinion is more "correct" than everyone else's. I'm also not so drunk as a fanboy that I will pass off that his movies are exciting or fast paced, so I won't give a review of his movies claiming that they are.
 
ZOMG THIS MOVIE.

:woo: :woo: :woo:

George Miller is definitely showing every other action director how it's done. Not a wasted scene or shot in this film. My favorite aspect of it is that he managed to give even minor characters individual personalities and motivations (something The Dark Knight also does), and SHOW them through a 2-hr runtime, which is short for action films nowadays. The important part is that he SHOWs mainly through actions and reactions (and during basically an extended chase scene!), not through empty, plot-less scenes of dialogue. Simply masterful.

And if giving stereotypical "damsels" personalities, motivations, and yes, ROLES to do in an action movie is man-hating feminazi-ism, count me in on this war rig. :awesome: It felt real, that the protagonists would do away with preordained roles (gender roles, societal roles, etc) and just do what needs to get done to survive in such a world.

LOVED when Max passes Furiosa the sniper rifle without nary a complaint or eyeroll, because he thinks she can do the job better.

For me, the warring factions weren't just about gender roles, but pre-assumed societal and individual roles and images as well. Max deems himself a Lone Wolf just out for himself, until it finally hits him that he needs to help ([blackout]when Splendid goes into labor suddenly[/blackout]) Nux's arc is getting out of thinking himself a War Boy merely to do Immortan Joe's bidding.

In that vein, the resourceful women in this film are a stark contrast to the OTT showmanship of Immortan Joe's war party. ("One man, one bullet" vs the constant wasting of ammo on the other side...as well as Guitar Guy...) Maybe that's matriarchy vs patriarchy, but for me, it was more resourcefulness, survival, and ethics vs Kim Jong Un's North Koreanesque power and excess.


Also....Guitar Guy. I cannot get over the amazingness of Guitar Guy. Another example of Miller's mastery. He could have just been a one-time gag for one-time laughs, but the fact that he's a running gag throughout the whole thing, with perfectly-timed appearances - AMAZING.

If you are a fan of action movies, or just well-done storytelling and vaguely like explosions, YOU MUST SEE THIS FILM.
 
I absolutely love Mel Gibson's Mad Max, and The Road Warrior I think is a classic. But, my first gut reaction is to say this was the best Mad Max film to date.
 
Has anyone seen this stupid as heck meme from the MRA?

b8SDmR5.jpg
 
The whole apocalyptic aesthetic can be very hit and miss for me. I actually had no real interest in seeing Mad Max simply because it didn't really seem like my cup of tea. Haven't seen the originals either. But after the RIDICULOUSLY POSITIVE reviews and the goading of my friends, I decided to check it out.

I'm glad I did.

Solid movie and with seriously some of the best action sequences i've seen on film in YEARS. Very impressed. Story was pretty straightforward but they kept it compelling nevertheless.
 
That's weird how the pic doesn't appear in your post, Titansupes.
 
The movie doesn't bash men. It bashes crazy dictators with harems of sex slaves.
 
It's been a while since I've wanted to see a movie in the theaters again this badly.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"