What happened? Loeb's
Hulk started selling like 100,000 copies
every issue. This is a hell of our own design.
Take some heart that this "hell of our own design" is ending. As of Jan. 2010, Loeb's HULK sold at 54,266 copies; almost half what it sold, say, a year and change ago. The months of it selling 100k, or even 70k, appear to be over. HULK was steady for a while, but after about issue 12 or so has been unable to hang onto sales. Maybe retailers and readers saw Loeb was jerking them along with Red Hulk. Maybe paying $4 a month for endless splash panels bringing you maybe 16 panels of story was too much pain for both to absorb. But at any rate, Loeb's HULK has been falling.
Comic sales overall are down 7-8% from 3 years ago, as evidenced by the fact that UNCANNY X-MEN sold just over 65k and yet was still a Top 10 seller; in 2007, virtually all books in the Top 10 sold over 85k at least. While the era of $3.99 books have allowed comics to survive 2009 (a year in which many newspapers and magazines died or severely contracted), now it might be the start of a slow decline that was inevitable.
Pak's INCREDIBLE HULK sells roughly 10k less than Loeb's HULK. Given this data, expanding into a FALL OF THE HULKS saga is ironic as the Hulks ARE falling; sales wise. Now may NOT be the best time to demand more book purchases out of the readers. Now would be the time to trim fat and retrench.
But, Marvel under Joe Quesada, while it has seen many successes, one major flaw is being quite slow to realize when a strategy is either not working or back firing, and to change course mid-storm. I can think of some easy examples. The exercise in arranging Storm's marriage to Black Panther to try to lift his book in terms of rep and sales had zero effect; BLACK PANTHER continued to fade in sales without crossovers (even worse than MS. MARVEL) while Storm spent much of a two year period outside the X-Men titles as a regular character where she is popular, lowering her stock considerably. A second example actually concerns Wolverine; in spite of the fact that WOLVERINE: ORIGINS was a book that had to end eventually and that Wolverine, since even 2007, hasn't been "hot" enough that a random Wolverine one-shot or mini sells as well as it used to in, say, 2001, decided to try to shift WOLVERINE into Daken's book as "DARK WOLVERINE" and to make the Aaron/Garney WOLVERINE: WEAPON X at $3.99 a pop the lone Logan book, with WOLVERINE: ORIGINS as Logan's B-book. The exercise has backfired; DARK WOLVERINE has faded in sales every month since the end of Millar's out of continuity tale. WOLVERINE: WEAPON X after a good launch has tumbled down the Top 100 like it was a water slide, selling below WOLVERINE: ORIGINS. That is itself outside the Top 50, which is amazing since books that sold at least 36k were within the Top 50 for Jan. 2010. So the end result of the whole Daken/Logan switch is now Logan is selling at his lowest numbers in publication history. AVENGERS: THE INITIATIVE, a book Marvel feels needs to be relaunched, outsold not one, but TWO Wolverine titles in Jan. 2010, both starring Logan. While as a fan I am pleased, that should be seen as a massive embarrassment by editorial. In a time when Wolverine's rep seems to be something Marvel relies on, Marvel is on the verge of turning him into Punisher or Ghost Rider; through bungles and overexposure, making him so toxic that he needs a rest for several years, and even then might not be cleansed. Deadpool, with 3 ongoings and at least twice as many guest appearances, it seems, is on the verge of that era as well.
Marvel won't see these examples for what they are. The Joe Q way is, "life is so hectic we can't obsess over failures, we just have to keep cranking out product". And while that is a fair point, if one never looks over failures, or is even willing to admit any, one never learns from them.
(Jan. 2010 sales numbers here -
http://www.icv2.com/articles/news/16810.html )