well I'm some thought it . if that ever happened. lol That's more something you'd see some one say that on family guy, with stewie saying it in a skit or it being on some random character on the simpsons.
I've been playing a lot of multiplayer. I'm like 6 hours into the campaign but can't shake my Shepard not looking like she used to. I will probably keep going since who knows when Bioware will fix that bug, but it won't be the same.
When did Hudson say that? We talking about at the start of development or towards the end? If its the former then no big deal, things change in a long dev cycle. If it's the latter, well then, shame shame shame.
I was thinking about it more and as much as I loathe the ending as is, I would be ok (not happy, but ok) with how it ended if it weren't for this one little thing:
It seems like at the end, when 3 of your crew exit the Normandy, one of those 3 is somebody you took with you on that suicidal run down to the beam. Can anyone else confirm that happened to them as well?
There is no way the Normandy could have picked them up. Of all the mind-boggling s**t in the end this bothers me the most. I can't overlook this because it's deliberate, and it seems to be an extra "WTF" moment for everybody.
And I know I said that one thing but the catalyst speaking being a mixture of 3 voices... I listened to it on YouTubes and I'm gonna crank up the volume when I'm done with my insane playthrough: You'll hear Jennifer Hale in your left ear, Mark Meer in your right. The middle is the child's voice. The whole thing is just too f**king weird.
is it just me.. Or does anyone else think that the Star gaizer scene looks like it could take place in the same planet the Normandy lands on.. What with the two "moons" and all.
I also agree with MC.. I think it's obvious that we're going to get a continuation from the ending with DLC. My Shepard didn't [BLACKOUT]start to breath again[/BLACKOUT] for nuttin'!
It'd be kind of neat to see it turned into some kind of governmental house. Theoretically in such a case should she have survived, EDI could still be hanging around.
she'd be like that l lady director in ware house 13 only she won't be an immortal human attached to the place. some like a care taker I guess. it'll still be interesting
That would be pretty cool, it'd be neat for her to have gotten humor down pat in the interim.
Looks like the company is starting to interact with the posters on the Bioware forums over the whole ending thing.
[Stanley Woo wrote...] We always listen and consider what our community has to say. We have been listening the entire time. That does not mean, however, that we are obligated to respond, to agree with you, or to develop the game to please you.
We have a lot of people giving us feedback, and due to the diverse nature of our fanbase and community, there are a lot of different opinions and suggestions floating around, and some of it will be contradictory. I encourage all those giving us feedback to consider that the game has only been out a short time and that it does take time to consider all the feedback coming at us. Thank you all for your enthusiasm and support (and criticism).
So it looks like Bioware's starting to react. Nothing might come of it, they might just be taking notes for their future work but just putting it out there.
Man...I wish the Collector assault rifle was in the core game. Now that you can equip one weapon (if you want to), it'd match the Collector armor perfectly.
I have no need for it I got that when I got the collector for ME2worked best with armor piercing and shredder bullets.I don't know why them and the Prothens don't have pistols though or SMG's. well I mean I would love to have gotten those off Javik too.
The Collector rifle sucked in ME2, it had a ****** magazine and no damage. But with all the upgrades you can make and purchase in ME3, it'll undoubtedly be much better to use. That's why I'm upset you can't use it in single player.
I've been reading some of that and Bioware's response to some of it is insane.
One guy tweets them about how the endings sucked because they are mostly the same, lack of choice, "light beams" and whatnot. Then the Bioware person replies, "Well what did you want out of the ending?" or something thing like that.
Like...really? Really? I understand that Twitter isn't the right venue to have a protracted discussion about the ending and the person manning the account is probably being quizzical because they want feedback, but it's almost like they can't understand why someone might be the tiniest bit upset about it.
The Collector rifle sucked in ME2, it had a ****** magazine and no damage. But with all the upgrades make and purchase in ME3, it'll undoubtedly be much better to use. That's why I'm upset you can't use it in single player.
That's odd, I mean I have it for single player. or should. I haven't been using it but I should. all of the weapons you got in the second game if you bought the collectors or other wise how ever you got it should have imported.
Are you saying you had it for ME2 and can't play it for sp in your play throughs?
I think you're putting too much stock in that, what is the person manning that - PR? They're just trying to get as much as info as they can. I'd rather they ask questions than not.
That's odd, I mean I have it for single player. or should. I haven't been using it but I should. all of the weapons you got in the second game if you bought the collectors or other wise how ever you got it should have imported.
Are you saying you had it for ME2 and can't play it for sp in your play throughs?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.