Yeah, because Cyclops is soooooooo hard to cast![]()
Right. But this is a speculation thread. Isn't this how it has always worked at the Hype? The point of these threads, when there is no news, is for fans to speculate/fantasise about the possibilities with other fans. That's why I joined and why I keep coming back. It's a lot of fun to me. I understand if others just want to wait for official confirmations and not engage before that.
Sure, it's easy to find someone who looks the part. That's why I've never understood people who thought James Marsden was a great pick based on his looks alone. Yes, he looked a lot like the Scott Summers from the comics, but, then again, so did Eric Bana when he wore those same red shades in Black Hawk Down.Yeah, because Cyclops is soooooooo hard to cast![]()
If I had to pick a thirtysomething Henry, I think I'd go with Golding.Henry Cavill would make a great Cykes.
I’m still crossing my fingers for Emma Watson as Jean Grey.
Then let's discuss why it would or wouldn't happen, but if we're gonna limit ourselves to "we don't know what's gonna happen", there's no point in posting in this thread anymore.Yes of course. But it's still premature to say with any certainty we are going to see Marvel/Rogue/Mystique done a certain way. I doubt Marvel would want to put their new big female action hero out of commission that way.
I don't think anyone can have certainty about anything regarding MCU X-Men at this point. Feige should have an open book to use as he sees fit. But speculation about Rogue and CM is a natural thing to expect in a thread like this at a time when there is no info at all. I find it fun to talk about even if it never happens and if there is never any hint of it happening. And just on this particular topic, if it were to happen I don't expect CM to be out of commission at all as she will be a leading light for the MCU at the time of a sequel. But she can still go into a coma with her entire sleep period being skipped over offscreen. That way you don't miss a beat with her and also have serious character material for her own development and solo films. This Rogue connection is the kind of thing that will get brought up due to comics history but I think everyone here knows that at present we have no real clue as to anything that will happen.Yes of course. But it's still premature to say with any certainty we are going to see Marvel/Rogue/Mystique done a certain way. I doubt Marvel would want to put their new big female action hero out of commission that way.
But we both know this is not the main reason why people are excited over this deal. The X-Men being integrated into the wider Marvel universe, having crossovers with other Marvel heroes is a major selling point of this acquisition.
I think as the MCU continues to grow there will be room for separate Avengers and X-Men events, and then entire MCU events.
Pretty simple way to do it: start from the beginning. Xavier's first class of X-Men formed in real time. No Sentinels, no Morlocks, no Magneto, no secret Genosha paradise. None of that in the first movie. Mutants are basically a new phenomenon. That's the most simple, non-convoluted way to introduce these characters without retcons and plot holes that don't make sense. It doesn't have to be as complicated as many make it out to be.This is why I think there's a bit of support for the MCU X-Men to be in their own universe with occasional crossovers via doctor strange opening a portal or something. The x-men is a huge franchise with the potential hundreds of spin-offs of its own I do wonder how they'll introduce them without making it feel convoluted or without retcons.
And I don't disagree on that front. But it really depends on how big of a threat the antagonist is. Apocalypse sabotaging Ship/sending the Dark Riders after the X-Men and trying to kill Nathan Summers could be a self-contained story that doesn't require interference from other heroes (even though Captain America and the F4 briefly appeared in Endgame)I won't drag this too much because we disagree. I just want to make clear I'm not arguing the mutant universe should be a separate thing. They can interact with each other all the time: Beast in Avengers, Carol vs Rogue, Logan and Hulk, Xavier and the Illuminati, etc... I'm simply arguing that I believe the mutants heroes deserve the spotlight without having to share it with now huge stars like Avengers or Guardians. I don't remember the Avengers fighting Apocalypse or Sinister. IMO, the X-Men big villains should be saved for X-Men/mutant crossovers. When the spotlight is on them only. I do think they deserve that. As I think the Avengers deserve their stories without involving the entire MCU.
I want to see all of these stories adapted too. Especially Mutant Massacre and Fatal Attractions. And they can, without the Avengers getting involved, because the lot of these stories don't have world-ending stakes except maybe Fall of Mutants and Inferno. X-Cutioner's song is mostly a self-contained story with various mutant factions as is Mutant Massacre. X-Men: inferno, however, DID have involvement from all of the major heroes in NYC when Wiz Kid opened the portal from Limbo. So that could potentially serve as a major crossover event for the MCU.want to see mutant crossover events like Mutant Massacre, Fatal Attraction, Inferno, X-Cutioners Song, Fall of Mutants and others... Stories that involve mutant heroes only and put the spotlight on them. We can have crossovers involving the entire MCU with more proper stories like Secret Wars or something like that. But allow the mutants have their own spotlight. They're great.
I disagree. The core heart of Civil War (Rogers and Bucky) was not lost because it was a major crossover event for the MCU. It was still very clearly a Captain America movie. Infinity War wasn't a watered down Avengers movie because the Guardians, Strange and Wakanda was involved. As long Marvel keeps the focus of Dark Phoenix on Jean's downfall and the emotional turmoil it inflicts on the X-Men, tearing the team apart -- it will not be ruined. If anything, having the Avengers fight the X-Men over the fate of Jean makes the story more impactful because it once again reinforces the "Us against them" philosophy of the franchise. The X-Men being the only group to truly care about mutant issues and the Avengers becoming an extension of the Government that is persecuting them.And yeah, as big of a threat as Phoenix can be, if ever done in the MCU, it should be an intimate story involving the X-Men. Throwing the entire MCU against Phoenix would ruin the story, IMO.
I haven't seen Beale Street, but I watched an interview of her and I think I like her for Storm. She has that regal look to her and a strong voice. It's not Angela Bassett, but it could work.Somebody suggested her for Storm earlier this year but Kiki Layne is gaining a lot of notoriety with her breakout performance in Beale Street. Wouldn't be surprised if she gains Marvel's attention.
This is why I think there's a bit of support for the MCU X-Men to be in their own universe with occasional crossovers via doctor strange opening a portal or something. The x-men is a huge franchise with the potential hundreds of spin-offs of its own I do wonder how they'll introduce them without making it feel convoluted or without retcons.
And they can, without the Avengers getting involved, because the lot of these stories don't have world-ending stakes except maybe Fall of Mutants and Inferno.
I disagree. The core heart of Civil War (Rogers and Bucky) was not lost because it was a major crossover event for the MCU.