Spidey220987
Sidekick
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2006
- Messages
- 1,115
- Reaction score
- 39
- Points
- 33
Which he ironically didnt appear in lol, but more than likely will show up in Avengers 4
You are correct, I also watched the trailers before watching it and didnt see that scene either, so I wonder why it was cut.
"We put together this big, giant film and we were testing the movie, we tested it four times before we finally finished it, and there was just so much action in the movie. We had to choose what was going to stay and what will go," he noted.
Fortunately all that effort that went into shooting those major action sequences won't go to waste, as McQuarrie promised that we'd see "glimpses of some of that stuff" on the home release.
Speaking of Brandt, I expected him to be revealed as a traitor in the fifth installment because he was the only other person who knew that
Julia was alive.
It might have made his character a bit more interesting.
I could be wrong about that, though.
Which he ironically didnt appear in lol, but more than likely will show up in Avengers 4[/QUOTE
I did a little digging.
At the time, they couldnt give Marvel any specific dates on when they would need Renner for Fallout because the script wasnt finished.
Shouldn't crashing into that truck really kill Ethan Hunt?
No because of Scientology![]()
The safety harness he was wearing probably helped, too.
There is footage of him wearing it online.
There were a lot of things in this movie that should have killed him. My biggest peeve was the same as in Rogue Nation when crashing a motorcycle at that speed with no helmet isnt something you walk away from.
Plot questionWho stole the plutonium in the first place? Was it the apostles? This is where I was getting confused because I thought Walker was legitimately looking for it during the movie
That is true.
But if these films stuck to reality than Ethan would have been killed when Phelps kicked him off the side of the train.
No to mention when the helicopter exploded.
It was them at the beginning, sure they confirmed it later on whenWalker revealed himself unintentionally to the disguised Benji-as-Solomon Lane to be the real John Lark and the deal was hed get him the plutonium and frame Hunt
Thats what Im trying to sort out. The apostles stole the plutonium. Then they set it up so IMF would think they were selling it to John Lark, knowing the IMF team would try to capture him. They also knew Hunt would impersonate Lark at some point, and use him to bust out Lane, and frame Hunt for the whole thing?
Which is why I think RN was slightly better. The story was more straightforward while still having some mystery with Ilsa.
I would say no it's not. All the movies are basically the Tom Cruise show. But the supporting characters at least get to do things and have some cool action moments.
I mean the last two movies both scored high reviews on Rotten Tomatoes, 93%. It was only the earlier movies when critics weren't so enamored with them.
This seems fairly consistent since the franchise made a comeback with Ghost Protocol, IMHO the first one to really get it right.
Also, I think the combination of Cruise, McQuarrie, Ferguson, Pegg, and Rhames all work very well. Renner not so much. This is really the only franchise Cruise really seems to "get" ATM.
I think McQuarrie emphasizes the team aspect more than any others, including in Ghost Protocol which he co-wrote. I think both the climaxes of Rogue Nation and especially Fallout emphasize a team dynamic more than the first four films.
Which is why I think RN was slightly better. The story was more straightforward while still having some mystery with Ilsa.