Did we need to see the earth nuked in the comics to know that Pheonix could do anything she wanted? No. She showed her power in other ways. The movie didn't even bother to. You're being ridiculous by basing everything on someone's word. Just because I say "This guy's so powerful he can do anything he wants." does not mean literally he can imagine something and poof it's there. If that were the case she'd just bring Cyclops back to life since she was so distraught over his death. Saying someone is the most powerful being in the universe is one thing but I bet if anyone tried to describe a planet eating monster to Professor Xavier he'd just laugh and say no more froot loops before bed.
First you ask why we didn't see limitless power, then you say we didn't need to see the earth nuked. You can't have it all ways. There's no way this movie was going to show 'limitless power', especially when she hadn't attained it fully. She's only beginning to get going at the end of the movie on Alcatraz, when she raises Phoenix-like talons of water hundreds/thousands of feet in the air around the island and destroys hundreds of soldiers.
Remember, Jean's full power (locked away by Xavier) developed a malevolent personality (Phoenix). Jean could only safely control a part of it. When Jean Grey tried to wield all that power she suddenly had access to, in order to block and cancel Cyclops' eye blasts at the lake, she killed Cyclops. The Phoenix personality that came with the power was then reborn and fighting for control. If it wanted to bring Cyclops back, it would have done. Jean by herself was not capable of wielding/controlling that level of power, it was her Phoenix alter-ego that did. (In an early script version, Mystique died and was later restored out of thin air by Phoenix for a griefstricken Magneto... yes, not in the movie, but nonetheless proving the basic idea of that potential being given to the character)
You just proved my point! If she can do anything and destroy anyone then why IS she letting him come near? Answer ladies and gentlemen? She can't! She CAN'T do anything and destroy everyone or else she would have. She showed no hesitation in killing the man she loved, the man she CHOSE over Wolverine, and yet Wolverine shows up and "after killing this island full of people, my mentor, and the love of my life, I'm just going to mess with this one guy". Get out of here with that.
Yes she begs him to kill her when she's able to fight it off and be in control. There's no middle about it. She's either in control or she isn't. If she was able to fight it off even as close to the level you say she can we wouldn't have a dead Cyclops and Xavier to ***** about. Wolverine's not special or she would have chose him.
No, you're wrong. Jean and her Phoenix alter-ego formed a bond with Wolverine. Phoenix and Wolverine shared a primal rage and lust. The unrestrained Phoenix tries to seduce Wolverine in the infirmary. Wolverine furiously tells Xavier 'when you cage the beast, the beast gets angry', clearly speaking from experience and a reference to himself as well as to Phoenix. Jean begs to be killed, she mentally contacts Wolverine (after joining Magneto) and calls him to the forest encampment. Clearly there is a bond between them. This is in the movie, and is also backed up by other sources (a Chris Claremont interview years ago described the affinity between Wolverine and Phoenix, both barbaric, primal characters.) Wolverine was an anchor in the mental turmoil in the mind of Jean/Phoenix, through his love/respect for Jean and his more animalistic similarity to Phoenix. Regardless of Cyclops' role in the comics, we are looking at what the movies are depicting.
Wolverine dares to approach Phoenix. His healing power and adamantium enables this to be possible, along with the bond he has with her, even though she could easily turn on him with full focus. When he appeals to her human side ('No, not for them, for you'), the Phoenix personality retreats for a moment, Jean regains some control (we see the eyes change to normal), and he kills her.
Thank you for being condescending by the way. Makes me feel better about being the bigger man in an internet
conversation about
movies and not stooping down to your level.
I feel quite justified in what I said. You reveal an incredibly limited understanding and dreadfully inaccurate interpretation of what was in the movie. May I suggest you rewatch several times with a print-out of my posts at hand. I aim to enlighten. I am increasingly being made aware that many opinions on this movie are born out of misunderstanding. The movie shows us things, without subtitles or a little man popping up at the side of the screen with an explanation; it expects us to use our comprehension skills.