I Am The Knight
Voilá!
- Joined
- May 10, 2005
- Messages
- 24,907
- Reaction score
- 3,613
- Points
- 103
Well Robin's costume doesn't have to be colourful they can darken it and the character yet still stay faithful to the actual character.
Stop making sense.
Well Robin's costume doesn't have to be colourful they can darken it and the character yet still stay faithful to the actual character.
Well Robin's costume doesn't have to be colourful they can darken it and the character yet still stay faithful to the actual character.


Why So Serious?That be the least of problems.
what else the realism? well he doesn't have to be in the frontline straight away like most people they could have robin training from like 12 till 16 until he can handle stuff.
when did he say that lmao
I thought it was common knowledge that Nolan said he wouldn't be using Robin "on his watch" back in 2005. And then Bale supported that decision last year. lmao.
to be honest with Bruce's age it could fit. I mean he is 30 and if Robin is still in a crib then it'll be like ten or twelve years until Robin is old enough to come in so Bruce would be forty and with the training until robin's ready to be on the front line he'd like mid forties... how long can he last? he needs robin by then to take over as well as others.
Hell I'm saying keep him in training in the 3rd film and he ca go on his first mission when he's about 20 in the fourth. You can even do something with Barbara, tries to help Nightwing but is crippled by accident. She returns in the JLA movie as ORACLE
No Batgirl
Deviating a bit. If they ever do a Superman Doomsday movie, instead of Kon-El who is a male teenage clone of Superman, we could retcon him and place Kara (Supergirl) there instead who would be cloned from Lois and Superman... shocker...
Batgirl and Superboy would just be repetitions
Also, Nolan said that Robin was in a crib somewhere... Bale was being Bale...
And I doubt a director would refuse to use a character just because THEY feel he/she is ... icky icky poo poo
No robin or catwoman! Don't ruin the trilogy!
What surprises me is that if you guys can't accept Robin... how the hell can you accept guys like Superman, Wonder Woman, Green Lantern and pretty much the rest of the DC Universe?. If something as simple as Robin can't work how can everything else?
Same problem at Marvel. Fravreau's scratching his head on how to make the eventual meeting between realism based Iron Man and demi-god Thor
.The problem is not Robin, but Robin next to Batman. Batman becoming a father and having a colorful side-kick kid. It ruins the best of Batman.
Hence why I came up with the idea I did. I figured that if a younger character would come into Bruce's life as a partner, it'd have to be Jason, who would in turn die, and show Bruce the reason why he, in the future, will try even harder not to endanger others.
Especially kids.
Honestly, I don't really care for Spider-Bite's idea. Not retaliation- it just doesn't seem to flow with Nolan's universe. I like the character of Robin, honestly, especially Dick Grayson- I just don't see the Robin we know in the comics being brought directly into these movies, if at all. Not tooting my own horn, but I think my idea could wind itself into the Nolan series quite nicely. Granted, I'm not a director, nor am I working with Nolan, so I seriously doubt it'll ever be realized.
No way. I wanna see Batgirl done right even moreso than I want to see Robin.
No robin or catwoman! Don't ruin the trilogy!
How does Bruce being a father and having a side kick make it lighter? It doesn't have to be all green tights and yellow underwear or whatever.
How does Bruce being a father and having a side kick make it lighter? It doesn't have to be all green tights and yellow underwear or whatever.
No robin or catwoman! Don't ruin the trilogy!
