Saint said:I'm not going to bother arguing with someone who chooses to ignore the past twenty years of Robin stories, and who wants to cut out an integral part of the Batman mythos. You obviously don't care about the truth of the matter--if you did, you would pick up any modern Batman comic and see how Robin can be done well by talented writers who understand the character and his importance to Batman. No, you'd rather be ignorant and bleat "OMG TEH ROBIN IS TEH CAMPY!" as if "Batman & Robin" is the definitive version of Dick Grayson.
Furthermore, you must think the Nolans to be pretty incompetent writers, if you think they can't concoct a workable version of Robin, as lowly comic book writers have been doing for years.
Actually, what I'm insulting you for is suggesting that Robin "ruins" Batman.El Payaso said:Ok, I guess I shouldn't argue with people that ignores that Nolan and Bale are the ones not wanting to work with Robin and still insults people in here like we're guilty for that.
Majik1387 said:Well why don't we just get rid of Alfred and Gordon while we're at it? Batman doesn't really need to get Gordon to give him case files, he can just sneak into the station and get them himself. And Alfred? Batman really has no need for him. Bruce can answer doors, get himself food, etc.
![]()
Saint said:Yeah, I wonder if maybe Batman's adopted sonmight be important to Batman? I wonder if the entire surrogate family theme that has been consistent in Batman for over sixty years might be important?
You know, I have to wonder if the people saying things like this even read comics. I can't fathom somebody picking up a Batman or Robin comic today and then saying such stupid, baseless things. Robin is the most important supporting character Batman has, period.
Fisher02 said:Robin is okay in the comics, but add him into the movies, and you could mess up the whole franchine. Although Robin wasn't the reason bat-movies went downhill after Batman Returns.
It could have worked better, if it wasnt for the fact Batman Forever/ Batman & Robin were aimed for the customers, who want Happy Meal with toys.
If I were to introduce Robin into the franchine, I would skip the Robin part of his side-kickhood, and have a go with his Nightwing persona.
Saint said:I'm not frustrated at all. I'm just rude. Learn to deal.
El Payaso said:Easy pal. One would say that capitalizing every word and being a Robin fan would make you a happy boy.![]()
Agreed. As I have said in that past, I won't be terribly inconvenienced--annoyed, maybe--if he doesn't appear in Nolan's film. I just really hate this attitude that he's a "horrible character" or "can't be done."raybia said:Does this means that Nolan is obligated to bring Dick Grayson or Robin into his series?
No.
Saint said:Agreed. As I have said in that past, I won't be terribly inconvenienced--annoyed, maybe--if he doesn't appear in Nolan's film. I just really hate this attitude that he's a "horrible character" or "can't be done."
raybia said:I hear you.
Previous stories have proven that Robin can be a horrible character depending on how he is written but the same can be said about Batman.
Mike_D202 said:I dont know why everybody is bashing the idea of Dick Grayson. Nolan could do a damn good job with the story if he wanted too. Bruce could see him as himself when he was a kid and try to work with Grayson to turn the anger and sadness into something else.
El Payaso said:But even the Adam West Batman was better than the Burt Ward Robin even when they were - IMO - very poorly written/directed.
You clearly do not understand the dynamic between Batman and Robin.El Payaso said:And I surely wouldn't like to see Batman forgetting his inner demon and turning into a loving father and a new sweet sense of life and stuff that Batman is not supposed to be.
Saint said:You clearly do not understand the dynamic between Batman and Robin.