The Dark Knight Rises Nolan...add Robin!!!!!!

Do you want to see Robin appear in a future BB movie?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't care/ Who's Robin?

  • Yes

  • No

  • Don't care/ Who's Robin?


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Something I've thought about; what would he wear, in keeping with Nolan's world? I remember back when Batman '89 first came out & people were speculating on Robin even then. (Michael J. Fox was the name that a lot of people kicked around.) I kept picturing him in an all-black armor, very similar to Batman's, because I couldn't picture him in the red, yellow & green. Now I find myself thinking those same thoughts again.
 
to be honest If they do robin I want the old Dick Grayson suit. Have a red vest of armour with green sleeves but yellow pants.

2bh in grant morrison's batman and robin some knight guy (don't know his name) referred to Dick as Robin as "a demonic pixie" i kind of liked that idea and fought well maybe Dick can be scary like if he stays in the shadows like Batman in BB and appears out of nowhere, While Batman takes on the bad guys in the open and the shadows.
 
You hit the nail on the head with the different media aspect and likewise BB, TDK are not fantasy genre films. That''s not there medium. There style is probably most similar to not the batman comics that emerged in the 50's with sci-fi and all that. But more so to both year one's of batman.

The actual first "year one" of batman in comics 39-40 where he pretty much exclusivly took on mobsters and such and frank miller's Year one. Not to mention also the mobster heavy TLH.

Stylistically this film doesn't fit the world you described in your post. It shouldn't have to either. Batman has 70 years of history and no film maker should feel forced to cram all of that into a 2hr+ film.
Batman simultaneously appears in at least three comic books every month: Detective Comics, Batman and Justice League. He is the same person in all of them but Detective focuses on his street level adventures against mobsters, Batman focuses on more superheroic stuff like stories with Joker, Ras, etc, and JL... well you know. But he's the same hero, just in different situations. So Nolan could easily have told his Detective Comics story, while some other director, or Nolan himself could use him in a JL story.
Should Nolan add Robin? Yes. In the next movie? No. I think we should give put a hold on Robin till 4 or 5 if that ever occurs to be the saga case. However, I think it would be interesting to start off with Jason Todd first instead of Dick Grayson. Benefit of the doubt thought of Joker returning to take away of Bats' new collegues and having the Robin/Nightwing story come into place after that; working to a more dramatic effect.
I think they should follow canon. Grayson is the most iconic one, and the one who plays best against Batman because he's so different from him. Why tamper with the canon? To adapt the brat that nobody liked?
 
Last edited:
I like Robin, I think he's a good character, not just what he is, he brings fun to a dark world but is also driven like Batman, but I like that with Batman he brings out a new dynamic i.e. Batman doesn't wnat another Batman or rather, he knows that he'll never have a happy ending he'll always be Batman which is why he always wants his sidekicks to be their own man, even if he does manipulate them at times he's doing it to strengthen them and have them grow.

I've always seen Batman was kind of like Doctor Who, at firsy he doesn't like the idea of a sidekick i.e. the first Doctor but also he's kind of a lonely creature no matter how much he is a loner. That's something that has been shown with Batman I mean when Dick left he missed him a lot, and with each Robin he niether likes the position he puts them in but respects their decision and also selfishly wants them there with him. If they did that it would be a good storyline.
 
Batman simultaneously appears in at least three comic books every month: Detective Comics, Batman and Justice League. He is the same person in all of them but Detective focuses on his street level adventures against mobsters, Batman focuses on more superheroic stuff like stories with Joker, Ras, etc, and JL... well you know. But he's the same hero, just in different situations. So Nolan could easily have told his Detective Comics story, while some other director, or Nolan himself could use him in a JL story. I think they should follow canon. Grayson is the most iconic one, and the one who plays best against Batman because he's so different from him. Why tamper with the canon? To adapt the brat that nobody liked?

You know i don't disagree with you, but this thread is called "Nolan..add Robin" So yea some other director in the future with a different style might attempt to fit robin in appropriately but for sure not in this current series. And I don't see nolan changing style to end off his tillogy.
 
okay I have to agree with the idea, that with Nolan he doesn't fit, I can't really think of a way in which to bring him in within Nolan's universe but I'm not disputing that Robin isn't useable in a Batman film like many others do.
 
to be honest If they do robin I want the old Dick Grayson suit. Have a red vest of armour with green sleeves but yellow pants.

That's not the Grayson suit. And I don't see it. I really don't think they would put him in anything similar to what O'Donnell wore.
 
The whole concept of Batman is ridiculous. He is a man dressed as a bat that fight crime in a world with evil space gods, alien vampires, people with magic rings, and witches. And in this crazy world, kid sidekicks are normal. Batman, Superman, Wonder Woman, Green Arrow, Flash and others have had at least one.

Isnt LotR ridiculous in that instead of gettting an army, or hell the best warrior around to get the ring to Mordor they gave it to a little hobbit who for some reason was the only person that the ring couldnt temp too much? Doesnt make sense, does it?

Or how about that Flash guy? He supposedly can run faster than the speed of light but he doesnt burn out from the friction because of some "speed force" bullcrap. UNREALISTIC!

EVERYTHING must make sense in the real world, or else it cant work. Comics, books and cinema are different media and yet you can adapt a book word for word, but you cant adapt a comic book that way? Anyway, i'm done defending Robin against guys who only know the mythos from the movies and BTAS. I'll wait for the moment that Nolan or some other director adapts Robin successfully and you'll all be like: "I told you Robin would work!"

I think Robin is awesome but I kinda don't want Nolan to use him because he doesn't seem to like the character. I'd rather see Robin leading the Titans in a movie and treated like the bad ass that he is.
 
That's not the Grayson suit. And I don't see it. I really don't think they would put him in anything similar to what O'Donnell wore.

O'Donnell's costume was like Tim Drakes. and I was more going for this:

grayson31.jpg


Except make the boots longer, make the yellow and red a darker colour and with the pantlessness change them to yellow pants so it gives the look of the old suit.
 
Christopher and I qoute
"Robin is still a Baby in a crib somewhere".

Christian and I qoute
"WHAT DONT YOU ******* UNDERSTAND? IM GOING TO CHAIN MYSELF TO THE ******* WALL IF THAT MUTHA******* ROBIN SHOWS UP....Me and you,were done professionally".
 
Christopher and I qoute
"Robin is still a Baby in a crib somewhere".

Christian and I qoute
"WHAT DONT YOU ******* UNDERSTAND? IM GOING TO CHAIN MYSELF TO THE ******* WALL IF THAT MUTHA******* ROBIN SHOWS UP....Me and you,were done professionally".
I love your Bale jokes! :woot:
O'Donnell's costume was like Tim Drakes. and I was more going for this:

grayson31.jpg


Except make the boots longer, make the yellow and red a darker colour and with the pantlessness change them to yellow pants so it gives the look of the old suit.
I dont think that we'll ever see a pantless Robin. Its too weird. His circus uniform could be pantless, but when he transforms it into his Robin suit, it should definitely have pants.
 
2bh, I'm guessing the first movie will see him as Robin at the end and I think the circus outfit should be first thing he wears to fight crime, I mean if they made out it was a failing circus that no one went to it would make sense that no one would put two and two together about robin's costume but he'd change to a more Tim Drake look. But 2bh I never said a pantless i meant for him to have yellow pants to give the look of that.
 
Robin (and/or Nightwing) will certainly be in the upcoming Teen Titans film, I think that's the best place for him.
 
It would be cool if for the next film the end scene leads to Robin, like the joker in BB.
 
It doesn't even seem like Nolan's Batman/Bruce would want some teenage sidekick following him around.
 
he doesn't want inexperienced people with guns running around but he is open to inspiring people to fight back.
 
Not teenage boys. Then fans will want another sequel with the introduction of Batgirl. Nolan already mentioned in an interview that Dick Grayson is in a crib somewhere during the time of Batman Begins, and The Dark Knight takes place one year later so Dick is probably two-years old.
 
Have you read this thread at all? People have backed up their reasons for Robin with more than "because it happened in the comics."

What I liked was the witty retort, not the sentiment espressed in the post.

I'll be happy if Robin is in the movie; I'll be happy if he isn't. Either works for me.

I haven't read most of the thread because I've read the same comments a million times....

- Nolan doesn't like Dick
- Bruce needs Dick
- We haven't seen any big screen Dick since 1997

etc
 
Last edited:
What I liked was the witty retort, not the sentiment espressed in the post.

I'll be happy if Robin is in the movie; I'll be happy if he isn't. Either works for me.

I haven't read most of the thread because I've read the same comments a million times....

- Nolan doesn't like Dick
- Bruce needs Dick
- We haven't seen any big screen Dick since 1997

etc

I see what you did there....and I like it !!! :awesome:


Polux
 
You know what's really annoying, most of the Pro- Robin people here try and give intelligent back up statements for their point of view for why Robin should be included in the next Batman film. And the anti-Robin people can only say "No NOLAN DOESN'T LIKE HIM!! I LOVE NOLAN, NOLAN IS GOD!!!".

Despite the critical analysis and 70 years worth of comic books that have featured the character of Robin- some of the posters here think that they know the character of Batman more than experienced writers like Dennis O'Neal, Jeph Loeb (pre-Ultimates), Alan Grant, Alan Moore, Neil Gaiman and Grant Morrison whose works on Batman feature Robin heavily and have all managed to understand the reason why Batman needs Robin. He is the light to Batman's dark.

Robin in many ways makes Batman different to most superheroes in a way, Batman can be dark, yes, and most of the time he should be. But he shouldn't be depressing. Honestly, The Dark Knight showed us that superhero movies can be taken seriously and not just high action fun; but they can show us themes and be great story-telling and works of art. As for the realism that Nolan implants in his movies? Yes, he's done it better than most people...but still IT'S A STORY OF A GUY DRESSED AS A BAT!!! The entire realistic approach of Batman is ridiculous in it's concept, but that's what makes it great; Morrison's recent run on Batman has showed us that he is the ultimate human being who strived to perfection to combat evil, no matter it's forms. Yes, Batman is dark, but his entire character is built to inspire and show us that human will can overcome anything. He's not a dark brooding loner, if people just copy The Dark Knight's "darkness" then we'll have comic book films that represent this:

youngblood.jpg


Why am I showing you a Rob Liefeld comic? Well it wasn't that long after Watchmen that we got the anti-hero craze that swept through comics and try to make super-heroes more "dark" and "edgy" with no context. I'm not saying that this is what will happen if we don't include Robin in any future Bat-films, but to me this seems like the mindset some posters here think of the character of Batman.

Going to my earlier point, the character of Dick Grayson (notice how I say Dick Grayson, not Robin) only compliments this. Dick had a tragedy much similar to Bruce Wayne did where he lost his parents at a young age, Bruce then took the young boy in and soon trained him. Now in the comics, Dick has managed to become a more normal human being and a happier one thanks to his adoptive father, Bruce Wayne. Now, about my idea for how to adapt Robin to the next film and change him? Simple. Just change the costume, keep every other part of the character roughly the same and have him trained by Bruce. It's a perfect dynamic right there. Any attempts to change Robin to become "cooler" would then just have him become Jason Todd (who was killed for being annoying and too dark) and eventually we had Tim Drake. Now, you may argue that Damian is a popular Robin, but that's only because of the role reversal between a light Batman and a dark Robin.

Thematically, the inclusion of Robin makes sense seeing as Bruce dealt heavily with the loss of his father in the first film, it only makes sense that he manages to save someone from the same torment he had by giving him a release by fighting criminals the same way. Make the costume darker in tone and resemble Batman's, it's simple. Hell, just have Dick as a supporting character who doesn't become Robin till the end of the film, simple.

And you know what? Most audiences would love it; if any director could make people show why Robin works and he's a great character it's Christopher Nolan. Personally to me, you can kill off the Joker and still tell Batman stories without him for twenty years, and it'll still feel like Batman to me. But kill off Robin, and erase Dick Grayson, Jason Todd, Tim Drake from DC Continuity? Then you just have a lonely depressed Bruce Wayne with no legacy who will always be closer to insanity and become slightly better than any other Wolverine or Punisher knock-off.

Anyway, I would really hope people would stop calling the concept of Robin stupid as he is just as important as Batman towards the mythology (hell, look at the current Batman comics- Dick Grayson is in the costume!), but as usal the best response I will get is "ROBIN SUCKS!! I HATE HIM, HE'S A KID!! KIDS ARE STUPID! SINCE WHEN IS BATMAN FOR KIDS!!!?"
 
You know what's really annoying, most of the Pro- Robin people here try and give intelligent back up statements for their point of view for why Robin should be included in the next Batman film. And the anti-Robin people can only say "No NOLAN DOESN'T LIKE HIM!! I LOVE NOLAN, NOLAN IS GOD!!!".

Despite the critical analysis and 70 years worth of comic books that have featured the character of Robin- some of the posters here think that they know the character of Batman more than experienced writers like Dennis O'Neal, Jeph Loeb (pre-Ultimates), Alan Grant, Alan Moore, Neil Gaiman and Grant Morrison whose works on Batman feature Robin heavily and have all managed to understand the reason why Batman needs Robin. He is the light to Batman's dark.

Robin in many ways makes Batman different to most superheroes in a way, Batman can be dark, yes, and most of the time he should be. But he shouldn't be depressing. Honestly, The Dark Knight showed us that superhero movies can be taken seriously and not just high action fun; but they can show us themes and be great story-telling and works of art. As for the realism that Nolan implants in his movies? Yes, he's done it better than most people...but still IT'S A STORY OF A GUY DRESSED AS A BAT!!! The entire realistic approach of Batman is ridiculous in it's concept, but that's what makes it great; Morrison's recent run on Batman has showed us that he is the ultimate human being who strived to perfection to combat evil, no matter it's forms. Yes, Batman is dark, but his entire character is built to inspire and show us that human will can overcome anything. He's not a dark brooding loner, if people just copy The Dark Knight's "darkness" then we'll have comic book films that represent this:

youngblood.jpg


Why am I showing you a Rob Liefeld comic? Well it wasn't that long after Watchmen that we got the anti-hero craze that swept through comics and try to make super-heroes more "dark" and "edgy" with no context. I'm not saying that this is what will happen if we don't include Robin in any future Bat-films, but to me this seems like the mindset some posters here think of the character of Batman.

Going to my earlier point, the character of Dick Grayson (notice how I say Dick Grayson, not Robin) only compliments this. Dick had a tragedy much similar to Bruce Wayne did where he lost his parents at a young age, Bruce then took the young boy in and soon trained him. Now in the comics, Dick has managed to become a more normal human being and a happier one thanks to his adoptive father, Bruce Wayne. Now, about my idea for how to adapt Robin to the next film and change him? Simple. Just change the costume, keep every other part of the character roughly the same and have him trained by Bruce. It's a perfect dynamic right there. Any attempts to change Robin to become "cooler" would then just have him become Jason Todd (who was killed for being annoying and too dark) and eventually we had Tim Drake. Now, you may argue that Damian is a popular Robin, but that's only because of the role reversal between a light Batman and a dark Robin.

Thematically, the inclusion of Robin makes sense seeing as Bruce dealt heavily with the loss of his father in the first film, it only makes sense that he manages to save someone from the same torment he had by giving him a release by fighting criminals the same way. Make the costume darker in tone and resemble Batman's, it's simple. Hell, just have Dick as a supporting character who doesn't become Robin till the end of the film, simple.

And you know what? Most audiences would love it; if any director could make people show why Robin works and he's a great character it's Christopher Nolan. Personally to me, you can kill off the Joker and still tell Batman stories without him for twenty years, and it'll still feel like Batman to me. But kill off Robin, and erase Dick Grayson, Jason Todd, Tim Drake from DC Continuity? Then you just have a lonely depressed Bruce Wayne with no legacy who will always be closer to insanity and become slightly better than any other Wolverine or Punisher knock-off.

Anyway, I would really hope people would stop calling the concept of Robin stupid as he is just as important as Batman towards the mythology (hell, look at the current Batman comics- Dick Grayson is in the costume!), but as usal the best response I will get is "ROBIN SUCKS!! I HATE HIM, HE'S A KID!! KIDS ARE STUPID! SINCE WHEN IS BATMAN FOR KIDS!!!?"
:applaud GREAT POST!!! You sir are awesome!

Most people barely know of Robin, or have only seen him in the Schumacher movies. They dont need to make him grimdark (like you said, we'll end up with Jason Todd), they dont need to change his story (the stupidest idea ever: Have Nightwing as an unrelated to Batman Gotham superhero), etc. If they simply stick to Dick's story, if they examine the issues that come up with Bruce adopting a kid, fighting with a partner, having to take care of him, etc, the people will love him.

Robin is more than a flashy costume and "holy ___ Batman" jokes.
 
Last edited:
This thread is something we've seen a ton of on the HYPE since BB came out. I am a huge Robin fan (look at my name!) and I agree that he a legitimately deep and interesting character, be he Dick, Jason, Tim, or Damian (I try not to count Stephanie). Having said that, I do not think Robin has a place in the Nolan movies. He is much lighter and frankly, happier. Not to mention that Nolan has put his fist down on the "No Robin Policy."

I do enjoy seeing people defend the Boy Wonder though!
 
I REALLY cant understand all the hate Robin has,seriously I cant.

He brings a certain light to all the grim and depressing elements that plague Batman comics,which most of the time is unnecessary. Sure Batman is dark,but it was created a certain way all those years ago with Robin and most people disrespect that.

People hate the 60's show cause it was camp. Why hate it? It was true to itself,and I feel that shouldn't be disrespected as well. Im a Batman fan on all accounts. Camp,serious,its all good to me.

I think some people should loosen up and go back a few years,become a true Batfan,if tried and still not,THEN you carry on bashing it. Same goes for Robin. He isnt just a brat in a bright costume,he is an important character and if you dont believe me,go back and look at the stories. Im sorry,but some people should have more respect.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,434
Messages
22,105,138
Members
45,898
Latest member
NeonWaves64
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"