Superman Returns Note to Singer -- Use Braniac!

db85usa

HeHe!
Joined
Sep 26, 2002
Messages
2,132
Reaction score
1
Points
58
We all know we don't want to see Zod and Luthor as the only villains in a sequel to SR... I would much rather prefer a NEW face at Villain with Luthor and Zod as secondary Villains... you know, the two of them onto different things and ways to destroy Superman but I want Superman's main concern to be BRANIAC.

Maybe the problem including the other Superman villains is because they cant find the right person to play the role of Braniac or Darkseid or Metallo.

If Singer reads these boards he must sign Hugo Weaving to play Braniac, he would be the perfect choice. Classic voice, can act with a mask, he's proven that. And he's proven he can be a hated villain i.e. The Matrix Trilogy.

I would love to see Routh face Weaving it would be great!

BrandonRouthPicture.jpg

vendetta_portrait1.jpg



1128517228.jpg

notmilk.jpg
 
Donner's run on Action Comics is going to have Brainiac right? So, we could probably expect to see something like that.
 
Superman Returns II, Reload the Matrix Again for Another Bad Sequel!

Ummm, I like Weaving, but no.
 
I support the idea for brainiac, but not that guy... I just can't see him as Brainaic.
 
Singer is gone. Perhaps the reboot will have either A. a good Luthor or b. a good brainiac.
 
Singer is gone? Really? When did the official news come on that- I must have missed that. Tell me, where is that stated? ..... exactly. More like you WANT Singer gone and there is no official news one way or the other.


Personally always saw Edward Norton as Brainiac- but, might be one of the only ones that sees it.
 
no singer is not gone, nor is he signed up.
 
Kabuki_Jo said:
Singer gone...a dream come true...

Check above. No official word one way or another- so nope, your dream (not mine) has not come true yet. Will it? Might, might not. Word is leaning on the edge right now- between Singer and new guy. No official word has been given. So, YOUR dream is not true yet.
 
while I still think Singer is getting a bad rap, he's still very talented. People just like to see someone sucessful fail. Hell, I've done it back in high school..when the nerdiest kid in class gets a B and I would get an A, it's a great feeling. It's human nature.

Anyway, I believe that Singer should come back ONLY if DC is there to advise him, and IF he's open to it.
 
note to Singer- great film dude! Jus next time round have a more action and supervillan
 
note to singer... you're directing ability as far as superman goes doesn't exist. When WB dumps your stupid ass after the DVD comes out don't cry, you brought it upon yourself.

For those of you who can't read between the lines and who hold out hope he'll come back to do ****man II: the wrath of montezuma, denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
 
WTFwuzThT said:
denial isn't just a river in Egypt.

That works for the haters/naysayers as well. Both sides are bias and both (by the opposing side) could be stated to be in "denial". It still strikes me as hilarious when haters/naysayers on here try to come off sounding like they're not bias- imo, only makes them sound more so.

I just find it funny and pitiful when someone who is obviously bias tries to come off as not being bias.
 
I was wondering that, Tempest ( Saph? )...j/k, dude.

We shall get ready for Superman 2 - Zod returns

Why are you saying the "haters" are biased?
SR is a piece of rotten crap, just a really, really bad movie.
I can almost picture Kevin Smith saying: " Where's the ****ing spider?"
 
Kabuki_Jo said:
Why are you saying the "haters" are biased?
SR is a piece of rotten crap, just a really, really bad movie.

In your opinion, not in everybody's. Thinking that it is everybody's is being bias.

Extreme pro are bias, just as the extreme anti are bias. Everyone is open to have their own opinions, but there are extreme cases on both sides that do absolutely show extreme bias.

As said- BOTH sides are bias. There are pro that take everything said and think everything positive. While there are anti who- take EVERYTHING positive as a spin, everything negative as the truth, and view positive reviews or word as WB bribery. Both sides even often claim to speak 'the truth'. To me, that's just funny. And as I said- BOTH sides are bias.

Please note that I am not saying that all SR pro and all anti SR are bias. But, there are alot that are- I was generalizing, and you have probably run into your share of bias posters as well.
 
Well if SR happened after Superman 2 then Zod is no more. Use Brainiac and Metello.
 
Note to Singer -- No one wants Zod. Do yourself a favor and open a comic book, you might like it.
 
Immortalfire said:
Note to Singer -- No one wants Zod. Do yourself a favor and open a comic book, you might like it.
I love how all you bashers/haters think you speak for everyone..check the boards...their are some who do want Zod in the Sequel..me I prefer Brainiac myself.
 
yeah I figure another rehash of an old movie would be pretty cool. why not...
 
Use Darkseid DAMMIT!!! SO if singer uses Zod in SR2 that means if there is ever a SR3 he will make superman turn evil???
 
superman 2 returns: the wrath of zod!

thats what singer wants......
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"