Pregnant Man

I'm sure sane people in the GLBT are distraught about the negative effects this is sure to have on people's perceptions.

Indeed. Although, is the risk to the baby due to the hormones widely published? Besides reading your post, I must have missed that. You would think the person would look into possible complications before attempting pregancy, though :huh:
 
Indeed. Although, is the risk to the baby due to the hormones widely published? Besides reading your post, I must have missed that. You would think the person would look into possible complications before attempting pregancy, though :huh:

I don't think it's that widely published, in fact I heard it on the radio so It could have just been commentary.
and I agree with you.
I do hope this woman put her babie's health first.
 
Indeed. Although, is the risk to the baby due to the hormones widely published? Besides reading your post, I must have missed that. You would think the person would look into possible complications before attempting pregancy, though :huh:
I argued with Spideyboy 1111 forever over this. You would think someone would take deep thought into considering complications or the health of the baby over your own wants. Is adoption un-cool now? Do we need shock value like this?

Lastly, besides irony, what is the point in spending all that money and time to become a man only to revert back to a woman? This person is the reverse of Mrs. Garrison.
 
I saw this story the other day. & the picture. I was like Wtf?! Is that real?:o


No! This is not real!

THIS IS A WOMAN HAVING A BABY! :cmad: Women have baby's all the time!

The shameful part is how the media keeps flashing "MAN IS PREGNANT!"
When I first heard that crap, I knew it couldn't be true. I found that I was right.

This is a woman who cut off her breasts, attached a penis, shot male hormones but did not remove her baby factory!!!

Have we lost our minds?? Are we so far gone that we don't know left from right....up from down??? Now "NATURE" has stepped in to show us what this person's gender is (pregnancy) and the media is calling this a "MAN"??? Why?? Because she wants to be called that???

Well as we see, wanting it, does not make it so.

This so ridiculous and vile.
 
I argued with Spideyboy 1111 forever over this. You would think someone would take deep thought into considering complications or the health of the baby over your own wants. Is adoption un-cool now? Do we need shock value like this?

Lastly, besides irony, what is the point in spending all that money and time to become a man only to revert back to a woman? This person is the reverse of Mrs. Garrison.

did you watch the opera thing? if you did... you would know the baby has been perfectly safe the whole time. and the hormones are at a normal female level. The baby is perfectly healthy and if any risk, it was at the very beginning. Which they were very safe about. :o
 
Indeed. Although, is the risk to the baby due to the hormones widely published? Besides reading your post, I must have missed that. You would think the person would look into possible complications before attempting pregancy, though :huh:

see my previous post
 
the thing I found problematic is that, and I'm not really sure where I heard this, they said that it was possible that her baby would nave problems later in life because of the amount of hormones this guy/girl (guyrl?) took.
I mean, want to be a dude? awesome, go for it but please don't hurt others in the process.

am i the only one who actually watched this on opera? the guys hormone levels are normal right now, and the baby is perfectly healthy his testosterone level is at that of a normal females, and the doctor said the baby is perfectly fine, hell the reason it failed before was because of a normal birth problem, the babies were a multiple birth and stuck in the fallopian tubes. FOR THE LAST TIME, THERE IS NO HORMONE RISK AND THE LITTLE GIRL IS VERY HEALTHY
 
If he started out as a woman, there's nothing strange about it. It's still a woman in my book, I don't care what it adds to itself.
 
If he started out as a woman, there's nothing strange about it. It's still a woman in my book, I don't care what it adds to itself.

Dude, she had a strapadicktome . . . and now she's a dude :)
 
This story made me laugh, physically she is not a man. Her choice not to have the full operation seems to indicate a desire to have her cake and eat it. As does "wanting" to be a man but have coital intercouse with a genetic male. Sexuality is complicated, we have some truly ambiguous examples, the female swimming champion who was raised a girl had female genitalia and yet when she had a genetic assay was XY. It is commonly accepted Testosterone levels are a key indicator of sexuality. I am suprised, given the doses this woman was taking, she could concieve at all. Interstingly, most male embryos get a second shot of Testosterone in the womb. This has been linked to being good at sport. The affects of her bodies high level of testosterone make me doubt the baby will ever be born.
 
If the tail fits . . .

That's just silly.
No...you'd be a human being with a dog tail artificially attached....that's all.

This is a WOMAN...a woman who altered herself on the outside. But her body is saying....:nono:
 
did you watch the opera thing? if you did... you would know the baby has been perfectly safe the whole time. and the hormones are at a normal female level. The baby is perfectly healthy and if any risk, it was at the very beginning. Which they were very safe about. :o

That is indeed what the doctor is claiming, as also reported on MSNBC:

His obstetrician, Dr. Kimberly James, who practices in the Oregon town, told Winfrey, “This is a normal pregnancy.”

She said Beatie stopped taking testosterone two years ago and his levels of the hormone are normal.

“This baby is totally healthy,” she said. “This is what I consider a normal pregnancy.”

OK,...but my question is this: If Thomas stopped taking testosterone so long ago, then where is all this facial hair still coming from?
pregtranscg4.jpg


Can a transgendered F to M keep growing man-like amounts of facial hair without a constant hormone treatment?
 
That's just silly.
No...you'd be a human being with a dog tail artificially attached....that's all.

This is a WOMAN...a woman who altered herself on the outside. But her body is saying....:nono:

I have a book recommendation for you that I think you'd find very interesting..."Queer Theory, Gender Theory" by Riki Wilchins. Look into it, it's a very philosophical read.
 
That is indeed what the doctor is claiming, as also reported on MSNBC:



OK,...but my question is this: If Thomas stopped taking testosterone so long ago, then where is all this facial hair still coming from?
pregtranscg4.jpg


Can a transgendered F to M keep growing man-like amounts of facial hair without a constant hormone treatment?

George Michael's had facial hair for years :rolleyes:
 
I have a book recommendation for you that I think you'd find very interesting..."Queer Theory, Gender Theory" by Riki Wilchins. Look into it, it's a very philosophical read.


just picturing him asking the guy at his local "Borders" for this, has me in stitches.

Celldog: "...it's not for me, it's because of...the pregnant man"

Borders Guy
: :dry:
 
Trip.

No "Pregnant man" here.

We have a Lesbian in a relationship who surgically tweaked herself then got pregnant.

I kinda wish they got no attention at all.

Understand that I have issue with you first determining what sex you are BY CHOICE Then expecting kudo's for doing what your body is designed to do ANYWAY.

There is really nothing "special" about this except the woman insist on being called a man.

Tsk.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"