The Question
Objectivism doesn't work.
- Joined
- Apr 17, 2005
- Messages
- 40,541
- Reaction score
- 30
- Points
- 58
I already addressed that. It's not that there can't be no theme of legacy whatsoever; it's that it wouldn't have the exact same amount of impact. The whole "playboy act is ruining family's image but I have to in order to secretly fulfill their legacy as Batman by continuing to help the city" angle just wouldn't have the same impact under 3 generations as, for example, Solomon and Alan Wayne working with Gotham's architects on the city and their history with the Civil War. I'm sorry but it just wouldn't be the same.
Now, whether or not you like that angle is an entirely different topic but just because someone doesn't like something about a character does not mean it isn't important to the character. So many people hate that Batman doesn't kill the Joker and doesn't use guns. That doesn't mean his no-kill/gun rule isn't a huge part of his character. Me personally, I never cared too much for the whole paranoia angle that so many writers beef up, but many writers have beefed it up nonetheless.
But I see no evidence that it is important to the character. It's a relatively new addition to the mythos that's been the story-focus probably less than half a dozen times, rarely ever comes into play in any of Batman's adventures, doesn't have a whole lot of bearing on the core thematic elements that make Batman Batman, and have some very very discomforting connotations of elitist and anti-democratic thinking. It's a neat little bit of world building, but that's about it. And it's world building that doesn't even have to be lost in any significant way, you can still have stuff like the Judge Solomon Wayne Courthouse regardless of Bruce's ethnicity, a northern city naming it's main courthouse after one of it's first black judges from the late 1800s isn't an unheard of thing. The Wayne family can still have long standing roots in the history of Gotham City, it's just that instead of being rich white Europeans who came in and basically built the place, they came in with the rest of the poor working class masses who actually did the building, became pillars of the community through their actions and good works instead of their inherited wealth, and eventually amassed a fortune and rose to prominence as one of the city's richest and most powerful families through hard work and dedication to the people of Gotham.
You don't even have to lose the "playboy ruining the family image" schtick (even though I don't see it as the highest of priorities), because you can have the family image be based on the actions and the service of past Wayne family members instead of their bank accounts. Instead of a family history of shipping magnates and robber barons, you can give the Wayne family a legacy of activism and community organizing, or fighting for American Independence and the end of slavery and for civil rights for all Americans as the guys on the front lines and in the city streets and in the musty old taverns lighting a fire under the people of Gotham.
Instead of Judge Solomon Wayne being a rich guy who helped fund the construction of the city's skyline, make him the first person of color to hold such a public office in the city of Gotham, someone who from that seat fought to fully realize the promise of our constitution for the citizens under his care. Make Alan Wayne a famous journalist who took on organized crime and corrupt Democratic politics in Gotham's City Hall and wrote stories on the lives of the homeless and the mentally ill living in Gotham, bringing new attention to their plight and sorrows.
Honestly, wether they ever change Batman's race in an adaptation or not, that sounds a lot more appealing and a lot more interesting to me than the Waynes as Gotham's royal family.
Last edited: