And I know you're not actually paying attention to a damn thing I'm saying. For the third time, these elements may be established in the films, but they're done in such an unsatisfying manner that people feel they're essentially non existent. And you can talk about Avengers all you want, but no one criticizes Captain America's or Thor's roles like they do Cyclops Thank you for repeating what I just told you as if I didnt understand. In your opinion. Trying reading what I said. I said Star Wars tried to make much of their characters awesome, for lack of a better word. That dosen't imply that I think that Wolverine is the only impressive character in the films. I feel that Jim Caviezel was right when he passed on the role. The only times they felt like doing anything significant character wise is in regards to his relationship with Wolverine and Jean. Again....this is only my opinion on the matter. To you. And I'm sure the Batboards feel the same way about your posts when you go over there to criticize TDKR. Once again...that's your opinion. I feel that film Cyclops is. That's my point. How you feel about that does not matter to me. Then again...that's your assumption. "He dosen't agree with me, so he wasn't paying attention!" Please. YOUR opinion is that she was with Scott "in part" because of his dependability. I believe that that was the ONLY reason she was with Scott. Or, it could be interpreted that way, because their relationship was not done in a satisfying manner.