Script Rundown- Bigtime Spoilers

What do you think of Ed Norton's script rundown?

  • It's gonna rock!

  • It'll suck bad!

  • Not sure yet...


Results are only viewable after voting.
^the truth is that you should all CAN it, and dont judge until you see it! What a ****ing bunch of negative fools!
 
It's crazy how this hulk board seems to be almost split with Ang Lee lovers and haters

I think he made a solid movie that ran a little slow at times and I think most of that is due to the fact that there isn't minimal action for the first 3/4 of it, there is little to no action at all for well over half the movie. I think ang hurt the movie as much as he helped it, but I think movie averages out nicely once the hulk actually shows up in his own movie it is very solid.

Oh and the CGI was a little lame, I am hoping for a better showing this time around
 
This movie sounds like a winner! It's all about how it'll be executed and edited together, cause the story and script they seem to have nailed! Dont judge so negatively before seeing this thing, pal!

Whle I agree with you in the general point you're trying to make, can't he say "Don't judge so positively before seeing this thing, pal", too?
Plus, he just said he didn't like the synopsis, he didn't go into irrelevant bashing, like the actors etc etc (that I've seen of).

PS: Ang Lee is one of the best directors of his generation IMO. Let's not compare apples to oranges. LL is great, too, but usually reaches out to a different crowd than Lee.
 
Look, Mr. CRAP-JACK or what ever the **** you call your self! First of all, Bruce is experimenting on him self with a purpose! A purpose to simply become normal again, it's NOT the same, what the hell are you rambling about!? This story sounds ****ing awesome, especially compared to Ang Lee's piece of crap!!! There's nothing to complain about here, when thinking of how LAME it was with Bruce's dad becoming whatever the **** he did, at the end of the first Hulk movie! It looked and was completely BS! This here sounds tons better! The idea of this guy getting gradualy stronger, doesn't mean supersoldier - as in this guy will fight the HULK as a man! It just means he'll have an edge in battle. They wont let him fight HULK until this guy finaly goes power-horny and goes overboard, becoming the Abomination! He might get in the Hulks way the first time around, but as you can read, Hulk breaks every bone in this guy's body, knocking the **** out of him!

The story seems 100 times better and more solid than Ang Lee's, and a lot more cool! It'll be accepted by all those who HATED the first Hulk movie, simply because this one is a lot more action-packed, and doesn't seem to drag! The script is better, the cast is better, the director is NO DOUBT better! And in contrast with the first Hulk, this movie actually seems to deliever what the first didn't have **** of! INTENSITY! And here's me believing that the effects will be A LOT better too!

This movie sounds like a winner! It's all about how it'll be executed and edited together, cause the story and script they seem to have nailed! Dont judge so negatively before seeing this thing, pal!

:up: and LMAO at the Mr. Crap-Jack comment... :woot:
 
^the truth is that you should all CAN it, and dont judge until you see it! What a ****ing bunch of negative fools!


What?!?
I just don't want him to experimentating it on himself... this made him too close to Emil Blonsky. The Hulk has to be a total curse for Bruce Banner, not something that him intentionally caused, just an unexpected and accidental consequence of his work and his unconditional, heroic nature(he saved Rick Jones, or "Harper" of the first movie, do you remember?).
 
It's crazy how this hulk board seems to be almost split with Ang Lee lovers and haters

I think he made a solid movie that ran a little slow at times and I think most of that is due to the fact that there isn't minimal action for the first 3/4 of it, there is little to no action at all for well over half the movie. I think ang hurt the movie as much as he helped it, but I think movie averages out nicely once the hulk actually shows up in his own movie it is very solid.

Oh and the CGI was a little lame, I am hoping for a better showing this time around

I enjoy Ang's Hulk, and even own the DVD. But that said, it came nowhere close to living up to it's potential, and some of the effects (freeze frame comic explosion) caused gag reflexes. :down:
 
What?!?
I just don't want him to experimentating it on himself... this made him too close to Emil Blonsky. The Hulk has to be a total curse for Bruce Banner, not something that him intentionally caused, just an unexpected and accidental consequence of his work and his unconditional, heroic nature(he saved Rick Jones, or "Harper" of the first movie, do you remember?).

100% agree
 
I enjoy Ang's Hulk, and even own the DVD. But that said, it came nowhere close to living up to it's potential, and some of the effects (freeze frame comic explosion) caused gag reflexes. :down:

I liked that effect, and most of the split screens and swipes. A couple times he went crazy on it but overall it enhanced the film. My favorite was when the camera pulls back to reveal a comic page with animated panels from different scenes and then zooms back in on a different panel to continue the story. That was pure genius and I'd love to see that done again.
 
, he just said he didn't like the synopsis, he didn't go into irrelevant bashing, like the actors etc etc (that I've seen of).

The story is fine. The origin change, once again, is crap! Banner intentionally injecting himself with Super Serum? No he would not do this. So now this is where the Hulk came from? Or is it a combo of this and a lab explosion that caused whatever to do whatever to whatever and whatever else combined with this or that becomes that and then Wah La The Hulk is born? Please tell me this isn't true.
 
I liked that effect, and most of the split screens and swipes. A couple times he went crazy on it but overall it enhanced the film. My favorite was when the camera pulls back to reveal a comic page with animated panels from different scenes and then zooms back in on a different panel to continue the story. That was pure genius and I'd love to see that done again.


We'll have to agree to disagree then. That SUCKED major Ass IMO. It took me out of the movie completely, especially the freeze frame explosion/comic page. :down: *tries not to vomit and remembering*

And the split screens took away from connecting with the moment and the actors.

IF I want a comic book, I will let my self escape in the unbelievable art and story in some of the finer ones out there (nothing like the mind to enhance a scene 10000 times better than a movie can), but I DO NOT WANT a Comic book approach in my Movie.
 
I liked that effect, and most of the split screens and swipes. A couple times he went crazy on it but overall it enhanced the film. My favorite was when the camera pulls back to reveal a comic page with animated panels from different scenes and then zooms back in on a different panel to continue the story. That was pure genius and I'd love to see that done again.


I thought it was cool too, I think possibly the best transitioning in recent movies
 
The story is fine. The origin change, once again, is crap! Banner intentionally injecting himself with Super Serum? No he would not do this. So now this is where the Hulk came from? Or is it a combo of this and a lab explosion that caused whatever to do whatever to whatever and whatever else combined with this or that becomes that and then Wah La The Hulk is born? Please tell me this isn't true.

That's what I said earlier, the synopsis doesn't make it clear, it could be the combination you mentioned, just like in Ang's Hulk.
 
That's what I said earlier, the synopsis doesn't make it clear, it could be the combination you mentioned, just like in Ang's Hulk.

Thanks for the back up BTW.

It does kinda make it clear in as much that Blonsky doesn't become the ABOMINATION until he forces Sterns to inject him with Bruce’s DNA. So from this we can gather that something else happens to Banner, after he injects himself with the soldier serum to cause him to turn into the Hulk. So yeah, it's similar to Angs.
 
It's crazy how this hulk board seems to be almost split with Ang Lee lovers and haters

I think he made a solid movie that ran a little slow at times and I think most of that is due to the fact that there isn't minimal action for the first 3/4 of it, there is little to no action at all for well over half the movie. I think ang hurt the movie as much as he helped it, but I think movie averages out nicely once the hulk actually shows up in his own movie it is very solid.

Oh and the CGI was a little lame, I am hoping for a better showing this time around

I personally didn't like Ang Lee's Hulk, but I won't discredit him. Ang is a very talented director who just misguided.

The first Hulk, to me, is an admirable failure. It's a movie where I got the premise and the intention, but it didn't hit the right chord with me.

However, I didn't think it was necessary for Marvel to 'diss' Ang Lee's Hulk or even have a reboot for that matter. Speaking of bashing, it's not professional on Marvel's part. If they did that, why not reboot 'Daredevil' and bash Mark Steven Johnson then? It's weird.

But Incredible Hulk sounds very interesting. I'll keep an open mind.
 
Thanks for the back up BTW.

Anytime. I can see very well why you wouldn't like this.

It does kinda make it clear in as much that Blonsky doesn't become the ABOMINATION until he forces Sterns to inject him with Bruce’s DNA. So from this we can gather that something else happens to Banner, after he injects himself with the soldier serum to cause him to turn into the Hulk. So yeah, it's similar to Angs.

The part that makes me second-guess is this: "He injected himself with the serum and from that point everything went to hell", which could mean that he took it and hulked out, but could also imply that a sequence of effect took place that lead him to become the Hulk.
I will say it again, though, if Ross was talking about Bruce's father (like in Lee's film), I don't think you have anything to worry about.
 
I personally didn't like Ang Lee's Hulk, but I won't discredit him. Ang is a very talented director who just misguided.

The first Hulk, to me, is an admirable failure. It's a movie where I got the premise and the intention, but it didn't hit the right chord with me.

However, I didn't think it was necessary for Marvel to 'diss' Ang Lee's Hulk or even have a reboot for that matter. Speaking of bashing, it's not professional on Marvel's part. If they did that, why not reboot 'Daredevil' and bash Mark Steven Johnson then? It's weird.

But Incredible Hulk sounds very interesting. I'll keep an open mind.

Yes, yes! 100% agreed.
 
Marvel "should" reboot DD. And should "bash" MSJ... if for nothing more than the DAMN playground fight scene. :down: :cwink:
 
I think this movie sounds great, and exactly what a Hulk movie should be. Yes, the origin is altered, but it ties can tie in to Captain America (and thus the Avengers).

By the way, Banner trying to kill himself: AMAZING.
 
Cracker Jack: No, it wasn't implied. I assumed this, but it's more hope than something solid. It came to mind only because Bruce's father did the exact same thing in Ang's flick. And things DID go to hell after that...
 
F**k the ties with CAP! Is The Incredible Hulk just a secondary character? He has his own *super* elements, gamma rays and stuff like that... don't need any dumb super soldier serum or anything. Man-Thing is created by an iniection of the Super Soldier Serum, but he's another character(portrayed in another crappy movie).
 
Cracker Jack: No, it wasn't implied. I assumpted this, but it's more hope than something solid. It came to mind only because Bruce's father did the exact same thing in Ang's flick. And things DID go to hell after that...

yes, but he was his moody/greedy/nutty father! Not him!
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,269
Messages
22,077,644
Members
45,877
Latest member
dude9876
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"