The next team movie are the Infinity War movies, which will have 5,000 characters. I doubt much focus will be on the main characters' romances at all. It will be like Pepper/Tony and Thor/Jane, forgotten or severely sidelined in the team movies, except Steve/Sharon didn't get the chance to be developed by either of those because they didn't do it in any of the Cap movies. Sharon will probably show up to fight at some point, I imagine, but unless they really decide to make her one of the core characters in another movie, CW was probably the most screentime she'll have going forward. I guess anything's possible though, you never know.
But Sharon is a different love interest to those women because she fights and kicks ass and isn't a damsel in distress. It would be really inconsistent if she doesn't appear in IW. But I haven't seen CW yet so I don't know if Cap dies or not. You can't exactly date a dead person.
it didint fee like Natasha and Bruce imo. It felt like a genuine, very casual relationship. Felt like they've been together since ait the after AOU. They're very comfortable wth each other. The relationship isnt shoved down your throat.
Sharon's screen time is pretty solid. She's not in it for just 5 minutes. Maybe 15-20. I liked her role. She has a purpose in this film. A greater purpose than she did in TWS.
Hoping she shows up to fight in IW too and I want to see Sharon in a proper fight and not a quick 5 sec cut. Also I don't know if she's still working for the government or she goes back to work for SHIELD/Fury. I can understand why she doesn't wear her SHIELD costume because she doesn't work for SHIELD.
Ugh Thanos. I haven't been impressed with what I've seen so far of him.
Yeah TWS and CW Sharon screen time, we all know what happened there, and I've made many suggestions.
But Sharon is a different love interest to those women because she fights and kicks ass and isn't a damsel in distress. It would be really inconsistent if she doesn't appear in IW. But I haven't seen CW yet so I don't know if Cap dies or not. You can't exactly date a dead person.
Everything is finite, right? Nothing can last forever. Its cyclical. Some New Avengers in phase 4 are going to become prominent and then maybe some Avengers might not be around anymore. So, well see how all this plays out but you have to treat every character with respect. I think its interesting that if youve seen four or five movies with the lead character having an arc, I want to see some story telling from some of the secondary characters. Were focusing on that right now with Infinity War while were breaking into those movies, is which characters can we pull to the forefront who potentially havent had their own A story arc to this point. I think youll see that the supporting Avengers are going to become primary Avengers.
You want to get us in a snarl of circular arguments to get a cheap win...
For a guy who doesn't care you seem intent on challenging the idea.
The Russos not liking Sharon is the obvious explanation.
I don't care about trying to spite you or whatever you seem to be implying, is what I was saying.
No, the obvious explanation is that they decided to focus more on characters who they felt were more important to the story or were bigger draws than Sharon. Just like they knew putting Scarjo's name in all the trailers for TWS would sell more tickets than EVC. Which sucks for Sharon, but is something that happens with just about every comic book movie.
Mackie had already been in some major film roles (She Hate Me, Hurt Locker, and Adjustment Bureau, and Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter to name a few) before getting Falcon while EVC was known mainly for her TV roles, making her a bit of an unknown at the film level.Blaming EVC for Sharon's treatment is like getting a dog at the pound and being disappointed that it isn't a cat.
Anthony Mackie wasn't a huge star, nor was Falcon a huge character before TWS, but they put in the work and he proved to be a hit. And now he's relevant and can show up anywhere because they actually expended some effort.
They didn't expend much effort into Sharon, so what does that tell you?
I saw the list of alleged actresses for the role: Rachel McAdams, Elizabeth Olsen, but none of them would sign for 3 minutes of screentime.

Mackie had already been in some major film roles (She Hate Me, Hurt Locker, and Adjustment Bureau, and Abraham Lincoln: Vampire Hunter to name a few) before getting Falcon while EVC was known mainly for her TV roles, making her a bit of an unknown at the film level.
Blaming EVC for Sharon's treatment is like getting a dog at the pound and being disappointed that it isn't a cat.
Oh really?
Emily signed on the role as the female LEAD of the film when she joined the cast and she beat out Emilia Clarke, Felicity Jones, Anna Kendrick, Alison Brie and Mary Elizabeth Winstead, among others.
EVC DID NOT join the film for a 3 min role and they DID NOT cast her for a 3 min role.
http://deadline.com/2013/02/revenges-emily-vancamp-lands-lead-in-captain-america-2-419290/
http://www.slashfilm.com/revenge-st...e-lead-in-captain-america-the-winter-soldier/
I hate how people are trying to blame the actress for the role. She wasn't given much to work with, they did not minimize her role because of EVC fame or acting talent. She is quite popular as well from headlining a major show, Revenge, on ABC for a good number of years.
Blaming EVC for Sharon's treatment is like getting a dog at the pound and being disappointed that it isn't a cat.
Anthony Mackie wasn't a huge star, nor was Falcon a huge character before TWS, but they put in the work and he proved to be a hit. And now he's relevant and can show up anywhere because they actually expended some effort.
They didn't expend much effort into Sharon, so what does that tell you?
Instead of the puffy North Face vest I wish they got her to wear a grey tuxedo-like vest instead.I also hope Sharon will get her comic costume instead of wearing something she could purchase at The Gap or other retail stores.
Unfortunately I have to take what I can get.Sharon can be badass, but she's here as a love interest and to help Steve. I mean, from what I read almost all her scenes are with Steve.
Too bad that's the most I can hope for.I can see Sharon as Maria Hill and in an established relationship with Steve, but not more than that.
Not necessarily because it depends on the movie. Keep in mind that Scarjo even with a wider name recognition wasn't a box office draw BEFORE Marvel/Black Widow. Also I dislike this reasoning because it shouldn't be about who's the bigger actor but instead it should be about presenting Cap's story and characters and doing justice to Cap's mythos.No, the obvious explanation is that they decided to focus more on characters who they felt were more important to the story or were bigger draws than Sharon. Just like they knew putting Scarjo's name in all the trailers for TWS would sell more tickets than EVC. Which sucks for Sharon, but is something that happens with just about every comic book movie.
Sharon got more screen time than I expected, but not as much as I would like. Steve and Sharon's chemistry is much more natural than Banner and Widow.
t:.Oh really?
Emily signed on the role as the female LEAD of the film when she joined the cast and she beat out Emilia Clarke, Felicity Jones, Anna Kendrick, Alison Brie and Mary Elizabeth Winstead, among others.
EVC DID NOT join the film for a 3 min role and they DID NOT cast her for a 3 min role.
http://deadline.com/2013/02/revenges-emily-vancamp-lands-lead-in-captain-america-2-419290/
http://www.slashfilm.com/revenge-st...e-lead-in-captain-america-the-winter-soldier/
I hate how people are trying to blame the actress for the role. She wasn't given much to work with, they did not minimize her role because of EVC fame or acting talent. She is quite popular as well from headlining a major show, Revenge, on ABC for a good number of years.