But, but... I'm confused.
Snyder's the guy who carries his copy of WATCHMEN around with him everywhere he goes... isn't he?
He scribbles notes in it. He cuts up spare copies and uses them for storyboards. There are copies of the trade lying around all over the set for all to refer to, so we're told.
He's the guy who loves and respects this work, the fans... he wants to please Alan Moore with his adaptation. His WATCHMEN won't be for teenyboppers, people will just have to deal with that.
He was so perfect for this gig because of his slavish faithfulness on 300, I read time and time and time and time again.
So why, after all this time has passed since he landed the director's chair back in June 2006, are we hearing that weeks into principal photography he and his valiant band of merry men are STILL apparently debating Veidt's fate?
What was there EVER to debate in the first place, fer chrissakes?
Veidt's been dying in WATCHMEN scripts since the late 80s.
Since Snyder's tenure, at least two Tse scripts have been past him, the second tweaked and returning the setting to 1985 at his insistence... but still conspicuously retaining the Veidt's infamous Death-By-Owlship.
I smell Hollywood BS at work here. And I think we all know who's responsible for having been spouting most of it all along.
Don't be a fool, Zack. If only for the sake of your career, don't screw this up. F uck up WATCHMEN... and f uck your fanboy cred and future genre prospects into the bargain. Don't go and learn the hard way that
Nothing ever ends only holds true in comic books...