spideyboy_1111 said:well.. umm... isnt that obvious? every new x-men movie would have at least 2 new mutants... and gambits the front runner...
yeah gambit and i reallly hope Psylocke.

spideyboy_1111 said:well.. umm... isnt that obvious? every new x-men movie would have at least 2 new mutants... and gambits the front runner...
silentforce3 said:Well with no Halle no Hugh and practically no original cast members (other than Rogue) the future looks bleek talking about money it looks like Halle isn't the only one they can't afford to bring back. Cuz I remember all the whining about "halle's ego" when X3 was still in production.Hugh jackman, Famke Janssen, and Rebecca Romjin want a lot of money too.I just hope if they plan to kill off Storm it is not as ridiculus Cyclops' death. A young X men movie would be okay but with no cameos from the originals I see no success. A movie with Iceman, Kitty, Colosuss, Angel and whatever mediocre characters they add in is dumb. Psylocke is dead, Rogue is cured there were two good characters that were ruined.Gambit is the only Fanfave they haven't wasted in the previous films.
ProfeZZor X said:And how on God's green earth do you figure the movie will suck with these characters? This opportunity could open a whole new door for this franchise. Just because fans of the other (dead) characters don't get a chance to see their favorites on screen, doesn't mean the movie will be a flop. This is a chance for the remaining younger characters to prove themselves as X-Men, under the leadership of Storm, and also introduce some of the other characters not featured before.
Such as: Havok to replace Cyclops, Gambit to replace to Wolverine, Dazzler to replace Jean, and possibly Polaris to replace Storm. Maybe even add in a little extra "color" besides Storm, like Bishop (but his story explained in modern terms).
It might be cost effective for the Studio to introduce these newer characters and give them a two movie deal, rather than pay for the older and more experienced actors. Besides, there's nothing about this movie that coincides with the comic book, so it's easier to get away with a motley crue of mutants on the X-Team.
What plot holes.. tell me and i guarantee you i can solve itCosmic Mind said:that could work, but they still need to solve the plot holes left by X3 to go on on a new story....
spideyboy_1111 said:What plot holes.. tell me and i guarantee you i can solve it
Psylocke8 said:I think he means Xaviers body who's in it? Will he ever come back?
Magneto will he bad again? Does the cure really work or is it invulentary?
If the cure usnt pemanent will rogue stay at the mansion afraa=id of hurting others? Is the government trusting mutants now? Will the government try another way to get rid of muttants? Juggs and Pyro and all of the bad mutants who escaped will they form a terrrost group? Were the Worthington labs destroyed? Beast? Will Scott return? The plotholes are almost endless.
genufine said:I've been saying this before. But one thing I'd definately like to see in X4 would be Cyke VS Wolverine! Thats something comic fans and movie go-ers definately want to see - even a 5 minute fight.
That could be their secondary marketing (internal conflict between Xmen). The first marketing is obviously the main villain.
I also think Sinister should have a trilogy too. With Apocalypse being the third one in the trilogy.
RED-RAIN said:yes, well you dont sign actors for nothing now do you?
she stated, clearly, that they have signed actors...
fair enuff, the actors had some shabby writing to work with, but pyro was so terrible in X3, with his fight with bobby, who was also poor, and actually I am a indie film director, so I HAVE met actors who would do a better job, so I think even by your tight rules, I am free to comment on the poor acting qualityTaiwarriorz21 said:I like all the characters except Anna that plays "Rogue". Xavier, Cyclops, Wolverine, Nightcrawler, Iceman, Pyro, Phoenix, Beast, Angel were all good. IDK Why people gotta have to act like they know someone that would protray a character better than the actor that is already. Have you met any of those that you have to have play the part? No...Leave the decision makin to the directors! They know what their doin. THey do all the hiring and I think they can handle the task that is at hand. They're professionals and you're not! Hugh Jackman does Wolverine JUSTICE! Story CLOSED....Nightcrawler needs to come back. Gambit, and new x-men need to be added. Bigger Villians that Ian McKellen need to be added into the franchise like Mr. Sinister, and Apocalypse.
Taiwarriorz21 said:I like all the characters except Anna that plays "Rogue". Xavier, Cyclops, Wolverine, Nightcrawler, Iceman, Pyro, Phoenix, Beast, Angel were all good. IDK Why people gotta have to act like they know someone that would protray a character better than the actor that is already. Have you met any of those that you have to have play the part? No...Leave the decision makin to the directors! They know what their doin. THey do all the hiring and I think they can handle the task that is at hand. They're professionals and you're not! Hugh Jackman does Wolverine JUSTICE! Story CLOSED....Nightcrawler needs to come back. Gambit, and new x-men need to be added. Bigger Villians that Ian McKellen need to be added into the franchise like Mr. Sinister, and Apocalypse.
Psylocke8 said:^ But cliffhangers or whatever are still impotant people can just leave that there and say we wont have any x4.
Proessor X body swap nobody has anyu idea about so whatever anybody says it is just an opinion It could go anywhere. Why did Xavier choose that body? Nobody knows why. This could go on and on until an x4 comes out or more information is released
ProfeZZor X said:Those are the most idiotic ideas ever.
Reason #1... Cyclops is already dead...No fight... End of story.
Reason #1A... Even if Cyke was alive and Wolverine gutted him, there's no more Cyke for the next movie for him to support the next idiotic idea you listed in Reason #2. Wolverine also gets kicked off the team (Ever think of that?)... Yeah, great way to destroy two of the movie's main characters buddy. That idea is no better that what the producers came up with for the X3 story.
Reason #2... Why should anyone give a flying #&@% about three Mr. Sinister movies? And what the hell could he possibly offer that would take three movies to explain? ... " Oh look at me, I have evil intentions, and I can splice genes"... I believe the movie "Island Of Dr. Moreau" took only one movie to explain.
Reason #3... How the bloody hell are you going to explain the creation and back story of Apocalypse in a modern day movie, AND have him destroyed by the end of that movie? ... Yeah, that's studio money put to good use.
You really need to think about what you're saying before you open your mouth. Because what you're suggesting makes about as much sense as Milligan and Austen's run.
'spideyboy_1111 said:*my head hurts...*
can i ask how old you are? because you completely arn't understanding what i'm talking about... either that or not wording what you mean correctly. Again, everything you have stated, is a cliff hanger, not a plot hole. All of wich would be answered in the next installment.. whether its a sequal... or spinoff. Also.. alot of audience members never even saw the after the credits scene due to them getting up and leaving... and those who did.. who didn't understand... if they care enough, would rewatch the movie and notice plainly.. that theres the scene with Xavier teaching the class explaining exactly what he did. We also dont need to know who the body was persay.. because its just a random human (unless its explained in a future movie) that is brain dead... and unable to live a consious life off of a medical bed (wich was explained when xavier taught the class)
Yeah? They also signed Peter Mayhew one for a Starwars 7, but you don't see that happening do you?RED-RAIN said:yes, well you dont sign actors for nothing now do you?
she stated, clearly, that they have signed actors...
there will be an x4...
they obviously havent decided wether they want a new bred or not, wich is easy to see why i mean the previous cast would be easier to generate money from as its easily recognisable and are the staple characters... new actors could represent a slide in profits maybe...
we will just have to wait and see
ProfeZZor X said:Those are the most idiotic ideas ever.
Reason #1... Cyclops is already dead...No fight... End of story.
Reason #1A... Even if Cyke was alive and Wolverine gutted him, there's no more Cyke for the next movie for him to support the next idiotic idea you listed in Reason #2. Wolverine also gets kicked off the team (Ever think of that?)... Yeah, great way to destroy two of the movie's main characters buddy. That idea is no better that what the producers came up with for the X3 story.
Reason #2... Why should anyone give a flying #&@% about three Mr. Sinister movies? And what the hell could he possibly offer that would take three movies to explain? ... " Oh look at me, I have evil intentions, and I can splice genes"... I believe the movie "Island Of Dr. Moreau" took only one movie to explain.
Reason #3... How the bloody hell are you going to explain the creation and back story of Apocalypse in a modern day movie, AND have him destroyed by the end of that movie? ... Yeah, that's studio money put to good use.
You really need to think about what you're saying before you open your mouth. Because what you're suggesting makes about as much sense as Milligan and Austen's run.
spideyboy_1111 said:ok 1) your being way too harsh...
2) no on screen death means there's a huge chance they could apt to
bring him back
3) Cyke and Wolvie have fought many a times in the comics... Wolverine doesnt have to "gut him" i suggest reading Astonishing X-men #1 for a good example. He also wouldnt have to be kicked off the team.. wich also didnt
4) OK.... well as i dont think there should be 3 sinister movies... he should have one. and you sound really imature btw...![]()
5) Apocaypse though.. i dont think would work in the movie verse.. thats why i would be ok with just a nod from him... maybe sinister creates the horsemen and calls it "project apocalypse" or something..
6) and finally, you have no room to talk about opening ones mouth before they speakyou just proved that.
genufine said:Those are the most idiotic ideas ever? This guys is pretty sour. What are you like - 11? You are obviously losing more reputation as you keep posting - so keep going.
Anyways, #1 - Do you think Cyclops and Wolverine have never fought before in the comics? You OBVIOUSLY dont know much about them fighting so I suggest you shut your mouth. AoA, Ultimate, and other comics have shown this. It would never end with Wolverine gutting cyke - another reason to show your limited reasoning. oh and btw he isnt dead - believe it.
#2 - Why would anyone give a flying rats A$$ about Magneto in three movies. Now your limited reasoning is going to say it as Stryker in X2, but Sinister being the main villain for another trilogy was the same concept as Magneto being the same villain for the first trilogy. Apocalypse can be introduced as a cliffhanger in the 2nd movie.
#3 - Simple. X3 was able to do a CURE, PHOENIX, tons of new characters, small plot holes (kitty/iceman/rogue) and other things. Dont you think with better writers they could do this?
Finally, I suggest you post. I like to see you're comebacks. I actually do enjoy it. Now why dont you think a bit more mr. Professor. LOL!
1 - Not harsh, lol. Hes actually just dissing himself.
2 - Agreed. My point exactly.
3 - He wouldnt know.
4 - Sinister one movie would be too small. I think he needs to be the main villain and start something on Apocalype by mid #2 movie. And as for the immature comment, again hes only dissing himself.
5 - I think Apocalypse will work. I just think they will twist it a bit( ie. phoenix and personality disorder). Something like making wolverine part of the horsemen or some stuff like that.
6) Hes proving alot of things to everyone here![]()