Herr Logan
Avenger
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2004
- Messages
- 12,393
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Flonk said:Wow. You really need to lighten up.
Lighten up, dumb down... it's all the same in this case.

Flonk said:Wow. You really need to lighten up.
Flonk said:Wow. You really need to lighten up.
Gregatron said:I'm tired of all this.
Why is it that back when comics were aimed at younger people (and written as all-ages friendly), the material had so much more dignity and class?
UGH.
TheWhiteSpider said:My friend, I think the real question is: "Why isn't it that way today and why does it look less and less likely that it'll ever be that way again?" Unfortunately, we know most of those questions' answers, and they aren't pretty.
Herr Logan said:How messed up is it when you find yourself wishing for the "old days" when comics were what they should be, when you weren't even alive at the time?
I'm 24 and I find myself reminiscing about the Silver Age. Thank God for the Essential volumes. Second-hand nostalgia as discount prices.
![]()
Herr Logan said:How messed up is it when you find yourself wishing for the "old days" when comics were what they should be, when you weren't even alive at the time?
I'm 24 and I find myself reminiscing about the Silver Age. Thank God for the Essential volumes. Second-hand nostalgia as discount prices.
![]()
So JMS and Joey Q know they screwed up...
stillanerd said:Just so you know, all of our reactions to the Wizard Interview with Joe Quesada and JMS made to Fandom Wank Celebrate, panic, or complain how you see fit.
stillanerd said:Just so you know, all of our reactions to the Wizard Interview with Joe Quesada and JMS made to Fandom Wank here and hereCelebrate, panic, or complain how you see fit.
Herr Logan said:You and Greg got some spotlight!
They called you "whiners." How adorable is that? I think I'll change my opinion, since I wouldn't ever want to be a considered a "whiner" by whoever the hell runs that site or posted on it, or however this Wank thing works.
![]()
TheWhiteSpider said:Wow. An online forum for people who.. monitor online forums. For "wankiness." And feature the results in article format.. For discussion. Still, you better give me back that bottle of Excedrin I loaned you.
Themanofbat said:Well, I'll be 39 in the fall, and I'm very happy to have been reading comics in the 70's and thanks in part to Marvel Tales, I was able to get a good fix on "early" Spider-Man issues.
I know that stories are currently written to be in nice little 6 issue arcs so that they can be packaged into TPB's. Nice little begining, action in the middle, and an end where the staus quo remains the same... <yawn>
Give me the days where action occured, and sub-plots developped (be it single panel, or one page sub-plots). And when the current action ended, sub-plots became the foreffront of the action, and yet even more sub-plots developped. Sometimes, there were longer sub-plots the ended after many issues had passed. But the point was that despite constant Spidey action, there were reasons (aka the sub-plots) that kept me coming back for the next issue. Thus the never-ending soap opera that was the Amazing Spider-Man kept this kid running back to the store every 28 days.
Why comics can't be written THAT way these days, beyond the dollar value of the TPB market, is beyond me.
![]()
dan1 said:Right, the point being that it wasn't so formulaic and therefore so much more enjoyable, simply for the spontaneity.
Joe Quesada had a business plan and speech that got a standing 'O' from the suits a couple of years ago, that said 'Marvel will focus on Trade Paper Backs,' but why that means the trade paperback has to have a beginning, middle and end is ludicrous.
You can smoosh 6 issues into a tpb that are all one-shots and it would still be just as worth it to the Trade Paper back consumers, who just want an easier way to read and organize and stay up to date with their hero.
Herr Logan said:Spider-Man comics in the early days definitely usually had a more or less predictable formula to them (especially when new villains were introduced).
It's not that a formula is bad in and of itself, but it's that the current formula is a bad one. I like the formula from the early days. It worked well and didn't come off like an obvious attempt to cheat the fans.
Also, the fact that Stan Lee filled every page with lots of words that were not merely repetitive filler (it was often something said previously in another issue, but it wasn't that over-and-over, stuttering, mindless bull$hit that Bendis can't live without) makes a real difference. That's another thing Joey Q should come out and say Stan "spoiled" the fans with. God forbid you have a real writer doing several books at once instead of a an overgrown teenager who rarely ever writes in a character's "voice" instead of his own.
![]()
Flonk said:Or it could be because the abuse you guys pour on people who have different opinions makes them not want to post. What's the point of trying to have a discussion, if you are trying to make a point and instead of debating you are called a mindless follower and a looser.
Doc Destruction said:Omg they linked this post lol. I'm such a whiner!
dan1 said:True, a formula then as well, but like you said, a better one. One that had plots, sub plots and sub sub plots, that ended in different intervals and a weaving web that eventually connected them to Peter Parker.
Bendis is completely over-rated, I agree. As long as you are respecting the character theme, history, continuity timeline, and you have some form of originality, I would rather have more dialogue than less, even if it's thought bubbles when the mask is on.
Thought bubbles were huge in my book.
ScottishFogg said:it's always refreshing when leadership can admit to their mistakes.
but for the record, i liked "Sins Past." i can understand why some people, or a lot of people, didn't like it, but it was good, classic human drama.
i haven't read "The Other" yet, though, so i'll refrain from commenting on it.