Bane is Venom, Joker is Morbius, and Batman is Vulture
And this was the one Sony/Spidey spin-off movie I was kinda on-board for.
Sheesh.
I just dont understand where they came up with morbius of all people. Ever since twilight ruined the vampires reputation there havent been any vampire movies come out that I know of. And hes not a very popular spidey villain. Should of made this movie in 2009 when the craze was happening
Wow, I've long heard about Morbius not making it into Blade 2 but I never saw this deleted scene from the 1st movie before. That's really cool.
Who knows, Morbius could bring back the genre's dignity. As for the character not being "popular", hey; who would have guessed that first successful theatrical movie based on a Marvel hero was a c-string character named Blade?
Don't get me wrong, this could end up sucking(no pun intended), but I think we still need to hear more details, like the premise, to be either really optimistic or pessimistic about this. That's just me. The director has a "decent" track in his short resume(Life, Easy Money) and the writers(Lost In Space) show to have potential. Much like Venom, which so far is looking good, this is something to be neutral about at this point, imo.
My first exposure to Morbius was this:
I still remember picking up this issue (along with a reprint of Amazing Spider-Man #101). This needs to follow the Blade formula. Low budget and R-Rated. More horror thriller, less superhero romp.
Speaking of Blade, anyone else remember Morbius' (deleted) cameo from the first Blade film?
I guess I'm mostly worried that these spin-off movies are going to result in Spider-Man leaving the MCU to join this Sony-verse. Otherwise, I feel like Sony can make as many spin-off movies as they want to as long as Spider-Man continues to be in the MCU.
What's the drawback?
I hear some news about the sequel to Spider-Man: Homecoming, I feel happy, then Sony makes another spin-off announcement and fuels my depression. Again.
Ehhh.