Homecoming Sony E-mails on wikileaks

RE: Marvel Announces Phase 3 Slate!
Date 2014-11-04 14:00:05

Michael,



When you have a few minutes please give me a call.



Thanks,



Ike



From: Lynton, Michael
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2014 8:20 AM
To: IP
Subject: Re: Marvel Announces Phase 3 Slate!



You and I tried.

On Nov 4, 2014, at 5:14 AM, IP wrote:



Michael,





Putting Spider-Man in Captain America 3 with Chris Evans and with Robert Downey Jr. as Iron Man doesn't provide much benefit to Marvel, but it definitely provides a significant amount of benefit to Sony and to Spider-Man.



You can see in the attached the long term opportunity.



Best,



Ike
 
Re: Fox Dates 'Wolverine,' 'Fantastic Four' Sequels and a Mystery Marvel Project

But yes
Funny
Or alex

On Mar 20, 2014, at 9:40 PM, "Pascal, Amy" <wrote:


WE BETTER HURRY
WOULDNT IT BE FUNNY IF IT WAS SOMETHING WITH MARK

On Mar 20, 2014, at 9:31 PM, "wrote:

Dont know

On Mar 20, 2014, at 9:28 PM, "Pascal, Amy" <> wrote:


JUST SAW THAT
WHAT IS THE MYSTERY PROJECT

On Mar 20, 2014, at 9:27 PM, "wrote:




Begin forwarded message:


From: Variety Breaking News
Date: March 20, 2014 at 9:25:31 PM PDT

Subject: Fox Dates 'Wolverine,' 'Fantastic Four' Sequels and a Mystery Marvel Project

20th Century Fox has announced the release dates for three upcoming Marvel films, including a my...
&#8203;
 
FW: Marvel Misc.
Just FYI on some random Marvel matters.

Everything seems to be resolving amicably but perhaps coincidentally or just because with ASM2 coming up, there&#8217;s an increase in volume, it seems like there&#8217;s been a minor increase in tensions.



From Eric Baum (re:our proposed use of Kingpin in an online Tumblr promo which Marvel didn&#8217;t like on a creative basis):



Follow-up. After discussion with Dwight, the digital team will let the use of Kingpin character go as a battle not needed at this time. Dwight will have some discussion with Cohen about the strategy of the Bugle program and so on but not push the issue. I did discuss this in light of the concurrent issue with the ASM promotion in the Avengers Alliance game and he agrees that we should not make any change in the agreement that would allow Marvel to use the game and an enhanced relationship to the SPMN character to promote their pictures. He pointed out that there was an opportunity on the first picture where we wanted to have a small mention of Stark Industries (the Iron Man related entity) in one of our Bugle blog posts and Cohen adamantly rejected this linkage with the other more expanded Marvel Universe. Dwight is clear that in dealings with Marvel having some value to trade is an essential part of maintaining an effective cooperation.





From: Gumpert, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 4:35 PM

Subject: RE: (I) The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - Marvel Family Interactive Items / Call To Action



Got it, thx&#8230;

From: Steinberg, David
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 4:30 PM

Subject: FW: (I) The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - Marvel Family Interactive Items / Call To Action



In light of the aggressive position Marvel took on the Spiderman/XMen promo issue, just wanted to give you a head&#8217;s up on the below in case it comes up in other conversations (or, if not coincidental, as an indication of an overall escalation of temperature).



Though it doesn&#8217;t seem as though there&#8217;s anything to do right now, feel free to reach out to Eric if you need more detailed information.



From: Baum, Eric
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 4:24 PM
: RE: (I) The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - Marvel Family Interactive Items / Call To Action



We had a follow-up conversation today on this issue. We pitched the promotion details we want to do in the Avengers Alliance game. Seth Lehman was pushing hard on the idea that we should amend the agreement to allow Marvel to do promotions of all their movies in the Marvel Family games at all times. This is not allowed under the current agreement. When advised that we did not want to amend the agreement and wanted to take these on a case by case basis he indicated that he needed to take that back to his group and get back to us. It came up that they would like to do this with the next Captain America picture and we asked if that was the trade they wanted to do. He backed away from this straight trade instead wanting the complete freedom to do this on all the Marvel pictures.

Seth asked what is the harm to us if they are able to promote their pictures in this manner? The fact is that we have only the one Marvel picture to promote every few years whereas Marvel has pictures every year. It probably is a very valuable vehicle for them to have this access. We did suggest that this may not be a problem to do and they could come to us whenever they want to do this and we would evaluate each situation on its facts/merits. Obviously if they have to come to us for a consent it means we have something they want and we may get something we want each time. I expect we will hear back from them perhaps in some escalated manner. EB



From: Baum, Eric
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2014 3:33 PM

Subject: FW: (I) The Amazing Spider-Man 2 - Marvel Family Interactive Items / Call To Action



Had a discussion with Marvel today about doing a promotion of ASM2 in the Marvel Avengers Alliance game during our release window. We did this on ASM1 and it was quite successful. If I read the provisions correctly (attached) (just try it is kind of painful) Marvel is barred from doing any direct promotion or a call to action for one of their pictures (a Defined Production) in the Marvel Family Interactive Item. In today&#8217;s call Seth Lehman was asking that we amend to agreement to permit this as the way to allow us to do a promotion with a call to action of the ASM2 picture,. My response was no we don&#8217;t need to amend the agreement, if there are going to be exceptions to this rule they should be negotiated and agreed on a case by case basis with the contractual default remain that they cannot do it. I have a further call scheduled for next Tuesday. Ira, I would like your take on the rule. Thanks EB
 
Re: Give Marvel back the rights to Spider-Man

Yup.

On Jul 15, 2014, at 3:45 PM, "Pascal, Amy" m> wrote:

ahhhhhh got it
they are capable of anything then

And I was just informed that bob Iger approached Kaz at sun valley with Ike's proposal. That is what made me suspicious.

On Jul 15, 2014, at 3:28 PM, "Pascal, Amy" <A> wrote:

it gotten these for the past 12 years
it just stops

On Jul 15, 2014, at 12:27 PM, Lynton, Michael wrote:


I am sure you are getting this. Let's try and not make this a press issue.


Begin forwarded message:

From: Asad Mehdizade <[email protected]>

Dear Michael Lynton,

I just signed James Tafaroji's petition "Sony Pictures: Give Marvel back the rights to Spider-Man" on Change.org.


Give Marvel back the rights to Spider-Man

Sincerely,
Asad Mehdizade
 
Re: [Deadline.com] Marvel Starts Doctor Strange Search: Tom Hardy, Benedict Cumberbatch Early Wish Listers

Fw: [Deadline.com] Marvel Starts Doctor Strange Search: Tom Hardy, Benedict Cumberbatch Early Wish Listers

I think this is just further evidence to me that drew should be the one to tell the world about the movie at comicon. And I was als thinking, we don't lead with the move of asm 3. We just say drew has this amazing story for sin six and has to be next in the continuity of the story....which is actually true.

"ELEVEN" -- you rule...he can't turn this down. It's the part he was born to play!

_____
From: Drew Goddard
Sent: Fri Jun 06 20:12:59 2014
Subject: Re: [Deadline.com] Marvel Starts Doctor Strange Search: Tom Hardy, Benedict Cumberbatch Early Wish Listers


I&#8217;m gonna write him up a note this weekend. But, off the top of my head, some possible talking points are:

&#8212; We&#8217;re doing something different &#8212; it&#8217;s time to celebrate the bad guys for once.

&#8212; We&#8217;re inspired by the classic team/mission of movies: Dirty Dozen, Magnificent Seven, Guns of Navarone. We want that spirit, that SWAGGER.

&#8212; If the Spider-man franchise is the Beatles, then we&#8217;re the Sex Pistols

&#8212; Flint Marco is gonna steal the show

&#8212; The character is pure id &#8212; the anarchic enthusiast of the team. A chance to have FUN while celebrating being bad.

&#8212; Tom embodies that anarchy, that triumphant nihilism &#8212; we&#8217;ve seen him tap into that spirt before in roles like Bronson, but now we have the chance to crank the volume up to ELEVEN.

&#8212; He&#8217;s gonna storm through London at the end like God-****ing-zilla. That is not purple prose. He&#8217;s going to be AS TALL AS A SKYSCRAPER in the third act of the movie. What does Dr. Strange have? Magic tricks? **** you, magic tricks &#8212; we&#8217;ve got a skyscraper Tom Hardy knocking down buildings!!!!

dg



On Jun 6, 2014, at 7:37 PM, Pascal, Amy <om> wrote:


Make me sound smart
Passion I got

On Jun 6, 2014, at 7:27 PM, "Drew Goddard" <com> wrote:

I&#8217;m in 100%. Couldn&#8217;t love him more.

On Jun 6, 2014, at 7:25 PM, Tolmach, Matthew <

Not greenlit

On Jun 6, 2014, at 7:13 PM, "Pascal, Amy" <m> wrote:


Already in splinter cell

On Jun 6, 2014, at 7:12 PM, "Tolmach, Matthew" <> wrote:


he's booked in inarritu movie sept til feb
then open with people chasing him (dr strange, splinter cell)&#8230;
wigham thinks it's the perfect time to engage, eventho we don't have a script.
he started googling sandman and is digging it
i'm gonna put drew in touch
let's discuss&#8230;
m

On Jun 6, 2014, at 7:00 PM, Pascal, Amy wrote:


Go for it

On Jun 6, 2014, at 6:59 PM, "Tolmach, Matthew" <> wrote:

Jack talked to him about it today. He likes the
Sound of ours. Feige chasing him tho.

On Jun 6, 2014, at 6:58 PM, "Pascal, Amy" <> wrote:


Go for it
Call Bryan and I forgot the other guy
If u think we can get it done without script
**** THOES guys





Begin forwarded message:
 
Last edited:
Re: AFTER 5 TODAY THATS WHEN THERE CALL WITH MARVEL IS

Date: March 20, 2014 at 11:17:21 AM PDT

To: "Pascal, Amy" <

THEY HAVE THEIR CALL WITH MARVEL AT 5 TODAY
MARVEL IS HOPING FOR NO LEAKS
SO I SAY WE ARE GOOD TO GO AFTER THAT
SHORT OF A MAJOR SCREW UP
On Mar 20, 2014, at 11:14 AM, Pascal, Amy wrote:

SPIDERMAN IS AMAZING
TRAILER IS GETTING CRAZY
GREAT RESPONSE AND PEOPLE ARE STARTING TO
SEE THE MOVIE......LOVING IT
MARC WEBB DID A FABULOUS JOB AND SONY LOVES HIM
MARC IS DIRECTING THE" 'NEXT "SPIDERMAN MOVIE
ALEX KURTSMAN AND JEFF PICKNER ARE WRITING IT

IT IS CURRENTLY SLATED FOR JUNE 2016
(NO REASON TO SAY OTHER WISE)


DREW GODDARD IS
WRITING AND DIRECTING SINISTER SIX
WE HOPE BOTH MOVIES WILL COME OUT IN 2016
(NO MENTION OF SPIEY BEING IN THAT MOVIE)

WE ARE ALSO DOING VENOM ALEX KURTAMN
AND ED SOLOMAN ARE WRITING AND ALEX WILL DIRECT
DREW GODDARD ED SOLOMAN BOB ORCI ALEX KURTZMAN
AND JEFF PICKNER ARE EXEC PRODUCING ALL 3 MOVIES
MATT TOLMAC AND AVI ARE PRODUCING ALL THREE MOVIES

SONY HAS FRANCHISES.....SPIDERMAN, SINISTER SIX, VENOM
WE ARE BEING SMART ABOUT THE SPIERMAN UNIVERSE BUT WE
HAD TO DO IT BASED ON STORIES THAT ARE INTERWOVEN AND CHAR
ACTERS THAT INTERACT

SONY HAS ITS **** TOGETHER....GHOSTBUSTERS, SINISTER SIX, VENOM
SP
 
Venom

LETS TALK THIS IS REALLY SIMILAR TO WHAT MATT PITCHED ME THIS AM ABOUT VENOM WHICH HE DOESNT THINK IS A MOVIE ON ITS OWN BUT THAT SPIDERMAN ANS SS ARE THE TEAM IN THE NEXT MOVIE HE GOES TO THEM FOR HELP/……MAYBE FIGHTING CARNAGE IR HE WEARS THE BLACK SUIT BUT ALL THE SS GUYS THINK ITS LAME AND HE TAKES IT OFF AND IT FALLS INTO THE WRONG HANDS

Wait, what!?! I thought that was just a joke! :wow::facepalm:
 
Re: marvel announcements

Date 2014-10-28 21:23:43
From o'connor, rachel
To pascal, amy
That is the ultimate ******* move
And though they would never admit it-- they would love drew's movie!

> On Oct 28, 2014, at 1:34 PM, "Pascal, Amy" wrote:
>
> ONE WEEK
>> On Oct 28, 2014, at 12:34 PM, O'Connor, Rachel wrote:
>>
>> they moved dr strange to two weeks before sini six.
>> and they announced captain marvel but not til 2018.
>
 
Last edited:
Re: marvel snl sketch

Date 2014-09-30 14:54:39
From tolmach, matthew
To
The chair


On Sep 30, 2014, at 7:54 AM, Pascal, Amy <> wrote:

I died at the shopping cart

Sent from my Sony Xperia Z2
On Sep 30, 2014, at 7:52 AM, "T> wrote:

Was kind of brilliant


On Sep 30, 2014, at 7:47 AM, Pascal, Amy <


Sent from my Sony Xperia Z2
Begin forwarded message:

From: rachel oconnor <om>
Date: September 29, 2014 at 10:18:28 PM PDT
To: "Pascal, Amy" <m>
Subject: marvel snl sketch

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0c-bFzkO9O4
 
RE: Kirby/Marvel
Date 2014-09-26 18:11:14
From venger, leonard
To weil, leahwolfson, aimee


Spoke to Eli &#8211; settlement confidential &#8211; S Ct Petition withdrawn &#8211; our rights are intact and unaffected &#8211; he said in jest that he&#8217;d tell us all settlement terms if we&#8217;d contribute &#8211; so seems like a monetary settlement without granting Kirby heirs any IP rights &#8211; I told him as to our contributing that I was not THAT interested in knowing the terms.







From: Venger, Leonard
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2014 10:51 AM
To: Weil, Leah
Cc: Wolfson, Aimee
Subject: Kirby/Marvel





Good news &#8211; the case settled. I have a call in to Eli to secure whatever details he&#8217;ll reveal , mainly though to confirm that our SM rights are intact and unaffected.
 
Avi nervous

Re: Could Spider-Man Join the Marvel Cinematic Universe?

Date 2014-10-08 05:20:00
From tolmach, matthew
To avi@l, amy

No. Right, amy?

Sent from my iPad

Could Spider-Man Join the Marvel Cinematic Universe?

Date 2014-10-08 01:13:28
From avi
To pascal, amy, tolmach, matthew
Is this for real?

http://www.ign.com/articles/2014/10/07/could-spider-man-join-the-marvel-cinematic-universe
Good thing avi had to go through that and got the boot :argh:
 
Lmao Avi. That poor bas***d. What's he doing right now?
 
Re:

I like best the idea that the bad guys were good guys and might be good again -- it is an awesome problem that seems unique to spider-man

----- Original Message -----
From: Pascal, Amy

Sent: Tue Jan 14 22:52:33 2014
Subject: Re:

Something different than a trilogy or an on going story ....what is gonna surprise you ...that's where we find it what don't we expect....in the greatest battle of his life ......

----- Original Message -----
From: Pascal, Amy
h
Sent: Tue Jan 14 22:48:47 2014
Subject: Fw:

Can u find meaning in there somewhere

----- Original Message -----
From: Pascal, Amy
Sent: Tue Jan 14 22:48:13 2014
Subject: Re:

The un marvel marvel world that is rooted in humanity but instead of it being like a trilogy or a story this is the opening of a world that will be unleashed .....somewhere in there

----- Original Message -----
From: Pascal, Amy

Sent: Tue Jan 14 22:45:24 2014

Maybe people have to see the movie cuz it is a set up to the entire world of the richest most varied interestinga hero and the anti heros marvel has to offer .... A world where the bad guys were good guys and may be good guys again a world where the "goodest " guy also has some guilt and "darkness" in him

Where heros and villians are most interesting because all of them have the sad fraility of being a human being and that this spiderman is the key to being part of this entire world
 
There are too many story lines and we need to choose which ones we are focusing on and lift out the other ones, ie; could reduce father arc to just Roosevelt?



Could cut out plane crash and Richard destroying spiders and start on armored car – don’t start with Spider-Man….let the danger/stakes to NYC build first and then have Spider-Man enter the scene heroically.



Tone down Paul Giamatti performance, so he seems a bit more menacing and less cartoonish.



If you cut Richard from the opening and the plane crash maybe you could instead do Harry coming home and seeing Norman at the top of the movie as a cold open.



Really love Electro – feels like you may not need the scene in his apartment, which makes him seems completely crazy and hard to relate too.



Like the idea that eel goes in his mouth and instead of burrowing, you see it glow within him…



Need to set up the Power Plant earlier, visually.



Seems like the movie switches pov’s a lot…why are we in Max’s pov during the car chase, worth looking at this playing out from Spidey’s pov.



There could be a better way to reveal that Peter is missing graduation – maybe when you cut Gwen you cut to the wide shot?



Tiny note – don’t think Peter would lie to Gwen about sirens --- maybe he just downplays it…



Stan Lee Cameo – maybe need a little more emphasis on Peter here trying to get out of his costume and not be in seen…set up a little more the pressure of the principal getting closer and closer to calling his name.



Instead of seeing the ghost of Captain Stacy, can just here the voice in Peter’s head and maybe flash back to the last movie? Don’t think we should add Cap Stacy back into car chase.



There is too much back and forth with Peter and Gwen – can we recut the Dim Sum scene so that it doesn’t feel so repetitive of their break-up in the last movie – Can Peter be more honorable and definitive and less wishy-washy?



Why do we need a year to pass…



Harry story feels like the main plot of the movie – Peter should look into the past b/c of Harry – maybe find some photos of them together as kids…use obsession wall more to set up this part of his past not just what happened to parents.



Not sure what Peter learns at Roosevelt is entirely correct. We’re distracted by the idea that Peter became Spider-Man b/c of his father’s blood --- all this special back story with his super-scientist dad fights with the idea that Peter is normal kid from Queens who becomes the greatest super-hero in the world…



Andrew’s performance is all over the place…a lot of crying and then a lot of mania. Hard to track him emotionally sometimes. It undermines his reaction to Gwen’s death b/c he gets upset and emotional a lot.



Don’t like the idea that May tells Peter his parents were spies b/c two seconds later he finds out they are not and it again fights with the idea that he’s an ordinary kid.



Like the idea that May finds out he’s Spider-Man – finds his costume instead of just the rosemary harris wink-wink all the time.



Kind of like the morgue, but hate the dancing mortician – cliché.



Are you using VFX to show how Electro is travelling from one point to another (bursts of electricity).



Need to underscore capture of goblin…more sirens as you linger on the clock 1;21, 1:22 am (nice touch).



Surveillance scene should be about following Harry not Peter…no one should be following Peter.



Can Electro hum Itsy-Bitsy Spider before he plays it electronically…maybe we can use this again.



Maybe intercut the ending montage and hearing Gwen’s speech with someone going into special projects and revealing more easter eggs and see that the rhino case has been broke into and the suit is missing…great way to transition to rhino ending.



Don’t need Aunt May in the kitchen.



Spider-man needs to feel more directly responsible for preventing the planes from crashing.


Don’t show New Yorkers looting.

Kevin Feige's feedback on what seems like a cut of ASM2? Totally spot on I think.

"Andrew’s performance is all over the place…a lot of crying and then a lot of mania. Hard to track him emotionally sometimes. It undermines his reaction to Gwen’s death b/c he gets upset and emotional a lot."

LOL! Looks like Feige didn't like Garfield as Spider-Man. I kind of agree with him.
 
Cap vs Asm2

Its done
But tell me when you need material in theatre
and when to show footage exactly and I will make it happen
Just got off with jeff

_____
From: Taylor, Peter
To: Pascal, Amy
Sent: Wed Jan 15 09:19:06 2014
Subject: FW: ASM2

As discussed.



From: Taylor, Peter
Sent: 15 January 2014 11:29
To: Clark, Nigel

Subject: ASM2



Dear Nigel



Following on from my comments on yesterdays call I do want to clarify some of our genuine concerns as we move closer to the release of the above.



The fact that Captain America has an edge over us in the tracking at this stage comes as no surprise with the full weight of the Marvel/Disney machine behind it. Their willingness to show footage and release material has given them a real foothold in the UK which has left us in a catch up position with only a few weeks to go. If we are to make up the ground and take the dominant position then a great deal has to happen here and very quickly. To quote you from last night &#8220;we need to out Marvel Marvel&#8221; and at the moment, and in the foreseeable future we are not. As the focus groups proved there is an awareness for our film, and a level of interest, but that real desire to engage only truly comes into play when audiences see what we are talking about. The response to the trailers has been great and the materials shown to all groups immediately raised their appetite for the film but if we are not out there, or online, then that demand can never increase. It is this basic level that Marvel are doing so well enabling them to go forward. Their willingness and confidence to screen footage has helped enormously, something we can easily match with a far better and more commercial film. The responses to the scenes shown at the summit were fantastic for those that saw it. It would we believe help us take some big steps forward screening it here in London by the end of January.



Following the call Stuart asked Ann-E for an update on in theatre materials and she advises that there will be some more &#8220;in February&#8221; and the rest two weeks before we open. Again we know how hard Ann-E works on our behalf but if we don&#8217;t have material to plaster theatres in February half term and then throughout March even more ground will be lost. That alone I would imagine makes a weekly email from you up to release regarding tracking issues an inevitability. If there are timing issues we should be looking at printing locally from what we have to at least get something out there. Also the wraps for online are promised &#8220;in February&#8221; &#8211; but we need concrete dates as early as possible. It feels that all of these delivery dates are being set based on a Domestic calendar despite the fact that we, and several others, open three weeks ahead.



Please believe me when I say we are well aware of the difficulties faced in getting approvals and content prepared but we cannot be in a position of having committed ourselves to a very big estimate as part of a $1b target and not getting close to having the means to achieve it. Today, and it worries the hell out of me, I do not feel confident we can.



I hope this email is taken in the spirit in which it is written, not as it may read in parts as a critique, but to make everyone fully aware of the challenges we have here on the ground. All we want to do is fulfil our promise that this chapter in our most valuable series of movies will become the biggest grosser in the franchise&#8217; history and that our commitment and enthusiasm to achieving that is given the impetus it so desperately needs.



My best as always



Peter
 
"Bag guy team up"

Yep

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 10, 2014, at 11:08 PM, Pascal, Amy wrote:
>
> Can you help me think this through tomorrow
>
> Amy
>
> Sent from my Sony Xperia Z2
>
>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 11:07 PM,
>> Who in the comic book world has cred... Who could do an on line story?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 11:06 PM, Pascal, Amy wrote:
>>>
>>> Not the least bit coherent
>>>
>>> Sent from my Sony Xperia Z2
>>>
>>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 11:04 PM, "jr
>>>> Is Stan lee still coherent?
>>>>
>>>> Can he add another character to spider world to Kosher it.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe an on line leak?
>>>>
>>>> Give you a few more options?
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>
>>>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 11:00 PM, Pascal, Amy wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I only have the spidey universe not the marvel universe
>>>>> And in it are only his villains and relatives and girlfriend
>>>>> No superhero team up here unless you include venom or do a bag guy team up
>>>>>
>>>>> Marvel want to put him in cap 3 and become the producers
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my Sony Xperia Z2
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 10:51 PM, "jr>>>
>>>>>> Sounds tuff given all the marvel stuff...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> First 2 Spider-Man's where the bench mark
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 10:43 PM, Pascal, Amy wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One villain
>>>>>>> Scarey not cg
>>>>>>> Less costumes
>>>>>>> Less cg
>>>>>>> Less extravazenza
>>>>>>> No love story
>>>>>>> No aunt may
>>>>>>> Very simple
>>>>>>> Great action
>>>>>>> Peter funnier
>>>>>>> Bring back Jonah Jamison
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my Sony Xperia Z2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 10:39 PM, "wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I liked first 2 movies.
>>>>>>>> Sam know what he'd do with it?
>>>>>>>> Is anyone else pursuing it?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 10:35 PM, Pascal, Amy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> First two were great
>>>>>>>>> Third one way better than marks movies
>>>>>>>>> I think
>>>>>>>>> At this point I don't know
>>>>>>>>> But he told me I was nuts to do as
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sent from my Sony Xperia Z2
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 10:33 PM, "" wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Does he have a good take?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> By the end he had gone a little Joel Schumacher...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Do you know this partial novel ur trying to buy?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> We made an offer Friday based in on Chris Goldberg the book guy we hired from fox.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Apparently, it's heating up.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Not sure I get it completely.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Curious what your take was...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 10:25 PM, Pascal, Amy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Should I bring him back
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my Sony Xperia Z2
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 10:23 PM, Pascal, Amy wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sam rami?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from
 
"Third one (raimis SM3) way better than marks movies"
 
Last edited:
Spider compared to Avengers

I don't have real numbers or info from Disney so this is gut for now:

In order from best to worst:

SpiderMan 3
SpiderMan2
Amazing SpiderMan2
Amazing SpiderMan
SpiderMan

Avengers was a Huge success for them. 6 Characters with IronMan in the lead. Hulk which was a merch disappointment got resurrected. I would compare it to our SpiderMan2.

Cap has grown and become better. At first it was slow and subject to only "American". Avengers and good movies have helped build. I see it more now than iron man.

I think iron man as a stand alone superhero has become as big deal for Marvel in merch. I think I heard this week from Marvel though that iron man merch has slowed a bit.






Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 21, 2014, at 8:44 PM, "Pascal, Amy" wrote:
>
> do you think amazing two was better than amazing one in terms of merchandise
> and how would you rank
> all spidey merch
> 2007
> 2012
> 2014
> with
> avengers now
> cap now
> iron man now
>> On Oct 21, 2014, at 8:16 PM, Leon, George wrote:
>>
>> Hi. Quick answers:
>>
>> 1. Yes on bond. The conditions all seemed doable to David and team. Sent out a document as well with terms and ideas. Should know more soon.
>>
>> 2. SpiderMan. The biggest year ever for SpiderMan merch was probably our SpiderMan 3. Worse is probably amazing SpiderMan 1. I can ask Disney tomorrow how it stands and how it compares to others. Avengers did well but didn't sustain. Iron Man has done well and captain America does better in the US. I did get a call from josh Silverman about doing our small group talk when he gets back the week of Nov10.
>>
>> -G.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Oct 21, 2014, at 8:05 PM, "Pascal, Amy" wrote:
>>>
>>> two questions
>>>
>>> did you speak to bond folks and tell them our conditions
>>>
>>> when was the spiderman merch at its highest
>>> what is it today
>>> avengers?
>>> cap?
 
On the other thing also (sm mcu related)

Subject: On the other thing also

51. Do we want them to co partner or produce ss or girl movie or any other movie
52. Should we give them a one pic Id we do it at all cuz if they just own it forever they will behave worse then if it's just one movie
53. Can we do a sm movie that would be as good or better than theirs
54. Xmen works why can't this
55. Are we just to disadvantaged with just Spider-Man's world when everyone else has a multitude of characters and comic books that inter act with each other
56. What kind is producing der would we pay them
57. Should we allow them to put am in other marvel movies
58. Does this just let the cat out of the bag
59. Could we co produce any other marvel movie or characters in exchange for this
60. How is it gonna feel when they go to comicon
61. How can we handle the press so it's good for us
I don't know the spin on this
62. What do we hunk out time table might be with drew pitching us and their casting needs
63. Is it just cap? Cap and one SPIDERMAN movie? Cap and ss and we ask them to help us with that
64. How can they guarantee us bo numbers when we are paying for the movie have approvals marketing and distributing ? It sounds insane
65. First he said one billion but that's not what the piece of paper said and if we did 850
We would make 160 anyway without his guarantee
66. Where did he get the 65 number from for our last movie
67. Where does the number of 275 come from is that what their movies really cost
68. What would the above the back ends on the movie be maybe barely anything at all
69. The offer of no producer fee seems to have disappeared
70. Do we have an obligation to all the producers writers and film makers we are working with?
71. How do we find out what the Russos are doing
72. Make the Russo deal immediately
73.if we do this we are gonna have to really talk about our going forward strategy ....
74. Sandler is at netflicks I think will is gona do sucide squad at WARNERS so that is gonnna feel weird
If spidey is gone too
And the few filmmakers we have focused on
Rian johnson belongs to star wars and Neal bloomcamp really belongs to Modi
and Roland is gonna do Id 4 and chris and Phil will never commit to us and Seth and evam made the deal with joe drake David Ayer is gone to WARNERS this is really a conversation we need to have
Big time
We gotta sign chris and Phil and the Russos
And I don't wanna lose drew cuz I think he is amazing even if this is a nutty situation
And maybe we can land chris nolan given josh and Jeff
But boy we really need to think about all this
I love our raid guy
But really who else are we gonna own cuz I think we better get serious

We gotta have a new big time strategy

We should really focus on this this week
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"