Homecoming Sony E-mails on wikileaks

FW: New Trailer - AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON

Date 2014-10-23 04:24:23
From rothman, tom
To pascal, amy
Look at all these….. If you insist on a trade for one of, eg, hulk, capt, black w, thor, for your guy, I believe you will get it.





From: Gray, Malcolm
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014 6:37 PM
To: Rothman, Tom; Beaubaire, David; Brown, Nicole
Cc: Villalta, Alex; Diemer, Seana; Shin, James
Subject: New Trailer - AVENGERS: AGE OF ULTRON



https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=tmeOjFno6Do
 
WOW. There is an insane amount of people viewing this thread right now (228).
Yeah... an insane amount from the outside. Probably all the Spidey fans who want to see the leaked emails and think this is the best place to view them. XD
 
Wilson Fisk

Hey. I'm ot next week. We can talk more but might be very tough w legendary. Lots of ex sony people and a competitor

Sent on the run
On Nov 3, 2014, at 6:56 PM, J
Steve,



Good evening sir.



Would you be interested in having breakfast next Friday November 14th at Kreation 7:00AM?



We wanted to pitch a scenario to you for the ‘Wilson Fisk’ (Spider-Man universe) scripted television project. We would like to talk to you about possibly taking a meeting with us over at Legendary Entertainment’s offices about ‘Wilson Fisk’ project and a possible joint production between Sony Pictures Television and Legendary, with us taking on writing duties. We actually met with Legendary about this project, but as we mentioned to you before Sony controls the character rights in television and film as we explained to our people over at Legendary. So in short we want and would need your (SPTV) participation. So we wanted to talk to you about it first to gauge your level of interest before we reach back out to our people at Legendary to schedule this proposed meeting. What do you think?? Great way to end 2014; ‘Sony Pictures Television and Legendary Entertainment to co-produced a new Marvel/ Spider-Man universe scripted series entitled ‘Wilson Fisk’; based on one of Marvel Universe’s most iconic villains and Jessica Drew aka Spider-Woman.



Actually, where we left our Legendary meeting was that one of our guys was planning to reach out to you to see if there was any joint production interest before they had additional meetings with us on this particular project. But Legendary seems genuinely interested. We also have another potential opportunity but we have held off on scheduling that meeting until we saw what if anything would/ could be generated on this project between Legendary and Sony. Let us know what you think.



Our ‘Wilson Fisk’ project wherever we potentially take it would need your participation because Sony holds television and film character rights for Spider-Man and his rogue gallery. We’re confident we can sell/ place this show with your participation. If not Legendary (meaning by some off chance SPTV and Legendary can’t come to agreeable terms) then somewhere else and this is an additional idea we’d like to discuss with you. We’re also well aware of the high expectations Sony places on all things Spider-Man related and we know this project will deliver in full and be an amazing television property for expanding Sony’s Spider-Man universe onto television in 2015. So there you have it.



Plus we haven’t all had a meal together in a minute, so I think we’re about due. Obviously if next Friday November 14th doesn’t work for your schedule just email us both a different date that works best for you. Sooner or later is fine with us as we know your schedule is extremely busy and hectic.



Have a great evening. We look forward to hearing back from you. Don’t forget to vote tomorrow.



"Don't be discouraged when they slam the door in your face. You have to keep going and follow your passion" -Steve Mosko



“You get in life what you have the courage to ask for.” - Oprah Winfrey
They were planning a Fisk TV show? Huh.
 
FW: any early pov on that question?

Date 2014-10-22 22:48:47
From steinberg, david
To weil, leah




From: Goldklang, Ira
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 1:24 PM
To: Gumpert, Andrew
Cc: Steinberg, David
Subject: RE: any early pov on that question?



Andrew – I have reviewed the agreement and would ideally have run my thoughts/theories by David (cc’d) prior to emailing you but if your need is for an early response, then I will provide my thoughts but hope that David can opine if need be.



In response to your question as to whether SPE could co-produce a picture with other Marvel characters my view is that while SPE is expressly prohibited from incorporating characters outside the Spider-Man universe in SPE’s pictures (including a complete Schedule 8 naming characters such as Hulk, Iron Man, etc), SPE may enter into a co-production agreement with a major studio (WB, Fox, Disney, Paramount, Universal, or DreamWorks). SPE may also enter into a co-production agreement with anyone else if the transaction is such that SPE has creative control and SPE initially controls all US distribution rights and will control, or have the right to obtain, distribution rights for the term of copyright.



That said - Marvel still has the right consult on drafts of screenplays and producers to be engaged, so Marvel would be involved/aware in a fairly early stage.



On concern query I would have is since SPE is prohibited from incorporating outside characters (2.e), would that mean SPE was in breach if SPE advertised the co-production containing such characters? However, at such a point, I have no doubt that Marvel would have become aware/involved in the process.



Main provisions are:



2.e. Characters Owned Exclusively By Marvel and Not Included in the Property. Notwithstanding any contrary provision hereof, the characters that are listed on Schedule 8 (such as Ben Urich and Cloak and Dagger) are, as between Marvel and SPE, the exclusive property of Marvel and not included in the Property, and SPE has no rights with respect to any such characters and Marvel may exploit such characters without restriction. The Parties agree that Schedule 8 is not an exhaustive list of characters not included in the Property and therefore reserved to Marvel, but is included for the sake of clarity with respect to the characters listed on Schedule 8. In addition and for the sake of clarity, no characters owned by Marvel or its Affiliates are included in the Property except for those characters that are expressly included in the Property pursuant Sections 2.b(i), 2.b(ii), 2.f(i) and 2.f(ii).

23. ASSIGNMENT.

23.a. SPE’s Right to Assign. Subject to Section 23.b hereof, SPE shall be free to assign or license any or all of its rights hereunder, and/or to delegate any or all of its duties, obligations and liabilities, at any time and from time to time, to any person or entity. Upon such assignment, SPE shall be released and discharged of and from the delegated duties, obligations and liabilities if such assignment and/or delegation is to: (i) a person or entity into which SPE merges or is consolidated; or (ii) a person or entity which acquires all or substantially all of SPE’s business and assets and which assumes such obligations in writing; or (iii) a financially responsible entity which is controlled by, under common control with, or controls SPE which assumes such obligations in writing; or (iv) a “Major Studio“ (i.e., and expressly defined as limited to: Warner Bros., Fox, Disney, Paramount, Universal, or DreamWorks) or United States television network, which assumes such obligations in writing. Any purported assignment by SPE in violation of this Section 23 shall be void ab initio.

23.b. Limitations. SPE may not assign this Agreement in its entirety except to (i) a person or entity into which SPE merges or is consolidated, or (ii) a person or entity which acquires all or substantially all of SPE’s business and assets and which assumes such obligations in writing, or (iii) a person or entity which is controlled by, under common control with, or controls SPE, or (iv) a Major Studio which assumes such obligations in writing. SPE may not assign its right to produce any Production to, or enter into a co-production agreement with, any entity except (i) any of the entities described in Section 23.b(i) - (iv) hereof, or (ii) in connection a transaction pursuant to which (A) SPE has creative control over the applicable Production, and (B) SPE initially controls all United States distribution rights with respect to the applicable Production and either controls or has the right to obtain (e.g., through the exercise of one or more options) such United States distribution rights for the entire term of copyright. Upon any assignment or delegation permitted under Section 23.b(i) - (iv) above, SPE shall be released and discharged of and from the delegated duties, obligations and liabilities.











From: Gumpert, Andrew
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 12:57 PM
To: Goldklang, Ira
Subject: any early pov on that question?



thx
 
Wow. So they were actually thinking about or contemplating the idea of Gwen Carnage and the idea that it would be "sexy" for her to fight Peter or a girl fight between her and MJ. This is hilarious. I just....I can't even....

Lol, they are just CRAZY! :woot:
No seriously, WT* were they thinking?! Poor Spidey ...

This video is so TRUE now:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cnOjvtDJkDQ
 
Re: Fwd: Re:
Date 2013-12-08 21:55:36
From
Re: Fwd: Re:
And lovely!

On Dec 8, 2013, at 4:54 PM, "Pascal, Amy" <wrote:

Exactly
I'm in love with him
The new north star

_____
From: Belgrad, Doug
To: Pascal, Amy
Cc: Minghella, Hannah; O'Connor, Rachel
Sent: Sun Dec 08 13:53:55 2013
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re:


He's great...reminds me of Koepp!

On Dec 8, 2013, at 4:48 PM, "Pascal, Amy" <£ wrote:

Just between us


Begin forwarded message:

From: Drew Goddard <>
Date: December 8, 2013, 3:51:44 PM EST
To: "Pascal, Amy" <

Okay!

Couple things:

Because we rapidly got into problem-solving mode last night, I didn't really get to praise some things that deserve proper praise:

-- First of all, Spider-Man is wonderful. In general, his vibe, and his tone, and his look, and his action is spot-on, and so much fun. As we move forward, let us never forget this simple axiom: when in doubt, put Spider-Man in the frame.

-- The Spider-Man montage that starts with him introducing himself to the boy is my second-favorite thing in the movie, and possibly the best depiction of the spirit of Spider-Man I've ever seen onscreen. Just delightful. (Also, on a related note, I absolutely love Spidey saying "Lick this" and smoothing Jaime's hair out. Also, Spidey's phone ringing and him web-shooting the wrench. And Spidey with the fireman's helmet. C'mon. Fantastic.)

-- My favorite thing in the movie is the way Marc did Gwen's death. So beautifully shot, and edited, and envisioned... everything from that shot of Spidey jumping up while she drops towards him to him holding her in his arms is a Spider-Man fan's dream... with the clocks and the timing and Andrew's performance... so beautiful, SO heartbreaking... It's the most important part of the movie with an incredibly high degree of difficulty, and Marc knocked it out of the park. So, so good.

-- And, again, as I said last night -- it's really the only thing that matters, it's what everyone is gonna remember, and it plays like gangbusters. So that's great.

Moving forward, I think the power of that moment provides an excellent blueprint for how to improve the movie. Because I feel like everything in the movie before that moment should be about setting up Gwen's death, and everything after should be about paying off Gwen's death. And that's it. But I'm getting ahead of myself.

So.

I do think, in situations like this, it's really easy to overthink and overanalyze solutions and deluge the filmmakers with way too much stuff, which isn't very helpful, so I'm gonna try to keep it simple. I think two things will really help this movie:

1.) Cutting twenty minutes out of it

2.) Clarifying (and maximizing) the Peter/Gwen story

I don't think those two things are mutually exclusive, otherwise I'd leave the first one out. Because all that matters is Peter/Gwen. So cutting things that are not about Peter/Gwen will make life easier.

In terms of how to attack that problem, it's a matter of looking at the Peter/Gwen story beats, and making sure they track. In the cut I saw last night, their story felt schizophrenic. In fairness, a lot of the MJ beats from the script addressed this issue, so there's a reason we're feeling this way. The MJ story was ultimately about Gwen (which was one of my favorite things about the script -- SO inspired) so of course losing MJ would have this affect. (Not that I'm arguing to put MJ back, it sounds like she didn't work at all, but from a story point of view she served an important function that may still need to be addressed.)

It sounds like there are some Peter/Gwen scenes that were left out, so it might be worth looking at them again and seeing if they help this problem. If they don't, though, and reshoots are on the table, it will probably be worth picking something up between them. Because I think part of why the ending isn't landing is because the setup isn't quite working.

Now, in terms of the solutions, I think there's a lot of value in what we discussed last night. My instinct is to let Marc and Alex and Matt digest everything and see what resonates. And then let's talk. If there's any way I can be helpful in the meantime, please holler. This movie is gonna be great!

Drew





On Dec 8, 2013, at 1:03 AM, Pascal, Amy <
 
Re: Food for thought...

I remember this email well.
You were right and that informed my thinking.
Sorry I didn't credit you in the room.



On May 19, 2014, at 1:37 PM, "Minghella, Hannah" <

Feeling the need to share this again so you know I've been thinking about where we need to go with the franchise for months. I'm really excited this is the way we're thinking about it now...


Begin forwarded message:

From: "Minghella, Hannah" <>
Date: May 19, 2014 at 1:25:58 PM PDT
To: "Minghella, Hannah" <m>
Subject: Fwd: Food for thought...




Begin forwarded message:

From: "Minghella, Hannah" <>
Date: November 3, 2013 at 2:01:45 PM PST
To: "Pascal, Amy" <>, "Belgrad, Doug, "Fineman, Eric" <
Subject: Food for thought...


Through all the recent marketing conversations about the trailer I've been doing a lot of thinking about the next Spider-Man movie. I know we all agree that we have to keep moving the franchise in a new direction and find new frontiers for our hero to explore. With that in mind I have two thoughts I wanted to share -

- one of the reasons it's hard to think of new visually iconic moments for Spidey is because we've made five movies in Manhattan. For as long as he's swinging down city streets, and under bridges, and down alley ways, and up skyscrapers, and through subway tunnels, there is always going to be a familiarity to the action. I genuinely believe that Oscorp is a global corporation with offices and secret research facilities all around the world and I think it's time we see Spidey in different and unique environments. I'm not suggesting the whole movie take place somewhere else but I'd love to see Spidey in another iconic city like Tokyo or Paris or London... or somewhere completely different like Istanbul or Monte Carlo... or out at a secret Oscorp compound in the dessert... or snow (picture that blue and red against a blanket of white). And how do those different environments interact with his powers? What happens when he's out at sea on a boat and can't swing away? Or in a jungle swinging through trees.

- also, in the last two movies the stakes have been deeply personal. While this is emotionally satisfying and the movies must always be personal, I feel that spidey's heroism is limited by the intentions of our villains. The plots have been somewhat insular and it's time to open it up. In the first movie a few people were infected by the Lizard's gas but the threat never felt that big. In this movie Electro threatens a black-out but despite two planes nearly colliding it's not clear what his intentions are beyond turning the lights off. One of the ways the Marvel and Batman movies get their scope is by having villains with agendas that go beyond the heroes themselves and have more serious implications for the world at
 
Re: Meeting

Beautiful. We&#8217;ll do it in a couple weeks. Meantime, ready to start rolling on Sinister Six! (I&#8217;e been assuming everyone&#8217;s in Spidey 2 land so haven&#8217;t been pushing. But let&#8217;s get into it asap.)


On Feb 21, 2014, at 2:58 PM, Pascal, Amy <> wrote:

> I'm great
> You tell me when is good
> In your hands
> Why can't we start writing sinister six
> What's happening at fox
> Spidey is beautiful
>
>> On Feb 21, 2014, at 2:56 PM, "Drew Goddard" <> wrote:
>>
>> Amy!
>>
>> Caroline and I have been rocking on the story for Rob 5000 (which is the working title for our crazy movie.) But we&#8217;re not quite at &#8220;pitch the story&#8221; phase yet. I know we&#8217;re supposed to sit down next week, but I don&#8217;t want to waste your time. Should we postpone until we&#8217;ve got something with a little more meat on the bones?

>>
>> (Also, hi! How are you? How&#8217;s life? How&#8217;s Spidey?)
>>
>> Drew
 
Re:

Date 2014-09-02 05:12:27
From minghella, hannah
To pascal, amy
Me too...They are super busy on their TV show until October but Phil will start exploring Spidey with Justin now. I'll meet with this guy. And then I think we have a follow-up dinner in October once they're done with the show...
From: Pascal, AmySent: Monday, September 1, 2014 10:10 PMTo: Minghella, HannahSubject: Re:
yes makes me happy
On Sep 1, 2014, at 10:10 PM, "Minghella, Hannah" <m> wrote:

Or is that not what you were talking about?
From: Minghella, HannahSent: Monday, September 1, 2014 10:08 PMTo: Pascal, AmySubject: Re:
A great exec they would want to work with...
From: Pascal, AmySent: Monday, September 1, 2014 10:07 PMTo: Minghella, HannahSubject: Re:
be able to get ???/meaning?
On Sep 1, 2014, at 10:04 PM, "Minghella, Hannah" <> wrote:

Yes. Talked to Phil today. He wants to start Justin on doing art work for Spidey. I'll get into that with Pam tomorrow. Also, he's setting a meeting for me with someone he thinks is great that we might be able to get...
From: Pascal, AmySent: Monday, September 1, 2014 9:58 PMTo: Minghella, HannahSubject:
TIME TO GET BACK INTO THE CHRIS AND PHIL STUFF
 
AMS3
Hi Amy,

Further to our brief chat during tonight's closing night party, below are my suggestions for small changes I feel could add a chuckle or two to an already wonderful film.

a) At the end of the initial chase scene where Spidey delivers to police the two bad guys hanging upside down from his web and we're police say "put up your hands" they could instead say "put up your hands... I mean put down your hands ....etc. etc."

b) In scene where Spidey catches the flying taxicab and saves the policeman's life, instead of saying "can I give you a hand" he could perhaps say something like "can I give you a lift"

Thanks for indulging my creative side.
Regards,
Ralph

Sent from my iPad
 
so of course losing MJ would have this affect. (Not that I'm arguing to put MJ back, it sounds like she didn't work at all

That Shailene shade.
 
Subject: ASM2 Focus Group Recap

Hi all,
Here is an overview of the Spider-Man groups this evening in Boston.
AMAZING SPIDER-MAN 2 came up unaided in two of the three groups, with only females 20-29 needing prompting.
In all three groups, final interest levels outpaced interest based on individual spots (only Glory in the third group matched their final tally of 9 definite interest). That said, final interest was nearly universal, with 8-9 definite and the rest probable. This is a clear indication that enthusiasm for the film comes from multiple looks rather than just one positioning. This is also consistent with the findings from the groups last week.


The following spots stood out as candidates for the campaign:

Everything Changes. This spot was the clear standout of the night - it reached the highest levels of definite interest in both the first and third groups, and was the second most-popular spot in the second group. Viewers liked that it gave you more information about Electro, but also had a balance between Electro and Green Goblin. It also introduced the villains but then pivoted to the personal stakes for Spider-Man, which women in particular were interested in. Many viewers specifically cited the copy here as memorable, and viewers felt it provided enough background without giving too much away. Greatest. This spot was shown in groups 1 and 3 and was well-received in both. This spot made the villains themselves feel like a serious threat, especially with the "enemies unite" copy that was called out in both groups as a strong positive. Promise. The success of Promise mirrored its success in testing quite closely: viewers did not believe Gwen died in the spot - and in fact about half of the viewers believed there was no way Gwen would die in the movie - but they liked the suspenseful presentation anyway. This spot was strong with the first and second groups (the latter of which has a caveat below) but the third group felt it was still too much about Gwen in the beginning. Glory and New Era performed well. Glory was strong in the last group, where viewers saw it first and were excited by the action, but the first group had a slight preference for New Era, which felt darker (in a good way).
The following spots were less successful:

Friends/Enemies. This spot was shown in the first and third groups and had moderate success with little enthusiasm. Viewers were much less interested in Harry's story, either because it made the movie feel small, as one viewer put it in the third group, or because they have already seen Green Goblin in the first iteration of Spider-Man, as one viewer said in the first group. In general, viewers were most interested in Electro in terms of the villains, and while all three groups were clear that they want it to be a combo package, this emphasis on Green Goblin was less engaging. Everything Gwen-heavy. Heart and Chemistry played up the banter between Gwen and Peter, and both spots failed to generate enthusiasm in the female group, which was generally looking for the same things the males were looking for: action, villains, and an engaging story. Emma also fell short with this group, as they felt that she was distracting and even for a few viewers "pushy." Interestingly, after a string of Gwen-heavy spots, Promise played very well to this group, who felt like the spot pivoted away from making the love angle exclusively about Gwen and more about family and affection in general. Still, the best spot for this group from an interest perspective was Greatest F, which did include a little of the romantic element - they liked that it showed that Gwen wants to help without being too aggressive. Clearly, for these females, a little went a long way.
Initial thoughts moving forward:

Suspense continues to dominate. Viewers like seeing big moments like Gwen and Spidey crashing through the window, but they also like seeing Spidey put to the test by multiple villains with a hidden agenda. The Oscorp/family history element remains a strong way to combine the villains and give viewers a sense of the elevated stakes.
Electro deserves a spot. While people don't want to see just Electro, viewers were interested enough in seeing more of Jamie Foxx as Electro that developing something focused on this character is recommended. Ideally, this spot would feature plenty of the eye-catching special effects surrounding Electro - which were popular in all three groups tonight - and still feature some of the other villains and Spidey for balance. Addi
 
Re:

Easy to fix all of this. It will be great!

On Jan 27, 2014, at 10:37 PM, "Pascal, Amy" <> wrote:

> yes
>
>> On Jan 27, 2014, at 10:34 PM, "Vollack, Lia" <> wrote:
>>
>> I think especially at the end in the power plant. We need more fun in their fight. Spidey is winning there. And this Times Square went too far. The earlier one was better. We can fix a lot with the mix too.

>> And we need uplift at the end of the movie.
>>> On Jan 27, 2014, at 10:23 PM, "Pascal, Amy" <> wrote:
>>>
>>> toobmuch Electro score And not enough spidey
>>>
>>>> On Jan 27, 2014, at 10:06 PM, "Vollack, Lia" < wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I mean the version from the earlier screening. Not the screening we just had.
>>>> Sorry if I was unclear.
 
FW: f/u from meeting

Your call



From: Solmon, Vicki
Sent: Monday, June 09, 2014 2:37 PM
To: Weil, Leah
Cc: Fukunaga, John; Wolfson, Aimee
Subject: RE: f/u from meeting



A status report : the only remaining binders are the Domestic and International Business Practices which also include Complaint letters. I have been working on these for weeks. Previously, you had offered paralegal help; I would like to accept your offer but only for later in the week . When I have finished reviewing every electronic folder&#8217;s emails and printing from the remaining folders, we will need assistance indexing those binders. Please let me know if this works for you. Thanks in advance.



From: Solmon, Vicki
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 6:37 PM
To: Weil, Leah
Cc: Fukunaga, John; Wolfson, Aimee
Subject: RE: f/u from meeting



I have not forgotten that I owe you an estimate today ; here is it is.



Realistically, the entire project will take 6-8 weeks; a rolling production is still an option. I am out one week in May. I did some research over the weekend and found out that the source I had hoped for regarding the MLAs does not have them; thus, I will have to start from scratch. However, I have begun the groundwork on each different category already. I know you offered help but first I have to research the most efficient way to gather the documents; I then will come back to you regarding the paralegal support.



Moreover, as you know my current priority is Spidey . Since Sean&#8217;s is very busy now on the EU project, I am doing more now on Content Protection than just Spidey which was the original plan.



I know this is longer that you would have wished but it is realistic; I do hope that I can turn it around in a shorter timeframe.





From: Weil, Leah
Sent: Monday, April 21, 2014 6:12 PM
To: Solmon, Vicki
Cc: Fukunaga, John; Wolfson, Aimee
Subject: RE: f/u from meeting



Following up&#8230;.



From: Solmon, Vicki
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 6:47 PM
To: Weil, Leah
Cc: Fukunaga, John; Wolfson, Aimee
Subject: RE: f/u from meeting



I will give you my estimate on Monday after I think about it over the weekend. I have begun (and nearly completed number 4 already). However, these items do not exist in this format currently. I appreciate your offer of litigation paralegals and/or outside help very much and will get back to you once I am further into my production.



Have a good weekend.

From: Weil, Leah
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2014 5:18 PM
To: Solmon, Vicki
Cc: Fukunaga, John; Wolfson, Aimee
Subject: f/u from meeting



Vicki &#8211; I thought it might be useful to send a quick note about the follow up from yesterday&#8217;s meeting to make sure we are all &#8220;on the same page&#8221;. My notes indicate that you will be pulling together the following documents and/or binders of documents that can be turned over to John&#8217;s team:



1. Copies of all (domestic and international) current MLAs and samples of booking agreement/confirmations

2. Consent decrees and related case law, memos and/or tutorials

3. Form letters used for customer complaints/clearance issues

4. Anti-blind bid statutes and/or memos

5. Any other memos and/or tutorial information done for clients relating to territories or requirements that are unique and/or exceptions to general way that films are screened or distributed (for example, the Quebec requirements)



As we discussed if you need help from litigation paralegals and/or outside help to pull this together, please let me know. I recognize that the focus of your attention in the immediate future is on the Spiderman release but it would be great if you could let me know by Monday how long it might take to get this together. I don&#8217;t want to have an unrealistic time deadline but do want to make sure that we are moving forward with the transition in an expeditious manner.



Obviously there will be other meetings and conversations with John&#8217;s team &#8211; I leave that to John to determine how best to coordinate.



Thanks!
 
Re: Sony Expects $2 Billion Loss for Fiscal Year | Variety

Date 2014-09-17 14:23:41
From tolmach, matthew
To pascal, amy
Spidey's actually a big part of the reason for the last paragraph! People in this town -- esp the types who reply to articles (have u ever met ANYONE who does??) -- are myopic and...sucky.

On Sep 17, 2014, at 7:21 AM, "Pascal, Amy" wrote:

Exactly

> On Sep 17, 2014, at 7:21 AM, "Tolmach, Matthew" wrote:
>
> Cuz spidey made all those dumb phones...
> So inane.
> Ignore!!!!!!
>
> On Sep 17, 2014, at 7:18 AM, "Pascal, Amy" wrote:
>
> Check comments
>
>> On Sep 17, 2014, at 7:17 AM, "Tolmach, Matthew" wrote:
>>
>> Oy. But pictures is the good story, at least...
>>
>> On Sep 17, 2014, at 7:15 AM, "Pascal, Amy" wrote:
>>
>> So annoying
>> http://variety.com/2014/biz/news/sony-expects-2-billion-loss-for-fiscal-year-1201307413/
 
Re:

Date 2014-11-11 07:05:02
From jr
To pascal, amy
I wouldn't do a toned down version of spider. It needs the scale!

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 10, 2014, at 11:03 PM, Pascal, Amy wrote:
>
> Come again ...Marty version tricky (but exciting and probably never happen)
>
> Jump street good I agree
>
> What was the spidey take you would not do? I like your opinion
>
> Sue asked to have dinner she is miserable
>
> Sent from my Sony Xperia Z2
>
>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 11:01 PM, Jeff Robinov wrote:
>>
>> Nothing's really changed in last Year and a half. Everyone powers thru there own agenda and tries to force the move to you or take it away..
>>
>> Been a crazy month after having been out of it.
>>
>> I dont really understand a lot of what people are buying.
>>
>> Sitting with these young execs is really interesting.
>>
>> They're movie frame of reference is 10 yrs old...
>>
>> All we can do is go with what we understand.
>>
>> Long winded way of saying that I wouldn't go that direction with Spider-Man.
>>
>> The Marty version of cleopatra feels really tricky also.
>>
>> I like the direction for jump street a lot.
>>
>> But just my opinion.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 10:54 PM, Pascal, Amy wrote:
>>>
>>> Well they met in my
>>> Sounds like it went great
>>> Eric rewriting
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my Sony Xperia Z2
>>>
>>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 10:40 PM, Jeff Robinov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Cleopatra.
>>>>
>>>> Marty committing?
 
Re:
We all saw a cut down yesterday that really worked.
It had all the main key story components and spidey swagger too, ending on the huge set piece action sequences.


----- Original Message -----
From: Pascal, Amy
To:
Sent: Tue Feb 25 23:26:30 2014
Subject:

How are cap materials going? Do we think we can come up with some thing that moves the needle internationally
I. The various territories that need it

Is it possible to have a cut down of event of not
 
Re:

Date 2014-10-26 02:27:59
From pascal, amy
To belgrad, doug
yes
spidey
On Oct 25, 2014, at 7:07 PM, Belgrad, Doug wrote:

> About spidey or about it all?
> Off to Halloween party.
>
>> On Oct 25, 2014, at 7:03 PM, "Pascal, Amy" wrote:
>>
>> Bernie says I'm being ridiculous
>>
 
Re:

Andrew is becoming him

On Jan 24, 2014, at 6:56 PM, "Pascal, Amy" <
We made a movie worthy of him
I love Andrew again

> On Jan 24, 2014, at 6:55 PM, "Tolmach, Matthew" <.com> wrote:
>
> He's our boy
>
> On Jan 24, 2014, at 6:54 PM, "Pascal, Amy" <ny.com> wrote:
>
> Feels like old times
> Like winning with greatness
> No other movie no matter how excellent makes me feel
> The way SPIDEY does
> I think I'm crying again
> A
>
>> On Jan 24, 2014, at 6:52 PM, "Tolmach, Matthew" <ony.com> wrote:
>>
>> As freak outs go, that's a ****ing good one!!!
>> How good does this feel?????
>> Xo
>>
>> On Jan 24, 2014, at 6:47 PM, "Pascal, Amy" <ny.com> wrote:
>>
>> I'm freaking out
>> I'm seriously happier than I've been in years
>> A
 
These leaks just make me dislike Film Reporters more... I mean, sure they may be why we got Spidey in the MCU, from leaking false rumors, but it may also be why we wont likely get deadpool anytime soon:
John Turitzin (Marvel) writing to Bob Cohen (Fox)
I&#8217;m writing to you to correct the misimpression left by reporting concerning Fox&#8217;s plans for a Deadpool motion picture. According to a September 18, 2014 report in Variety, &#8220;Fox and Marvel have slotted Deadpool, their long in development X-Men spin-off for Feb. 12, 2016.&#8221; (http://variety.com/2014/film/news/deadpool-release-date-fox-marvel-1201308783/). As you are aware, Marvel has no involvement in the decision to produce a Deadpool film, let alone when that film will be released. The article continues with the falsehood that Kevin Feige is producing the film with Lauren Schuler Donner. Kevin Feige will have no involvement in a Deadpool motion picture, should Fox decide to produce one, and we will not be designating Kevin as an executive producer for any of the films made under the X-Men license (unless we advise you otherwise). We are, however, designating Stan Lee as our executive producer for the upcoming X-Men films of which we are aware are in production (i.e., Deadpool and X-Men: Apocalypse). Additionally, Tom Cohen who was designated as Associate Producer should be removed from any credits.
We can&#8217;t determine, of course, the extent to which that misimpression was created or fostered by Fox, but please ask your people to be careful not to imply that Marvel Studios or its personnel are producing any of the X-Men films licensed to Fox by Marvel and to correct any reports that suggest otherwise. Misrepresentations in press reports lead to inaccurate speculation that there could be cross-overs between Marvel Studios produced movies and those produced under license by Fox.
Just goes to show, some things these guys say are straight up lies. Even when they may get it right, they likely were just lucky, or got a small bit of info and exaggerated it to make a whole story.
BTW:
Here's a great article to sum up what we know from the leaks.
 
Re:

Date 2014-11-11 07:05:02
From jr
To pascal, amy
I wouldn't do a toned down version of spider. It needs the scale!

Sent from my iPhone

> On Nov 10, 2014, at 11:03 PM, Pascal, Amy wrote:
>
> Come again ...Marty version tricky (but exciting and probably never happen)
>
> Jump street good I agree
>
> What was the spidey take you would not do? I like your opinion
>
> Sue asked to have dinner she is miserable
>
> Sent from my Sony Xperia Z2
>
>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 11:01 PM, Jeff Robinov wrote:
>>
>> Nothing's really changed in last Year and a half. Everyone powers thru there own agenda and tries to force the move to you or take it away..
>>
>> Been a crazy month after having been out of it.
>>
>> I dont really understand a lot of what people are buying.
>>
>> Sitting with these young execs is really interesting.
>>
>> They're movie frame of reference is 10 yrs old...
>>
>> All we can do is go with what we understand.
>>
>> Long winded way of saying that I wouldn't go that direction with Spider-Man.
>>
>> The Marty version of cleopatra feels really tricky also.
>>
>> I like the direction for jump street a lot.
>>
>> But just my opinion.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 10:54 PM, Pascal, Amy wrote:
>>>
>>> Well they met in my
>>> Sounds like it went great
>>> Eric rewriting
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my Sony Xperia Z2
>>>
>>>> On Nov 10, 2014, at 10:40 PM, Jeff Robinov wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Cleopatra.
>>>>
>>>> Marty committing?


LOL.

Jeff Robinov didn't want Spider-Man to go back to Marvel. Here's a guy that truly believes that EVERY superhero film should be Nolanified. Everything dark, starting with an older Peter and Kraven Last Hunt. Sony higher ups are CLEARLY not listening to the right people at that point. Here's hoping that the Mighty Feige can make a sense out of this mess.
 
Re: RISE OF ELECTRO title

That's what I was afraid of

On Nov 20, 2013, at 6:38 PM, "Blake, Jeff" <> wrote:

Crap . Will re-group tomorrow .

_____
From: IP <@marvel.com>
To: Blake, Jeff
Sent: Wed Nov 20 18:25:22 2013
Subject: RE: RISE OF ELECTRO title

Jeff,



You asked us back on October 3rd &#8211; This was no good.



This title is tired out and it's very cliché. Too many movies start with &#8220;Rise of&#8221;.



Thanks,



Ike
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,480
Messages
22,115,754
Members
45,907
Latest member
DrJonathanCrane
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"