Spooderman
Civilian
- Joined
- Jan 17, 2014
- Messages
- 680
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 11
People have theorized that the symbiote is in that bottle in that container.
Scott Mendelson said:Sony Pictures already has enough healthy properties (Spider-Man, 007, Resident Evil, its animated properties, the seemingly surefire Goosebumps adaptations, and its comedy star vehicles) to survive and even thrive as they foster new franchises, attempt to reboot older ones (Men In Black, Ghostbusters, Charlie’s Angels, etc.), take some financial hits, and occasionally distribute “real” films like Captain Phillips or Looper. A film slate built on the overexposure of Spider-Man will do little more than to to kill audience interest in the web-slinger while leaving the studio with that much less money and release date real estate to foster other would-be franchises for the future. Point being, Sony had a bad summer. It happens. As you recall, they had a terrible summer 1996 (The Fan, Multiplicity, The Cable Guy, etc.) only to roar back to life in 1997 with My Best Friend’s Wedding, Men In Black, and Air Force One. The worst thing Sony can do is panic and just overload on the one surefire property they own while ignoring their very real successes.
I think Sony should try and do something big with Men in Black. If they got better writers to work on it, they could do something special with it.
As far as Spider-Man goes, I don't think Sony is actually going to release a Spider-Man film each year. You'll have spin-offs coming out in between Spider-Man movies, which can come out every 2-3 years. Compare it to the Avengers: for 3 years, you have movies like Iron Man, Thor, or Captain America being released, all leading up to The Avengers, which are also released every 3 years.
Venom can appeal to a wide audience, and I can see him pulling off a few films if done right. The Sinister Six is going to be pretty big, so there's no telling what they can pull off with that.
And just because characters aren't popular doesn't mean they can't do well on film. With that logic, I guess Marvel shouldn't be making movies for Thor, GOTG, Captain America, or Ant-Man, right?
Any of these characters can be made into good movies. It'll be tricky no doubt, but I think it can be done. I don't see why they aren't "important enough" to get their own movies.