Far From Home Spider-Man: Far From Home General Discussion and Speculation - Part 1

Status
Not open for further replies.
Spidey news incoming? https://***********/Borys_Kit/status/1012047437383340032?s=19

Not Far From Home related :csad:
 
I think it should be called ‘Spider-Man: home if you want to. Home around the world”

On a serious note though, feige said the name had a double meaning. I reckon this will be the movie that officially moves peter out of the mcu and into the Sony verse

Huh? What's your reasoning behind this thought?
 
Lol what makes you think it would move peter into the Sony verse? A universe that’s almost dead on arrival? Yea let’s move Spider-Man away from the mcu again and make bad movies and alienate the GA. Not happening.
 
Both sides are making money off this current deal. I don't understand interpreting the title in a way that suggests Feige is ending the Sony deal.
 
Well, logically speaking, it would be a stupid movie but we gotta remember the original deal does end with this second solo movie. It was going to be 5 movies, right? And now this Far from Home would be the 5th movie of that deal.
 
Well, logically speaking, it would be a stupid movie but we gotta remember the original deal does end with this second solo movie. It was going to be 5 movies, right? And now this Far from Home would be the 5th movie of that deal.

Even so, there's still no logical reason for either party to withdraw. Both of them are making money off this, and they'll find any way to make sure that still happens.
 
Holland spidey is big right now. they'd be stupid to mess it up.
 
You want Peter to sing "Food glorious food" at the start of the movie?

Absolutely. I want that from every marvel film.

Except the next avengers flick because half the orchestra is missing :csad:
 
Even so, there's still no logical reason for either party to withdraw. Both of them are making money off this, and they'll find any way to make sure that still happens.

I don't think anyone has accused Sony of being logical.
 
Assuming the double-meaning truly is related to property rights, it could simply imply that Spider-Man and associated characters are "far from home" since Sony still does have control over the film rights. Side note, I kind of miss the days when Spider-Man titles didn't imply anything regarding studio negotiations.
 
Assuming the double-meaning truly is related to property rights, it could simply imply that Spider-Man and associated characters are "far from home" since Sony still does have control over the film rights. Side note, I kind of miss the days when Spider-Man titles didn't imply anything regarding studio negotiations.

That's what i've suggested before. Not that Spidey might be withdrawn from the MCU, but that he's still not quite home at Marvel yet. Still far from home. It may not be anything more than a little dig at Sony, on top of all the other meanings. Sony wouldn't read it that way, but maybe only Marvel would internally, but would never admit to it publicly.
 
That's what i've suggested before. Not that Spidey might be withdrawn from the MCU, but that he's still not quite home at Marvel yet. Still far from home. It may not be anything more than a little dig at Sony, on top of all the other meanings. Sony wouldn't read it that way, but maybe only Marvel would internally, but would never admit to it publicly.
Yeah, I agree.

Spiderman 3 = Spiderman: Direct to Home :p
Or maybe... Spider-Man: Home Front (if the rights battle continues) or Spider-Man: Home Sweet Home (if Marvel gets the rights back).
 
If Spider-Man was removed from the MCU, I think I would just lose so much interest in Spider-Man films, and my excitement for the MCU in general would lower.

At the very least, I want to get a solid trilogy out of Tom Holland's Spider-Man.
 
I want them to stop making him the Barry Allen of the current TV show for MCU, not caring for his secret identity like he normally should and unmasking in front of everybody.
 
So does Spider-Man visit Strange at the London Sanctum?

If this takes place after Avengers 4 then I guess it is possible for Spidey to visit the London Sanctum. Spidey and Strange met for the first time in Infinity War so if the film is set before that then them running into each other is unlikely.

I actually like the idea of different Marvel superheroes having extended cameos/supporting roles in Spidey movies. Iron Man in Homecoming, perhaps Doctor Strange in Far From Home. Another hero in the third Spidey MCU solo flick.
 
When do you think they would start making negotiations for more films beyond "Far From Home"? I don't think they would wait too long after the movie is released.

Knowing Sony, if a third film DOES happen, I imagine they would want to announce it right before or right after the release of "Far From Home."

If a third movie doesn't happen, I wonder if they will keep Holland's Spider-Man for their spin-off movies, or just reboot again (which would really hit the franchise hard).

Whatever happens, it is certainly clear that Sony is testing the waters in many ways: they have the Venom spin-off, an animated film, and a mainstream Spider-Man series in the MCU. I think an animated film series can co-exist with the MCU Spider-Man, but a live action spin-off series might be confusing and could potentially conflict with the MCU Spidey. Maybe I have no clue as to what I am talking about so correct me if I am wrong.
 
"Far From Home" = Far away from what you know. Far away from what you're familiar with. Outside of your comfort zone.

The events of IW/Avengers 4 will profoundly shake up the status quo of Peter's life, and he'll have to figure out where to go from there. There's your double meaning for the title.
 
Last edited:
"Far From Home" = Far away from what you know. Far away from what you're familiar with. Outside of your comfort zone.

The events of IW/Avengers 4 will profoundly shake up the status quo of Peter's life, and he'll have to figure out where to go from there. There's your double meaning for the title.
This guy's got it.
 
It’s a great song

:awesome:

So in other words you have nothing but personal conjecture to back up up your statement about the current state of the Sony deal or the idea that somehow the title of the film is a reference on Feige's part to moving Spidey out of the MCU.

Just so we are clear, because I don't know how else to interpret your dancing around the obvious.
 
Settle down Krypton, these are comic book forums. We’re meant to have fun

Anyway, the original point came from the initial deal between Sony and Disney

http://collider.com/spider-man-marvel-sony-deal-explained/#mcu
they get to use Tom Holland’s Peter Parker in a set number of MCU movies (five in total, per this initial agreement, including Homecoming and its sequel).
alleging that marvel would help reboot spidey and then Sony would take it from there. They still own the character really. Marvel never bought him off them. That’s all
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"