Herr Logan
Avenger
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2004
- Messages
- 12,393
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
DACrowe said:I also would like to say organic webbing....I think it works better for the movies, not because it was in the movies but selling that an 18 year-old made them with no money is....well I just think organic webbing would save time and logic for a film. Then again I am being biased as at the same time I would like the costume (though I am not a director or costume designer so my say would be nigh) to look cool. Raised webbing or not I don't want it to be done with a magic marker. I know he reality he would but it just would be so cheesy if for 4 out of 5 films (or in the real franchise, 2 out of 3) for him to be wearing something that looks like would be in the bargain bin of costumes at Target.
Do not ever make statements like these in any Safe Haven thread again. This argument has been made countless times in countless threads and is unequivocally in opposition to the concept of "faithfulness." You are not allowed to make the argument that Spider-Man has not possessed mechanical webshooters for the majority of his existence in various media, since that is a lie and an insult on those who know better. Therefore, mechanical webshooters must be deemed faithful, and you have written off that aspect of the mythos. That is not allowed in here, period. No discussion, no argument, just acknowledge and act accordingly.
It is a valid point to raise about the costume meshing with the web-shooters, but getting rid of the web-shooters is never the right solution if it is to be a faithful.
The only way I would even consider tolerating this (and that may never be the case anyway) is if you had devoted an even larger amount of text to truly criticizing something signficant in the Spider-Man movies (visual/audio gags don't cut it... not nearly), and I don't see that. Granted, I haven't the focus needed to carefully read your entire story layout, and I will do so as soon as I'm up to it.
Anyway, bottom line, you will minimize-- if not leave out completely-- all statements that describe long-standing elements of the source material as "cheesy," "unrealistic," and so forth. That's not a request. We have clearance to be here and be free of such offensive propaganda in this and all other Safe Haven threads.
Do not bother criticizing me or this thread simply because you don't adhere to its philosophy, as that is trolling and I haven't made any personal attacks on you yet. I apologize to everyone if this sounds unreasonable, but I've been given ample reason by several posters to be more defensive and less open to the whims of those who don't "get it." It's Zero Tolerance, kids. Love it or leave it. You say "faithful" is a subjective term? Sure is, but we're not debating it here. Read the rules again and pay close attention to the part that says "you either belong here or you don't." This is the "uncool kids" table. If that's not your kind of scene, go eat lunch with the "cool kids."
DACrowe, I honestly do appreciate the time you put into the rest of your post and will review it soon-- barring any other conflicts that come up between us in the meantime.