Suicide Squad: General Discussion and Speculation - Part 8

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remember 30 minutes ago when I joked that Aidan Gillen was spotted on set? People believe it...

https://***********/dcumoviepage/status/600416897641877505

It amazes me how incredibly dense some people can be.

Still pretty hilarious though
 
Remember 30 minutes ago when I joked that Aidan Gillen was spotted on set? People believe it...

https://***********/dcumoviepage/status/600416897641877505

1245.gif
 
they sure are... they are crazy *****ebags as joker and harley are.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cA7LT6ghMUU

listen what Schnepp and guys have to say about Joker.

I don't know how much Schnepp is actually in the know but he said George Miller is being courted by WB at the end of the video. Said first it was for JL (doesn't make sense) than cleared it up by saying it was for a DC cinematic universe film.
 
Somebody else's photos? :huh: Their your photos

That's what i find it unethical and even creepy at some point.In my opinion subject on photo should matter even in public places. Even if laws regard that fact, it's still wrong.

In that case, you can go to public beach, take photos of women in bikini (or maybe even topless) and claim it's my work and i can sell it. You can make profit out of somebody else and they don't have any rights? Actually i have seen an article 61 man took 13 year old girl's upskirt photo in Portland and laws couldn't do anything because she is in public place and wears underwear. WTF?!

In this case, you can make money out of somebody else's work. Nobody would look this low quality photos if it wasn't for upcoming movie which is not even finished. (Might have negative effect on movie) I think any photo about Suicide Squad comes out of WB should be illegal. That's not freedom, that's abusing it.
 
I don't know how much Schnepp is actually in the know but he said George Miller is being courted by WB at the end of the video. Said first it was for JL (doesn't make sense) than cleared it up by saying it was for a DC cinematic universe film.

I wouldn't be surprised, but the only "involvement" Miller has had for this universe so far is he was spotted on the set of Suicide Squad and I think that's really because Miller's friend/stunt coordinator for Mad Max: Fury Road, Guy Norris, is the stunt coordinator for this movie.
 
Remember 30 minutes ago when I joked that Aidan Gillen was spotted on set? People believe it...

https://***********/dcumoviepage/status/600416897641877505
So you were joking? :argh: You forgot the :o :(
 
In this case, you can make money out of somebody else's work. Nobody would look this low quality photos if it wasn't for upcoming movie which is not even finished. (Might have negative effect on movie) I think any photo about Suicide Squad comes out of WB should be illegal. That's not freedom, that's abusing it.

So why are you looking at them if it's unethical?
 
I'll reserve my judge on the tats till I see the movie. For now I'll just pretend they don't have any context. The rest looks great.
 
That's what i find it unethical and even creepy at some point.In my opinion subject on photo should matter even in public places. Even if laws regard that fact, it's still wrong.

In that case, you can go to public beach, take photos of women in bikini (or maybe even topless) and claim it's my work and i can sell it. You can make profit out of somebody else and they don't have any rights? Actually i have seen an article 61 man took 13 year old girl's upskirt photo in Portland and laws couldn't do anything because she is in public place and wears underwear. WTF?!

In this case, you can make money out of somebody else's work. Nobody would look this low quality photos if it wasn't for upcoming movie which is not even finished. (Might have negative effect on movie) I think any photo about Suicide Squad comes out of WB should be illegal. That's not freedom, that's abusing it.

A few bad stories do not out weigh the HUGE benefit to laws like these. You say that it is still wrong, but you have no idea about the thousands of photographers who obey common decency and take advantage of these rules. You can cheery pick the bad stories all you want but these laws are beneficial. I use them at work, video or photography I doesn't matter because my work is protected. They make sense in the macro, and their may be a few bad eggs out there but it does not change the fact these laws are for the betterment of everyone regardless of how you feel.
 
back to Suicide Squad,

I guess if the public outcry is harsh enough they could remove the damaged tattoo in post. I doubt they would but the definitely could.
 
So what is everyone thinking? that the plane crash allowed some bad guys to escape into the city and the squad + military go after them?
 
Military crash, Scott Eastwood, Hal Jordan confirmed hheheheheh
 
A few bad stories do not out weigh the HUGE benefit to laws like these. You say that it is still wrong, but you have no idea about the thousands of photographers who obey common decency and take advantage of these rules. You can cheery pick the bad stories all you want but these laws are beneficial. I use them at work, video or photography I doesn't matter because my work is protected. They make sense in the macro, and their may be a few bad eggs out there but it does not change the fact these laws are for the betterment of everyone regardless of how you feel.

It's not like i'm going to make a war against laws. What's wrong and what's illegal doesn't mean same though.
 
Yeah I'm catching all this.. but have you seen this?

https://***********/Nerdcasted/status/600378509014470656/photo/1
 
It's not like i'm going to make a war against laws. What's wrong and what's illegal doesn't mean same though.

But there is nothing wrong with the laws in the first place. They do way more good than harm. That guy in Portland was caught, they couldn't charge him but everyone knows who he is. That's one example where someone abused the law but what about the thousands of situations where this law has helped catch a criminal. Do you think private business could have street facing surveillance cameras without this protection? What about people photographing police brutality or a riot. I caught a hit and run a couple years ago and the lady driving the car couldn't sue me for taking her image because I was protected. I do work with the RED cameras, and every single time I take it out to grab a shot for work someone is in frame, sometimes hundreds of people. I'm shooting 5K and I can't ask every person their for permission, I wouldn't be able to do my job.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,301
Messages
22,082,545
Members
45,883
Latest member
Smotonri
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"