Superman in 3D

as a guy who already wears glasses 3D is a burden for me...but I loved Avatar in 3D...and the DVD is just as good in 2D...so I'm torn
 
I'm not a fan of 3D so I'd rather it wasn't shot in 3D
 
I'm not a fan of 3D so I'd rather it wasn't shot in 3D

Why, if the 2D version ends up looking exactly the same? :huh:

Which would be a worse scenario-- they shoot the film in 3D, and you buy tickets for the 2D version, or they shoot it in 2D, it ends up looking exactly the same, and then the movie ends up having to carry the stigma of having an underwhelming 3D conversion?
 
Ya they need to shoot it in 3D cause if they don't, somewhere down the road it's going to get converted anyways. I'm pretty sure I'll see the film in 2D first to get all the rich colors. Then I'll see it in 3D just for kicks and to trip to f out.
 
Why, if the 2D version ends up looking exactly the same? :huh:

Which would be a worse scenario-- they shoot the film in 3D, and you buy tickets for the 2D version, or they shoot it in 2D, it ends up looking exactly the same, and then the movie ends up having to carry the stigma of having an underwhelming 3D conversion?

If it doesn't effect it then fine by me
 
I don't really care. The only 3D films I bothered to watch was Toy Story 1 and 2 when they were re-released.

I'm just happy I'm one of those people can choose between 2D and 3D.
 
3D as it stands is bloody awful (I wasn't impressed with it with Avatar at all), but one would have thought if there was one brand that would suit it, it'd be Superman. I'll still be diappointed if the film's in 3D though, and will see it in 2D unless the 3D format gets raves.
 
Aswell wouldn't making it 3D increase the budget, I'd rather it was spent on something else personally.
 
man....you anti-3D guys have no VISION...








...get it?? VISION??? :hehe:
 
that's understandable. most 3D glasses aren't glasses friendly. luckily for me, i started wearing contacts a year before 3D started becoming popular.
 
that's understandable. most 3D glasses aren't glasses friendly. luckily for me, i started wearing contacts a year before 3D started becoming popular.

I wish I could, then I'd be all for 3D...I can imagine Superman flying towards the screen, or a blast of heat vision, or even throwing someone towards the screen
 
is there anything preventing you from getting contacts? i lov'em...not only because i can watch 3D movies no problem but i can also use my peripheral vision........to scope out chicks......
 
is there anything preventing you from getting contacts? i lov'em...not only because i can watch 3D movies no problem but i can also use my peripheral vision........to scope out chicks......

I think I can wear them it's just being a broke college kid, when you spend over $500 on books and several $1,000 on tuition...it can be stressful and you have to prioritize
 
ah...another understandable circumstance. g'luck with college!
 
Literally had a dream that they were filming the movie in 2D last night... My gf's right, I am waaay too into this lol
 
I think I can wear them it's just being a broke college kid, when you spend over $500 on books and several $1,000 on tuition...it can be stressful and you have to prioritize

And then they suck you dry with crap courses that have NOTHING to do with your major and you can't for the life of you pass and end up taking over multiple times until... Bah! :cmad:
 
Hopefully they decide against 3D, and even if they did, I would go out of my way to watch it in 2D. The 3D craze is nothing but a gimmick and adds nothing to the movie, except the ticket prices. 3D actually detracts from the movie not only because of the uncomfortable glasses, but because the poorly rendered 3D graphics are ineffective most of the time, causing the viewer to constantly adjust his vision. There's a reason why Nolan decided against it.
 
Actually I kinda am.

My left eye is very bad I can't read with both eyes and 3D makes it very difficult for me to enjoy movies.

I'm sorry to hear that too. Makes feel like a dick for the 3D comment.


But let's be honest here. The 3D technology itself isn't the problem. The problem are the studios:

1) Shoving 3D in theaters without 2D options
2) Post-converting 3D trying to replicate real 3D

If both of these problems can be solved I see the 3D hate going down.
 
Snyder has said that he isn't opposed to 3d but would rather opt to shoot something in 3d then convert it.

And while WB had initially said that they were going to release all their blockbusters in 3d , that doesn't work anymore. Nolan declining to convert Inception , Snyder declining to convert Sucker Punch and them not releasing eathly Hallows in half assed 3d tells me at least that they are starting to realise that if you want to release something in 3d , do it right.
I still don't know what the approach will be with Green Lantern.
Will they go the route of Potter and convert the movie once the movie is done...in which you can pretty much bet you're money that there won't be a 3d movie out in time.
Or are they going the route of Alice in Wonderland which was shot in 2d but because th vast majority of the footage was shot against a green screen , only a small portion of the footafg was converted. The greenscreen stuff was rendered in stereo from the start.


And considering that many directors are opting to shoot with the red one camera ( it's being used for Hobbit , SPider-man 4 ,POTC 4 , Alien prequel) , i wouldn't be surprised if Snyder decided to use that camera as well. WB will demand that Superman be shot and released in 3d. They won't get that chance with Batman but they aren't letting Superman go.
 
And then they suck you dry with crap courses that have NOTHING to do with your major and you can't for the life of you pass and end up taking over multiple times until... Bah! :cmad:

tell me about it
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"