yes, and that's really the main reason why I can't fully embrace or enjoy SR ( as much as I want to ).
For me, it wasn't the so-called lack of action, or lack of a supervillian slugfest, or the "rehash" of the Donner films. It wasn't the suit ( which, aside from the color shades, looked much better on screen ). It wasn't even the basic premise of the movie ( Superman being absent and then coming back to a society that has moved on ).
Quite frankly, those didn't really bother me....Heck, they could have done a remake of the first Superman movie with updated technology and special effects ( like King Kong ) and I would have been a happy camper.
No, what dampened my enjoyment of the film was that it really missed the mark on Superman's CHARACTER.
For me, personally, Superman is not only appealing because of his powers but also because of his morals, his values, his character. he's the BIG BLUE BOYSCOUT......a STRONG MORAL CHARACTER.....he's this last bastion of old-fashioned decency, virtue, and integrity.....he represents the ideals we, as humans, should all strive to attain. IOW, he should be the ULTIMATE ROLE MODEL.
For me, that's what makes him Super, and it is what sets him apart from all the other comic book heroes. While some may think those characteristics make Superman square and boring, I think that's what makes Superman unique amongst heroes......
And, that's where SR failed to deliver. In an attempt to make Superman more "human and relatable," Singer put Superman in situations and a context that seemed to focus on just one aspect of his character ( his isolation and loneliness as an alien). However, imo, it also undercut the other aspects that I discussed above.
IOW, SR's Superman seemed to lack the moral strength and values which I would normally attribute to Superman. Otherwise, he wouldn't have gotten into those situations in the first place.....