it was explained.And the first Austin Powers (technically VHS but those sales are what prompted the sequels...)
it was explained.
this is not the first terminator movie. there was a movie in 2003 and it didnt brake all records. so they tryed again and it still didnt do enough.
its not like this is the first time this happened. some are talking about a second chance. TS was the second chance.
I'm sure people here thought TS would.
Not really. Most were optimistic but also had pretty realistic expectations. If anyone expected a movie on par with Cameron's films, they were setting themselves up for disappointment.
I said the very same thing last year:
^Have there been any reports on the international BO yet?
I'm curious as to how this is doing over seas as well
Sorry but I think people were foolissh if they expecting T1 and T2 quality, no matter how much McG does, he is not James Cameron or even close, and never will be.
It's definitely gonna be the biggest Terminator film and hopefully one of the best films of the summer, it's just the matter of how much the stupid films opening against it will take away from it.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Good call. Someone get some lottery numbers from this guy...
It did well in its first week, and is doing well here in the UK, it just depends on how bit its drop-off was this week.
Don't forget inflation! Those numbers for T3 are slightly bigger now, I'd imagine.
I didn't know anything about McG nor did I even care. I just knew he had a bad rep and he made it sound like he wanted to redeem himself. All the elements seem to be there for a good film. McG himself kept talking about how he wanted to focus on structure and plot. Thats what made T1 and T2 good (as well as the action, which was definitely present in TS), so why should this one be any different? At least that was my thinking at the time.
Plus, everything we saw and heard about the movie before it came out - trailers, interviews, set reports, stills, you name it - made TS look awesome. This one hurt.![]()
It's numbers here and there still haven't touched even T3.
T3
Domestic: $150,371,112 34.7%
+ Foreign: $283,000,000 65.3%
= Worldwide: $433,371,112
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=terminator3.htm
Terminator:Salvation
Domestic: $110,521,000 52.7%
+ Foreign: $99,105,311 47.3%
= Worldwide: $209,626,311
http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=terminatorsalvation.htm
And to be honest I don't know if this makes me happy or sad. The good news is they won't get the chance to ruin the Terminator franchise even more. The bad news is they can't redeem themselves.
Staying power proved important at the foreign box office as well, where "Terminator Salvation" was No. 1 for the second weekend in a row. The Halcyon Co.'s fourth entry in the science-fiction series, which is being distributed internationally by Sony, grossed $46.1 million. That includes very impressive launches in Japan and China, where it grossed $10.7 million and $9 million, respectively.
The $200-million movie is making up for a soft performance in the U.S. and Canada, where it has earned $113.8 million, with foreign grosses that already total $165.5 million.
http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/enterta ... again.html
domestic: $113.8 million
foreign: $165.5 million
worldwide total: $279.3 million
But from the start, no matter what McG said, he ISNT James Cameron and doesnt have half the talent, just because something looks good in trailers doesnt mean it will be. How many bad movies have looked awesome from their trailers in the past? T1 and T2 are two of the best action/sci-fi movies ever, TS was never going to be anywere near as good.