amazingly atiba
Lets go catch a spider
- Joined
- Jun 18, 2013
- Messages
- 2,142
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
^ ultimate hero youre just not getting it even tho we keep constantly explaining it
No character has the purpose of just walking by and saying hello. There had to be some reason her character was there. Unless you guys think MJ was relegated to being as small a role as Jenny in MOS? Which I just can't see happening.
No character has the purpose of just walking by and saying hello. There had to be some reason her character was there. Unless you guys think MJ was relegated to being as small a role as Jenny in MOS? Which I just can't see happening.
Let's stop trying to convince him otherwise.It was an introduction, it wasn't going to be a love triangle, so there wasn't alot for her, she probably appeared in some scenes to set her up, nothing that will effect the plot
It's one of them things where people think if a character in the comics appears on screen it will be a big part of the story, not always, infact it might be similar with Norman's screen time for all we know
It could easy be a set up for something bigger later on
As far as I can tell, the only truly significant things that were excised from TASM were Ratha's death and the hints that what happened to Peter might not've been as accidental as it seemed and might've been tied in to his parents' disappearance, and Webb still has time to address at least the parts of the story pertaining to his parents and the spider-bite that gave him his powers, so I really don't see why the cuts made to TASM are so devastating.
The purpose of Shailene's scenes was to have been to introduce MJ to Peter and set up their friendship, which was to have been greatly expanded on in the future. It's really no different than a television series introducing a background character who later goes on to become a major recurring character and still later a series regular. The thing that has changed is that Webb no longer has to take that approach.
The whole entire scene with Connors' in his kitchen was re-written. Originally he told Peter a lot more about his father and you actually see them bonding in that scene. In addition to those. The film set it up as a story about a boy discovering where he came from then half-way through deleted all of that to focus on the love story aspect. There was also a lot greater focus on Captain George Stacy, particularly at the dinner scene, which made his death all the more poignant.
It should be pretty obvious that Webb was taking a 'TV guest star' approach to introducing MJ, likely because he was trying to 'hedge his bets' in case TASM3 was to be the end of the story. Now that TASM3 and 4 are locked-in, he's got the chance to actually introduce MJ without having to go the Tv guest star route.
Anyone else getting the feeling that we might get another stupid last minute editing?
Oh Dear God, PLEASE don't let this theory be true.
they knew they were getting tasm 3 but not tasm 4 thats what all of this revloves around! if it was just tasm 3 which its not then mj would have stayed gwen would have died and mj would have larger role in tasm 3 but thats not the case anymore
they knew they were getting tasm 3 but not tasm 4 thats what all of this revloves around! if it was just tasm 3 which its not then mj would have stayed gwen would have died and mj would have larger role in tasm 3 but thats not the case anymore
And how do you know of this?
The film series is still about a boy discovering where he came from.
And this is a serialized film series.^ Serialized television series do it all the time.
But how do you know that Peter and Curt were going to bond in that scene, and that he would tell him more about his parents?They showed in the book and there was a snapshot of that exact scene in the film. That was re-shot for whatever reason.
From where are you getting this?The whole entire scene with Connors' in his kitchen was re-written. Originally he told Peter a lot more about his father and you actually see them bonding in that scene. In addition to those. The film set it up as a story about a boy discovering where he came from then half-way through deleted all of that to focus on the love story aspect. There was also a lot greater focus on Captain George Stacy, particularly at the dinner scene, which made his death all the more poignant.
They always knew they were going to have ASM 3. So, if that was the case, how exactly is doing that robbing them from giving MJ more focus in ASM3 if she was that background of a character? They always knew they were going to do more.
But how do you know that Peter and Curt were going to bond in that scene, and that he would tell him more about his parents?