Vid Electricz
Sidekick
- Joined
- Nov 19, 2010
- Messages
- 2,845
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 31
Sorry again RBW
No. Some opinions are informed and some are uninformed. Just because you hate Twilight (everyone hates Twilight. We get it) and love TASM doesn't mean that there are no similarities between the two, particularly, the decidedly different approach to the character and romance.
Now I'm not saying that TASM "ripped off" Twlight or anything so simplistic or juvenile. I am saying that studios follow and in fact, bank heavily on trends. Remember after the success of the first few Harry Potter movies how there were suddenly a million adaptations of young adult fantasy novels(Lemony Snickett, the Spiderwick Chronicles, Golden Compass, etc...)- which weren't necessarily Harry Potter "rip offs", but the decision for the studio to greenlight them was heavily, heavily influenced by the success of the Harry Potter franchise.
For those of us that notice and pay attention to such things, the fact that they decided to reboot, putting Parker back in high school (which made logistical sense from a storytelling standpoint sure- but would also appeal to a greater extent to pre-teens and teenagers), They decided to make the character a more brooding, angsty "outsider" (which IS a trend now-whether you believe the character has always been this way or not), Hire a director known for his hit romantic film to develop a romance that the female demographic could more easily identify with, etc... And this is putting aside the superficial aesthetics like trendy music and clothing, etc...
It's not a conspiracy and it's not a rip off, but studios don't make choices like this apropo of nothing...
Peter Parker who has been drawn any number of ways over the years. From "dumpy" and "nerdy", to average everyman to supermodel gorgeous. Right.
Quips? I must have missed the part where Garfield received a scriptwriting credit!
There was never really a high school love story from the comics though. Sure Peter dated Betty Brant for a while, but she didn't attend high school. Anyway, that's not the point. The point is that out of all of the choices they could have made with where to re-start the character (they could have done a soft re-boot as Marvel did with Hulk or WB is doing with Batman), but they chose to focus on the teenage love story. Which is totally fine as far as I'm concerned- I just understand their reasons for doing it (attracting a certain demographic).
But which comics? Spider-Man has been around for 50+ years and the character was in high school for 3 or them.
Studios are lazy. Remember when they hired Tim Story to direct the Fantastic Four because his surprise hit "Barber Shop" showed his talent at directing a "squabbling family"?
It was. Peter looked like he stepped out of an Urban Outfitters catalogue. Like I said, not that it's a problem, but it's just understanding and realizing that things like this are very plainly meant to appeal to certain demographics.
Like I said, I'm in no way comparing the two films, just noting that movies get made in certain ways for certain reasons in Hollywood- and in this case, the trend is pretty visible.
![]()
How man times can a guy post this geez

That's a drawing?![]()
Neither was Tobey MaguiresBut his eyes aren't green, so that picture is invalid.![]()
Just when I thought that we were actually doing better than the Ben Affleck IS Batman thread, I arrive to this nonsense.
Just when I thought that we were actually doing better than the Ben Affleck IS Batman thread, I arrive to this nonsense.
Now this thread is headache inducing.Just when I thought that we were actually doing better than the Ben Affleck IS Batman thread, I arrive to this nonsense.
...What else could it be?