The Amazing Spider-Man 2 The Amazing Spider-Man 2 General Discussion - Part 5

Status
Not open for further replies.
but you have to admit it looks legit

the_amazing_spider_man_2_banner_no_oficial_cine_1_by_jphomeentertainment-d5wa35i.jpg

In an official banner there wouldn't be two suns rising in the background :)

:funny:

Didn't even notice the two suns at all until you said something, lol.
 
man, that scenes going to be incredible hopefully.
 
um...then whats the black thing over her eyes? cmon man. lol

i have a poster on my wall that can say the opposite

batman-the-dark-knight-rises-catwoman.jpg


No light from the goggles is showing up on that one poster, so if anything, it's darkly lit to where her eyes aren't even showing.

It's nothing new...why can't we see Batman's eyes?

167_large--batman-the-dark-knight-rises-poster-bane-batman-catwoman.jpg
 
batman-the-dark-knight-rises-catwoman.jpg


No light from the goggles is showing up on that one poster, so if anything, it's darkly lit to where her eyes aren't even showing.

It's nothing new...why can't we see Batman's eyes?

167_large--batman-the-dark-knight-rises-poster-bane-batman-catwoman.jpg

but in the bat-pot shot has no ears, let me find the exact same poster i have on my wall

batman-el-caballero-de-la-noche-asciende-cine-premiere_MLM-F-3360466472_112012.jpg

see , no eyes and Cat ears
 
Last edited:
but in the bat-pot shot has no ears, let me find the exact same poster i have on my wall

low ress :
batman-el-caballero-de-la-noche-asciende-cine-premiere_MLM-F-3360466472_112012.jpg

Because on the Bat-pod, her ears are down(since her "ears" are her goggles).

Weird poster, but it still just looks like her "ears"/goggles are up and her mask is just darkly lit. She doesn't have two sets of goggles.
 
Because on the Bat-pod, her ears are down(since her "ears" are her goggles).

Weird poster, but it still just looks like her "ears"/goggles are up and her mask is just darkly lit. She doesn't have two sets of goggles.

but still i im holding the magazine where the poster came in right now and there is no sign of eyes and you can see the shape of the googles
 
Last edited:
What blue light?

edited it , but i swear there is not sign of eyes even in the photo

forget it, you are right , end of discussion , when are we going to see Spidey in action? hope they didn´t go full CGI on spidey action
 
Weird. I just know there were many posters of where Batman and Catwoman's eyes are just darkly lit where you can't even see them and you see Selina's ears/goggles on the top of her head. Maybe they just messed up and gave her an outline of the goggles. That's the only thing I can think of I guess.
 
Weird. I just know there were many posters of where Batman and Catwoman's eyes are just darkly lit where you can't even see them and you see Selina's ears/goggles on the top of her head. Maybe they just messed up and gave her an outline of the goggles. That's the only thing I can think of I guess.

maybe , anyway seeing that magazine made me remember that Zsasz was in BB maybe the Ravencroft institute makes similar cameos
 
google is a whole web search though, not a source to find official anything. that's why it's full of fan made stuff too

True, but when you're searching a movie on google, the top link, is a short showcase of the movie taken from wikipedia it looks like? And it has the photo next to it.
If it were my movie, I wouldn't want millions of people searching the title on google, and the first thing they see is a misrepresentation of the real thing.
 
Spider-Man was mostly CG in the first film during action scenes.

but the swinging under the bridge and the parkour part of the scene looking for the killer,and the web scene from the sewer(when he is setting it up), but no outdoors action with practical effects this time :(
 
does anyone else reckon that there will be less set photos of spidey this time round because they will do less practical stunt work?

reason i say that is because the practical stuff in tasm1 was predominantly for when peter was still a bit of a noob at swinging. this time around he's meant to be a pro, which will likely require cgi first and foremost.

kind of like how how the 3rd act of tasm1 had spider-man as cgi most of the time when he was relatively skilled compared to earlier on when he ran from the cops.
 
but the swinging under the bridge and the parkour part of the scene looking for the killer,and the web scene from the sewer(when he is setting it up), but no outdoors action with practical effects this time :(
Repulsor explained it pretty well. Also, we have that one outdoors scene they shot the first day of filming where Spidey caught the impostor.

does anyone else reckon that there will be less set photos of spidey this time round because they will do less practical stunt work?

reason i say that is because the practical stuff in tasm1 was predominantly for when peter was still a bit of a noob at swinging. this time around he's meant to be a pro, which will likely require cgi first and foremost.

kind of like how how the 3rd act of tasm1 had spider-man as cgi most of the time when he was relatively skilled compared to earlier on when he ran from the cops.
Yeah this makes sense.
 
Repulsor explained it pretty well. Also, we have that one outdoors scene they shot the first day of filming where Spidey caught the impostor.


Yeah this makes sense.


hopefully spidey will appear during the chase sequence filming in rochester. also, i hope webb tweets pics of the suit at some point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,306
Messages
22,082,786
Members
45,883
Latest member
Gbiopobing
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"