The Amazing Spider-Man The Amazing Spider-Man General Discussion & Speculation Thread - - - - Part

Status
Not open for further replies.
No, "Spanky" still doesn't get it.

It just sounds like clueless defending and it makes no sense the way you're explaining it. But Raimi is still faithful and you pretty much say the same thing. I'm only asking how TAS-M is MORE faithful.

I know you guys were having the discussion and I know it's subjective but if I can just chime in a little bit of my opinion?

Why I think ASM will be more faithful is purely based on the vibe I'm getting from the characterizations. I can't truly say until the film comes out, but that's what I'm feeling. On the other hand, the origin, among other aspects such as the costume and story are either altered or being more fully explored. But in the end, it doesn't seem like those changes will end up changing the characters' personalities and how they embody the character. Peter will still be an awkward, shy, loner/nerd (whose intellect will be emphasized). Spider-man will also be a jokester, we can also already tell that his movements will be much more fluid and kinetic (spider-like). Compare this to a faithfully done origin, but with characters who were more or less just faithful in name and lacked the personalities that I at least knew from the cartoons and comics. The character still embodied the essence of Spider-man, but I personally couldn't believe that the character I was seeing was really Peter Parker or Spider-man but instead was overly shy, always lacking confidence, continually pining over a girl, lacking a sense of humor and just how little development the character actually went through. So yeah, I'd say both about even in terms of faithfulness both are lack in some areas, but in the end, I'd argue that how true and well ASM portray these characters will ultimately be a deciding factor for me. If I can physically and aesthetically recognize him as Spider-man and Peter Parker, but also emotionally recognize and connect with him as Spider-man/Peer instead of getting annoyed and wishing bad things on him, then that's great.
 
No, "Spanky" still doesn't get it.

It just sounds like clueless defending and it makes no sense the way you're explaining it. But Raimi is still faithful and you pretty much say the same thing. I'm only asking how TAS-M is MORE faithful.

It's not clueless and it can't be explained much simpler.

ASM

canon already seen in movies = reworked

canon not seen yet = introduced

Raimi's Trilogy

Raimi doesn't like it = canon reworked

Raimi likes it = canon introduced

-----------------------------------------------------------

ASM has to change canon to keep things fresh.

Raimi changed canon based on personal whims.

Which is more justified and necessary?
 
Revamping things does NOT mean it's more faithful.
ASM is as faithful as possible where as the Raimi movies were faithful only when he felt like it..

In other words ASM revamped out of necessity, Raimi revamped based on personal disregard for canon.
 
Last edited:
THE GODDAM LEAKED FOOTAGE

Did you just post the leaked footage...on a message board...?

disappointed.gif


You have a lot to learn...

Delete it.
 
Thank you guys though. Very boss.
 
Last edited:
EDIT: nevermind
I didn't see your post before you edited it, but I am guessing you were going to tell me that I really shouldn't have the link in my post right? I was like oh god, now I just look stupid while I was editing lol.
 
From that footage....MARC WEBB HAS OWN RAIMI SPIDERMAN.

Let's not get ahead of ourselves.

If he did ANYTHING better, so far, it's definitely the chemistry between the lead and the love interest. Andrew and Emma are really fun to watch. Like I actually really enjoyed the scene in the hallway. Can't say that about ANY of the scenes between Tobey and Kristen.
 
Let's not get ahead of ourselves.

If he did ANYTHING better, so far, it's definitely the chemistry between the lead and the love interest. Andrew and Emma are really fun to watch. Like I actually really enjoyed the scene in the hallway. Can't say that about ANY of the scenes between Tobey and Kristen.

I really like that scene as well. The editing felt a bit choppy and the pacing felt a bit off compared to what I remembered, but I'm sure that was edited down. I think a lot of the little gestures Andrew does, ie. the way he puts his hands together and the way he turns around and starts skipping really sell the fact that he's supposed to be this awkward teenager. Oh also, I liked how they kind of agreed on doing nothing, just "doing something, or something else". And when Emma's response was "yeah, either one", Andrew's reaction was "really? yes!". Thought that was funny.
 
Last edited:
Please calm yourself SpiderMarvelite, we must wait before final judgement.
 
I don't mind premature celebration.

I constantly see haters who prematurely bash this movie.

It's refreshing to see the opposite.
 
Why dont you forum kids ever like saying "HECK YEAH IT WILL" or something instead of going after those Raimi films...nvm.

I dont care, im hyped to the moon.
 
I don't mind premature celebration.

I constantly see haters who prematurely bash this movie.

It's refreshing to see the opposite.

We still don't know if it will be a good movie though. But, I just wouldn't want to imitate the haters in the opposite fashion. Also, didn't someone post earlier a description where Peter throws Gwen out the window and then catches her with his web? That wasn't in the footage was it?
 
Last edited:
Whats wrong with it, arent you a reboot lover?

Are people here against premature celebration?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"