The Amazing Spider-Man: The Game

Status
Not open for further replies.
Now I'm not sure if it's my sleepiness talking, but what the hell? SM3 is miles better than BAA?


Its not, but he doesn't know the difference between his like of something and the quality of said item. He think because he likes SM3 so much that it HAS to be good, which is a gigantic inaccuracy. I mean there is nothing wrong with saying SM3 is ur fav game or what not, but you HAVE to be able to see the enormous flaws it has. I used it in my last post, i LOVE Tenchu Z, one of my favorite ninja games, but that game is still s**t. Poor controls and horrible visuals but i still find some enjoyment out of it. Aziz can't separate the two.
 
OMG! What the hell is this SM3 trolling?
No trolling, it's the game I see people demanding, but they b****** about when they received it and tossed it over their shoulders

I loved SM2. I played through story-mode multiple times and spent countless hours swinging around NYC. I was very excited when it came to SM3 hoping for a next generation console upgrade to that experience. Instead I got a tortorous and non-memorable story that I had to force myself to play through.
Not a horrid thing, it has fluid story telling with considerable flaws, but not the crap it's made to be
Anyone who thinks SM3 is a good game has zero gaming perspective and taste.
No, actually looking at the game for what it is instead of acting like a drama queen about it
SM3 took the franchise in the wrong direction. The most positive thing I have to say about it is it did look better and the addition of the rest of the NYC bridges was a nice touch, but even then the city bored me for some reason.
That sucks, and reminds me of people complaining about it being another SM2 with a different coat of paintintg that why it's dull, but they demand another SM2. Make up your minds
It doesn't help their idea of random crimes was those bullsh** gang factions attacking people. WTF??? I'd sooner have balloon baby back.
More bleh complaints, that game had little constructive criticism, then plenty of way over the top b*******

WoS I enjoyed with some decent and more memorable story moments, but alot of fluff. The controls were pretty good though and I thought it was on par with Hulk: UD in that vein... but it never filled that void left since SM2 either. Still waiting.
That is one of the worst games, it did nothing good

You can absolutely enjoy SM3, i mean hell iv got some stinkers that i still play every now and then
SM3 is better than a stinker, better than mediocre, better than sub-par
but yea to say the game is innovative just shows a pure lack of knowledge on the subject.
Free flow combat you guys demand, it's there
I haven't played inFAMOUS yet, but from what I understood about that fight in Central Park you guys kinda wanted something in the vein of Harry's fight?
One of the most interactive boss combat systems
Batman's detective mode (which is still not as heavily needed)
Poleswing attack
That pseudo-Spidey you can toss anywhere you like after saving
Map layers, and 3D map
Swimming
Web slingshot from the Bugle

A lot of things weren't there in any previous game or otherwise, good stuff, of course the game is innovative, I didn't miss my mark here
A lot of good stuff done here But honestly, i think aziz is just full of s**t.
I'm far from that, since you realize there are lots of good stuff how about stating what is actually improvement over previous stuff?
He's just trying to get a rise by making these ludicrous claims on the quality(well lack thereof) of SM3.
It's one of the most fun games period, it has a lot of things people are now demanding in SM games, take it from the guy who finished it effing 32 times, read and watched every review of it, played many many more games with the same issues here but never addressed in those games, etc... I don't speak out of thin air, I speak out of "You guys don't make as much sense as you think you sound", and stating things like Catwoman is more agile than SM in any game is just more of that BS lots of people spew

If you want a good game, quit b*******, I realize plenty of the flaws in SM3, never denied them, I want them polished to, but never EVER went over the top about them as people did, and I don't compliment something over more than it deserves, that's just over enthusiasm
Free fall in SD and EoT was started here as a side quest, and it was fun, nothing was upgraded, but they turned them to a chore in SD

Glitches: There are plenty, but the funny ones are more than the annoying ones, and they don't happen all that often
Voice acting issues: There are between the Chinese, are there any more? Yes, not as much as people complained about, they even did to some degree wwhat Beenox did with taking cartoon VA's. There are bleh moments of voice performance, but it's not a bad voice performance, not as bad as you made it to be anyway Pat
All those QTE's: They annoyed me at first, but after playing them so often I thought they were actually nicely thought
Symbiote is just another suit: Rage mode, annihilator, powerful attacks, and that feature was used in SD
Camera: Yes, it's there, it's effing there, but I faced it just as much in almost every other game, even RE4 (PC port only, never happened on the PS2, not with Capcom games in general), it happens in every game the camera follows the character in 3rd person, it's notably more annoying here (to some degree SM2 was clean from this issue). Why is it mentioned so roughly here but not in other games?
Story isn't plugged right: No, there are plenty of notable faults, but one of the complaints I heard is "Story doesn't connect", look at the back of the box, I thought it wouldn't connect and it would be more :dry: than it is, story connects better than I expected, on the map (innovative feature how used here) you notice the "Next mission" button

I share those complaints to some degree, only I DO-NOT-EXAGGERATE
 
You can absolutely enjoy SM3, i mean hell iv got some stinkers that i still play every now and then

So do I.. usually because it happens to hit the nail I'm looking for where it may fail in every other respect (True Crime: NYC is a perfect example.)

SM3 was a downgrade in so many ways where it should have taken everything in SM2 to the next level and improved upon. None of that happened. When someone says they enjoyed it I think they either have little gaming experience or are completely irrational.

If you replace SM3 with WoS in those posts, it makes more sense then. That was a game with alot of promise, but too many rough edges. They obviously didn't get to complete it the way they'd have liked.
 
Spider-Aziz, you're a troll. I hate people like you.
I'm not, I'm tired of people going overboard about stuff, I want this undesirable trait people have to loosen up, and I do it by giving what doesn't plug right from people's saying

Now I'm not sure if it's my sleepiness talking, but what the hell? SM3 is miles better than BAA?
It is, BAA is fun and all, but it has a high degree of praising more than it actually deserves, considering it more than what it gives, and complaining about the other thing more than it's worth.

I'm bored, I'm bothered, and I hate every time people mention these two whether in context or out of context, they are just compared together like two poles of a magnet, and none of them is given justice, one is over praised, the other has too much complaining about it more than it's worth

Trolling happens everywhere, I'm in a thread to say what I say

Its not, but he doesn't know the difference between his like of something and the quality of said item. He think because he likes SM3 so much that it HAS to be good, which is a gigantic inaccuracy.
Will people quit misreading, I went straight forward with things

EDIT: Explaining that BS again
BAA was praised for being innovative/improving some stuff/etc, it did NOT do any of that, not with the combat system or anything, and it's an over glorified button masher (It's not a button masher bs is what I receive)
SM3 is accused of being a simple downgrade, look at all the things it inserted that weren't there before, and the more stylistic and FREE FLOW that is NOT a button masher, but what Nathan wants and you guys (Starting with you Pat) agree with ()SM3 is a button masher combat system, dodging here is nothing strategic like in BAA, combat is nothing strategic at all, it's a button masher to have all those fun combinations you can master easily and do stylistically with different sequences going upwards, staying grounded, doing specials, etc, it has nothing to satisfy all tastes, only things to whine about)

you do know what innovative means right? and what comes with it right?
You read what I said, right?
wildly unpopular games.... are NEVER considered innovative. popular and innovative sorta go hand in hand... thing's arnt innovative just because you like them and think so...
Just because they are hated doesn't make them out of being innovative
 
Last edited:
SM3 was a downgrade in so many ways where it should have taken everything in SM2 to the next level and improved upon. None of that happened.
It downgraded some stuff in free roam; stree missions variety, wall bounce, chopper swinging, two types of swinging, visiting other islands, it did not downgrade anything more, and upgraded plenty
When someone says they enjoyed it I think they either have little gaming experience or are completely irrational.
No, I'm more rational than I'm thought to be, and I have plenty of gaming experience, and this is officially underrated

If you replace SM3 with WoS in those posts, it makes more sense then
Cause:
The finger puppet in everyones hand
The cheap jump
The terrible characterization of BC & BW
No variety
Symbiote written completely wrong
Bland stuff all over the place and extreme repetition
Cheap arse boring soundtracks

Those are all far more fun than:
hanging on a guy flying back and flying
placing a guy you just saved on a boat
all the neat web attacks
all the massive hand to hand
decent uses of great comic panels (Dewolf, go to Digger's arc from JMS & JRjr)
fun H2H where you can switch foes (free flow, no?)
reflexes and fun dodging and counter system for blue indicator attacks
Harry's fight vs Vulture fight.....
Exciting mood fitting music
Things I wanted in a Spidey game for more years than I remember
Things people wanted in Spidey games and are fun

Yeah, sure, WoS is far better than SM3, makes lots of sense. Even the short version of saying the title of that 2k8 game is horrendously bad, read it with a loud voice and tell me if no one laughs or say "Don't misbehave"
 
Spider-Aziz ... you don't question your stance at all on the fact... 99% of people seem to disagree with you? yup... totally an innovative game...:whatever: #bestgameeverrrrrrrrrr

you can like a game all you want. but don't call it things it's not.
 
So apparently now it's innovative to make a shallow attempt to repeat a game that you already made about 3 years prior?
 
Spideyboy_1111 said:
Spider-Aziz ... you don't question your stance at all on the fact... 99% of people seem to disagree with you? yup... totally an innovative game...#bestgameeverrrrrrrrrr

He is the 1% :P
 
Spider-Aziz ... you don't question your stance at all on the fact... 99% of people seem to disagree with you? yup...
You shouldn't talk, not who think the slowpoke from the first movie game is good
totally an innovative game...
It took plenty of chances, did lots and lots of new additions, that bad? No, they did it better than it's considered to be.
#bestgameeverrrrrrrrrr
Either you see why I'm angry and how more right I am than you think, or you shut up. First movie game SUCKS, that is a mediocre game, not this amazing game released in 2007, SM3 on the Wii is mediocre, story is better a bit, gameplay is bleh

you can like a game all you want. but don't call it things it's not.
I didn't call it what it's not, you and others did. You saw beyond the evil "EW" vision of yours? It is exactly what I said it is. I'm fair with criticism, it deserves some criticisms, I hand it to it, but I never go overboard like 99% of the people did

It's not only innovative and creative, what did it get in complaints? "Unispired boss fight"? "Thugs with long bars and a few special moves"? No, Hell not anything in that vein

Awful this game is no where in anywhere it isn't, mediocre it's not, first movie game is in no way better, SD is in no way better, what you think of it is NOT RIGHT.

Innovative it is, best boss fights it has, lots of fun, doing far greater justice than BEENOX did so far, and it's a great game with less flaws than people make it to be. Don't bother me any more about it

So apparently now it's innovative to make a shallow attempt to repeat a game that you already made about 3 years prior?
I brought up one of the millions of $#%^ contradicted complaints it received. I never felt it that way, never, not at all


Spider-Sense: Copied to Arkham Asylum as Detective Mode, but that was ignored. NOT IMPROVED. Not there, not in SD nor in EoT
3D map with multi-layers: This is the earliest game I see like that, it's the only game I see like that
Boss fight going anywhere: If this happened in inFAMOUS, remember Harry's fight
Interacting with bosses in a manner using the environment: It's the first I remember to do it and give a good handle on it after GoW (ok, not SO innovative)
Free flow combat: It was done here, and this was released before the first Assassin's Creed was released on PC
Different moves and symbiote powers: It was never done before
Placing people you save anywhere you desire: That's new, that's fun
Fighting a boss in the subway: It's awesome to take Harry and let a train hit him
Kraven taken to more potential as a game boss: never done before
Stealth indicator is a new feature
Dodging and acrobatic fun Spidey like counterattacks: NEVER DONE BEFORE THIS ONE
Grabbing Lizard's tail and tossing him: It's awesome and new

Even with the bland move sets of Venom in that game, it's the first to allow you to toss the boss around, and throw him on what damages him, I can web hammer Venom and toss him on the steel bars making that noise hurting him

If all that and plenty more is nothing innovative at all, then you should rot with your opinion, enjoy terrible games when it comes to Spider-Man, fine, just don't say I don't know what I'm talking about after showing you how so much of what you overrule is THEEEEEERE, you suck if you do that, and I don't want your opinion about Spider-Man games anymore, keep them to yourself
 
Last edited:
For ****'s sake is Aziz ONCE AGAIN over arguing about "how great and underrated" SM3 is?
 
The Arkham games are for fact of much better quality than any Spider-Man game so far.

BTW guys, I must ask, is there a way to block users in here? I mean, so that you don't have to read stupid posters' stupid posts?
 
The Arkham games are for fact of much better quality than any Spider-Man game so far.

BTW guys, I must ask, is there a way to block users in here? I mean, so that you don't have to read stupid posters' stupid posts?

Yes. There's a "Block users" list that can be accessed from the User Control Panel.
 
The Arkham games are for fact of much better quality than any Spider-Man game so far.

BTW guys, I must ask, is there a way to block users in here? I mean, so that you don't have to read stupid posters' stupid posts?

Yea dude, its just called, scroll over their post.
 
If all that and plenty more is nothing innovative at all, then you should rot with your opinion, enjoy terrible games when it comes to Spider-Man, fine, just don't say I don't know what I'm talking about after showing you how so much of what you overrule is THEEEEEERE, you suck if you do that, and I don't want your opinion about Spider-Man games anymore, keep them to yourself


But everything you point out is wrong. I mean its as though you are trying to argue that the sky is in fact purple, not blue. I mean its clear its blue. Same thing is happening here. SM3 isn't a good game bud, no matter how bad you want it to be.
 
And the gliding fight has something from FFVIII, but things aren't used so much

For ****'s sake is Aziz ONCE AGAIN over arguing about "how great and underrated" SM3 is?
Of course, I will keep going cause SM3 is the most underrated game, and it's great

The Arkham games are for fact of much better quality than any Spider-Man game so far.
Graphics and story maybe, not much else

BTW guys, I must ask, is there a way to block users in here? I mean, so that you don't have to read stupid posters' stupid posts?
First; nothing here is stupid, second; not only is SM3 much better than BAA, it's more influential and underrated, victim of stupid stupid opinions

But everything you point out is wrong.
On the contrary, only wrong I said is one thing in pinning BAA down too harshly early on. And people still (you included) are demanding another SM3 the game
I mean its as though you are trying to argue that the sky is in fact purple, not blue. I mean its clear its blue.
No, don't turn me away by bleh comparisons like that
Same thing is happening here. SM3 isn't a good game bud, no matter how bad you want it to be.
Of course it is good, it's great, criminally underrated, I didn't want to get it cause initially I was repulsed by it, but I did get it, not only is it one of the more innovative games of this gen of consoles, but it is one of the more influential ones, whether you admit it or not, I said nothing short of the truth.

If a game gets 4-5 decent criticizing points and hundreds of BS complaints like SM3 did, then guys like you say a game more influenced by this than you wish to believe is far far superior and it upgraded nothing, I will stand for the underrated one

If I wanted to stand for a favorite game I might stand on side of things like Ultimate Spider-Man which is a really really good game, but it isn't so terribly underrated. SM3 is too underrated cause it is, I didn't want this game to be good, it is good, if something I wanted to avoid turns to be the best thing I played in a long time I wouldn't skip defending it, especially if the same things complained about here are available in the likes of BAA, Assassin's Creed (some of my favorites tbh) or others, you don't complain about them being there in one game and ignore them being more in the game you highly praise as so many people do.
 
Last edited:
Aaah. It feels like walking out in the woods, feeling the fresh air and calming silence.
 
First; nothing here is stupid, second; not only is SM3 much better than BAA, it's more influential and underrated, victim of stupid stupid opinions

Oh i beg to differ. Theres some stupid here alright, i mean look what you are writing man. This is why i have to assume you are just trolling. You can't possibly be that dumb.

On the contrary, only wrong I said is one thing in pinning BAA down too harshly early on. And people still (you included) are demanding another SM3 the game

Wrong. Only you and i mean ONLY you want another SM3. Most of us here are far better judges of quality than you could ever be so we fully realize how bad that game is. You just flat out dont know what you are talking about. Its exhausting dude.
 
:dry::dry::dry::dry::dry:

OK, you deserve more games in the ilk of Shattered Dimensions, flat out repetitive and dull with stupid stories, and characterizations like those in WoS, not to forget the hero needs to be as slow as he is in the first movie game and have a regular thug punching much faster than he does, and combat & swinging mechanics much in the ilk of Spider-Man 2 for PC

That Spider-Man game is perfect for most of you, if you don't like it, don't complain about it and play Spider-Man 2600 instead. Keep your comments away from my favorite superhero game
 
there isnt one spider-man game thats even close to the quality of AA and AC...
Its sad when Catwoman is more agile and fun to play than Spidey...

Spider-Man 3 was nearly unbearable to play...but maybe we should just let Aziz have his opinion so he wont make these gigantic sized posts about whats so "innovative" about it
 
:dry::dry::dry::dry::dry:

OK, you deserve more games in the ilk of Shattered Dimensions, flat out repetitive and dull with stupid stories, and characterizations like those in WoS, not to forget the hero needs to be as slow as he is in the first movie game and have a regular thug punching much faster than he does, and combat & swinging mechanics much in the ilk of Spider-Man 2 for PC

That Spider-Man game is perfect for most of you, if you don't like it, don't complain about it and play Spider-Man 2600 instead. Keep your comments away from my favorite superhero game


All of those games u mentioned suck just as much as Spider-Man 3. I don't want any more of those, but I deff don't want another SM3, ya know, because it's trash and all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Users who are viewing this thread

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
202,287
Messages
22,079,492
Members
45,881
Latest member
semicharmedlife
Back
Top
monitoring_string = "afb8e5d7348ab9e99f73cba908f10802"